Emphysema treatment gap and gender differences in a lung cancer screening cohort.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1159/res/aepag009
Sara Elatris, Charlotte Besson, Isabelle Pitrou, Benjamin M Smith, Abhinav Sharma, Jean Bourbeau, Robyn Tamblyn, Roland Grad, Andrea Benedetti, Simon Martel, François Maltais, Emily McDonald, Nicole Ezer
{"title":"Emphysema treatment gap and gender differences in a lung cancer screening cohort.","authors":"Sara Elatris, Charlotte Besson, Isabelle Pitrou, Benjamin M Smith, Abhinav Sharma, Jean Bourbeau, Robyn Tamblyn, Roland Grad, Andrea Benedetti, Simon Martel, François Maltais, Emily McDonald, Nicole Ezer","doi":"10.1159/res/aepag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a unique opportunity to improve diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals. Gender differences have been reported in the management of COPD, though inconsistently. We examined the factors associated with pharmacologic treatment of COPD among LCS participants with radiologic visual emphysema and the gender-differences in treatment and symptoms of COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from the Quebec LCS program (smokers or ex-smokers aged 55-74 years with a PLCOm2012 ≥ 2%) between April 2023 and July 2024 A LCS cohort was constituted from LCS participants with any level of visual emphysema on their LDCT scans and defined as having probable COPD. Primary outcome was pharmacological treatment for probable COPD defined as self-reported use of long-acting bronchodilators. Participants were screened for respiratory symptoms with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scales. Probable symptomatic COPD was defined as visual emphysema on LDCT scan with mMRC score ≥ 1 and/or CAT score ≥ 10. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the likelihood of pharmacologic treatment for probable COPD, including gender, sociodemographic variables, radiologic emphysema severity, smoking, and body mass index. Gender-based differences in pharmacotherapy and symptoms were further examined using stratified analyses in males and females.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1026 participants undergoing LCS, 801 (78%) had visual emphysema of any level on LDCT, with 75% (603/801) of these lacking pharmacological treatment for probable COPD. Males were more likely to lack pharmacological treatment compared to females (58% vs. 42%). In multivariable analysis, the factors associated with treatment for probable COPD were female gender (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.24), and moderate-to-severe emphysema (OR 2.36; 95%CI: 1.64-3.41). Among participants screened for respiratory symptoms (397/603), 56% (221/397) were symptomatic (mean CAT=12.6 and mMRC score=0.91). Females (111/174; 64%) reported more symptoms than males (110/223; 49%), particularly for minimal-to-mild emphysema: mean CAT=10.3 and mMRC=0.62 vs. mean CAT=8.2 and mMRC=0.41.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of pharmacological treatment was frequent among LCS participants with symptomatic radiologic emphysema. Lack of treatment was associated with male gender, and a lesser degree of radiologic emphysema. Females reported more symptoms for milder emphysema. Integrating respiratory diagnosis within LCS programs is an important opportunity to leverage the LDCT results and raise clinical suspicion of individuals with COPD. Raising awareness on the gender differences in pharmacological treatments is essential to close the treatment gap in COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/res/aepag009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a unique opportunity to improve diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals. Gender differences have been reported in the management of COPD, though inconsistently. We examined the factors associated with pharmacologic treatment of COPD among LCS participants with radiologic visual emphysema and the gender-differences in treatment and symptoms of COPD.

Methods: Participants were recruited from the Quebec LCS program (smokers or ex-smokers aged 55-74 years with a PLCOm2012 ≥ 2%) between April 2023 and July 2024 A LCS cohort was constituted from LCS participants with any level of visual emphysema on their LDCT scans and defined as having probable COPD. Primary outcome was pharmacological treatment for probable COPD defined as self-reported use of long-acting bronchodilators. Participants were screened for respiratory symptoms with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scales. Probable symptomatic COPD was defined as visual emphysema on LDCT scan with mMRC score ≥ 1 and/or CAT score ≥ 10. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the likelihood of pharmacologic treatment for probable COPD, including gender, sociodemographic variables, radiologic emphysema severity, smoking, and body mass index. Gender-based differences in pharmacotherapy and symptoms were further examined using stratified analyses in males and females.

