The Paradox of Positive Emotions in the LGBTQIA+ Community: Examining Relationships with Alcohol Misuse and Interpersonal Support.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Tristan S Fletcher, Jeffrey J Klibert, Donovan Edward, Brandon J Weiss
{"title":"The Paradox of Positive Emotions in the LGBTQIA+ Community: Examining Relationships with Alcohol Misuse and Interpersonal Support.","authors":"Tristan S Fletcher, Jeffrey J Klibert, Donovan Edward, Brandon J Weiss","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2026.2732188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>LGBTQIA+ community members report greater risks for alcohol misuse problems. In response, researchers are encouraged to identify protective factors in the development of prevention programming. Namely, it is important to deconstruct how LGBTQIA+ individuals use support mechanisms to buffer the effects of risk factors (positive emotions) on alcohol misuse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether social support indices moderated the relationship between positive emotions and alcohol misuse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community sample of 169 LGBTQIA+ individuals completed a series of self-report measures. Participants were administered the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, Modified Differential Emotions Scale, and Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate a positive relationship between positive emotions and alcohol misuse. However, this relationship varied as a function of perceived social support indices (appraisal, belonging, tangible). Specifically, at high levels of social support indices, the relationship between positive emotions and alcohol misuse was non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate social support meets preliminary methodological criteria for a protective factor to alcohol misuse. Moving forward, it is important for research to develop and evaluate social support interventions designed to leverage the psychological benefits of positive emotions in reducing risk to alcohol-related problems within the LGBTQIA+ community.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2026.2732188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: LGBTQIA+ community members report greater risks for alcohol misuse problems. In response, researchers are encouraged to identify protective factors in the development of prevention programming. Namely, it is important to deconstruct how LGBTQIA+ individuals use support mechanisms to buffer the effects of risk factors (positive emotions) on alcohol misuse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether social support indices moderated the relationship between positive emotions and alcohol misuse.

Methods: A community sample of 169 LGBTQIA+ individuals completed a series of self-report measures. Participants were administered the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, Modified Differential Emotions Scale, and Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12.

Results: Findings indicate a positive relationship between positive emotions and alcohol misuse. However, this relationship varied as a function of perceived social support indices (appraisal, belonging, tangible). Specifically, at high levels of social support indices, the relationship between positive emotions and alcohol misuse was non-significant.

Conclusions: These findings indicate social support meets preliminary methodological criteria for a protective factor to alcohol misuse. Moving forward, it is important for research to develop and evaluate social support interventions designed to leverage the psychological benefits of positive emotions in reducing risk to alcohol-related problems within the LGBTQIA+ community.

LGBTQIA+群体中积极情绪的悖论:酒精滥用与人际支持的关系研究
背景:LGBTQIA+社区成员报告酒精滥用问题的风险更高。因此,鼓励研究人员在制订预防方案时查明保护因素。也就是说,解构LGBTQIA+个体如何使用支持机制来缓冲风险因素(积极情绪)对酒精滥用结果的影响是很重要的。本研究的目的是评估社会支持指数是否调节积极情绪与酒精滥用之间的关系。方法:在社区抽取169名LGBTQIA+个体,完成一系列自我报告测量。对被试进行酒精使用障碍识别测试、修正差异情绪量表和人际支持评估表-12。结果:研究结果表明积极情绪与酒精滥用之间存在正相关关系。然而,这种关系随着感知社会支持指数(评价、归属感、有形)的函数而变化。具体而言,在高水平的社会支持指数下,积极情绪与酒精滥用之间的关系不显著。结论:这些发现表明社会支持符合酒精滥用保护因素的初步方法学标准。展望未来,重要的是研究开发和评估旨在利用积极情绪的心理益处来降低LGBTQIA+社区中与酒精相关问题的风险的社会支持干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书