Circadian Biomarkers Before and After the Transition to Spring Daylight Saving Time.

IF 1.6 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Science Pub Date : 2026-09-15 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0046-1824546
Mark S Rea, John D Bullough, Mariana G Figueiro
{"title":"Circadian Biomarkers Before and After the Transition to Spring Daylight Saving Time.","authors":"Mark S Rea, John D Bullough, Mariana G Figueiro","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1824546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Periodically, concerns are raised within the research community about the effects on circadian and sleep-related outcomes resulting from changes to and from daylight saving time (DST). To better understand these concerns, we collected varied circadian and sleep-related outcomes from healthy individuals immediately before and after the spring DST transition.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Subjects wore calibrated, personal light sensors that measured light exposure (amount, duration, time) and wrist actigraphs to quantify the synchrony between the 24-hour light-dark exposure and the 24-hour activity-rest cycles. Sleep onset, offset, and time in bed were obtained from the wrist actigraphs. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was also measured before and after DST transition. Predicted minimum core body temperature (CBT <sub>min</sub> <sup>p</sup> ) times were calculated from the light exposure data. Karolinska Sleepiness Score (KSS) ratings were collected four times a day. Health-related outcomes were not examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spring DST transition had modest (statistically insignificant) effects on the weekly averages of time in bed (≤ 21 min), subjective sleepiness (KSS < 0.48), and the synchrony between the light and activity cycles (phasor magnitude ≤ 0.08 units). After the transition to DST, CBT <sub>min</sub> <sup>p</sup> was slightly delayed, whereas DLMO and mid-sleep were slightly advanced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For this cohort, the spring transition to DST had little if any effect on a variety of circadian and sleep-related outcomes. The transition appears to have caused a small disassociation in the relative timing of the circadian phase markers, which may or may not be of some significance for health and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"19 2","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1824546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Periodically, concerns are raised within the research community about the effects on circadian and sleep-related outcomes resulting from changes to and from daylight saving time (DST). To better understand these concerns, we collected varied circadian and sleep-related outcomes from healthy individuals immediately before and after the spring DST transition.

Materials and methods: Subjects wore calibrated, personal light sensors that measured light exposure (amount, duration, time) and wrist actigraphs to quantify the synchrony between the 24-hour light-dark exposure and the 24-hour activity-rest cycles. Sleep onset, offset, and time in bed were obtained from the wrist actigraphs. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was also measured before and after DST transition. Predicted minimum core body temperature (CBT min p ) times were calculated from the light exposure data. Karolinska Sleepiness Score (KSS) ratings were collected four times a day. Health-related outcomes were not examined.

Results: The spring DST transition had modest (statistically insignificant) effects on the weekly averages of time in bed (≤ 21 min), subjective sleepiness (KSS < 0.48), and the synchrony between the light and activity cycles (phasor magnitude ≤ 0.08 units). After the transition to DST, CBT min p was slightly delayed, whereas DLMO and mid-sleep were slightly advanced.

Conclusion: For this cohort, the spring transition to DST had little if any effect on a variety of circadian and sleep-related outcomes. The transition appears to have caused a small disassociation in the relative timing of the circadian phase markers, which may or may not be of some significance for health and wellbeing.

向春季夏时制过渡前后的昼夜节律生物标志物。
目的:周期性地,研究界对日光节约时间(DST)的改变对昼夜节律和睡眠相关结果的影响提出了关注。为了更好地理解这些担忧,我们收集了健康个体在春季夏时制转换前后的各种昼夜节律和睡眠相关结果。材料和方法:受试者佩戴校准的个人光传感器,测量光暴露(量、持续时间、时间)和手腕活动记录仪,以量化24小时光-暗暴露与24小时活动-休息周期之间的同步。从腕部活动记录仪获得睡眠开始、偏移和卧床时间。昏暗灯光褪黑素发作(DLMO)也在夏时制转换前后进行了测量。根据光照数据计算预测的最低核心体温(CBT min p)时间。卡罗林斯卡嗜睡评分(KSS)评分每天收集四次。没有检查与健康相关的结果。结果:春季夏令时转换对每周平均卧床时间(≤21分钟),主观嗜睡(KSS min p)略有延迟,而DLMO和中期睡眠略有提前(统计学上不显著)。结论:对于这个队列,春季过渡到夏令时对各种昼夜节律和睡眠相关的结果几乎没有影响。这种转变似乎在昼夜节律阶段标记的相对时间上造成了一个小的分离,这可能对健康和福祉有意义,也可能没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书