Results: Among 1026 participants undergoing LCS, 801 (78%) had visual emphysema of any level on LDCT, with 75% (603/801) of these lacking pharmacological treatment for probable COPD. Males were more likely to lack pharmacological treatment compared to females (58% vs. 42%). In multivariable analysis, the factors associated with treatment for probable COPD were female gender (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.24), and moderate-to-severe emphysema (OR 2.36; 95%CI: 1.64-3.41). Among participants screened for respiratory symptoms (397/603), 56% (221/397) were symptomatic (mean CAT=12.6 and mMRC score=0.91). Females (111/174; 64%) reported more symptoms than males (110/223; 49%), particularly for minimal-to-mild emphysema: mean CAT=10.3 and mMRC=0.62 vs. mean CAT=8.2 and mMRC=0.41.

Conclusion: Lack of pharmacological treatment was frequent among LCS participants with symptomatic radiologic emphysema. Lack of treatment was associated with male gender, and a lesser degree of radiologic emphysema. Females reported more symptoms for milder emphysema. Integrating respiratory diagnosis within LCS programs is an important opportunity to leverage the LDCT results and raise clinical suspicion of individuals with COPD. Raising awareness on the gender differences in pharmacological treatments is essential to close the treatment gap in COPD.

肺癌筛查队列中肺气肿治疗差距和性别差异。
低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查(LCS)是提高高风险人群慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断和治疗的独特机会。性别差异在COPD的治疗中也有报道,尽管不一致。我们研究了LCS参与者中伴有放射学视觉肺气肿的COPD药物治疗的相关因素,以及COPD治疗和症状的性别差异。方法:2023年4月至2024年7月从魁北克LCS项目招募参与者(年龄55-74岁,PLCOm2012≥2%的吸烟者或戒烟者)。LCS队列由LDCT扫描显示任何程度的视觉肺气肿的LCS参与者组成,并定义为可能患有COPD。主要终点是自我报告使用长效支气管扩张剂的可能性COPD的药物治疗。使用改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)和COPD评估测试(CAT)量表对参与者进行呼吸道症状筛查。可能的症状性COPD定义为LDCT扫描可见肺气肿,mMRC评分≥1和/或CAT评分≥10。使用Logistic回归来确定与可能的COPD药物治疗可能性相关的因素,包括性别、社会人口统计学变量、放射学肺气肿严重程度、吸烟和体重指数。在男性和女性中使用分层分析进一步检查基于性别的药物治疗和症状差异。结果:在1026名接受LCS的参与者中,801名(78%)在LDCT上有任何程度的视觉肺气肿,其中75%(603/801)缺乏可能的COPD药物治疗。与女性相比,男性更可能缺乏药物治疗(58%对42%)。在多变量分析中,与COPD治疗相关的因素为女性(OR 1.58; 95%CI: 1.11-2.24)和中重度肺气肿(OR 2.36; 95%CI: 1.64-3.41)。在接受呼吸道症状筛查的参与者(397/603)中,56%(221/397)出现症状(平均CAT=12.6, mMRC评分=0.91)。女性(111/174,64%)报告的症状多于男性(110/223,49%),尤其是轻至轻度肺气肿:平均CAT=10.3, mMRC=0.62 vs.平均CAT=8.2, mMRC=0.41。结论:缺乏药物治疗是常见的LCS患者的症状放射性肺气肿。缺乏治疗与男性有关,放射性肺气肿程度较轻。女性报告的轻度肺气肿症状更多。在LCS项目中整合呼吸诊断是一个重要的机会,可以利用LDCT结果并提高对COPD患者的临床怀疑。提高对药物治疗中性别差异的认识对于缩小慢性阻塞性肺病的治疗差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书