Svenja Wöhle, Clea Parcerisas, Susannah Buchan, John Calambokidis, Kathleen M Stafford, Elena Schall
{"title":"Searching for separation between frequency-modulated calls of blue and fin whales.","authors":"Svenja Wöhle, Clea Parcerisas, Susannah Buchan, John Calambokidis, Kathleen M Stafford, Elena Schall","doi":"10.1038/s41598-026-71077-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable differentiation of similar acoustic signals remains a major challenge for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of sympatric marine mammal species. Blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) produce frequency-modulated (FM) downsweeping calls with overlapping frequency ranges and durations, making species attribution difficult. This study combines long-term PAM datasets with animal-borne tag recordings to investigate how these FM calls can be reliably distinguished by species. Tag recordings with confirmed species identity showed substantial overlap in most acoustic features, but the parameter Duration 90% offered partial separation: with most fin whale FM calls < 0.6 s, and blue whale FM calls > 0.7 s. Applied to high-quality calls from moored data with signal-to-noise ratios above 12 dB, this approach may provide a conservative, rule-based means of classification. A more robust approach was achieved by combining deep learning feature extraction with non-linear dimensionality reduction. Integrating confirmed ground-truth tag recordings as a reference space enabled previously unseen FM calls from long-term PAM recordings to be attributed by acoustic similarity to known calls while maintaining an explicit measure of uncertainty by leaving acoustically ambiguous calls unassigned. Together, these approaches provide a practical framework for more reliable call attribution, enhancing long-term PAM-based monitoring of blue and fin whales.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71077-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reliable differentiation of similar acoustic signals remains a major challenge for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of sympatric marine mammal species. Blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) produce frequency-modulated (FM) downsweeping calls with overlapping frequency ranges and durations, making species attribution difficult. This study combines long-term PAM datasets with animal-borne tag recordings to investigate how these FM calls can be reliably distinguished by species. Tag recordings with confirmed species identity showed substantial overlap in most acoustic features, but the parameter Duration 90% offered partial separation: with most fin whale FM calls < 0.6 s, and blue whale FM calls > 0.7 s. Applied to high-quality calls from moored data with signal-to-noise ratios above 12 dB, this approach may provide a conservative, rule-based means of classification. A more robust approach was achieved by combining deep learning feature extraction with non-linear dimensionality reduction. Integrating confirmed ground-truth tag recordings as a reference space enabled previously unseen FM calls from long-term PAM recordings to be attributed by acoustic similarity to known calls while maintaining an explicit measure of uncertainty by leaving acoustically ambiguous calls unassigned. Together, these approaches provide a practical framework for more reliable call attribution, enhancing long-term PAM-based monitoring of blue and fin whales.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.