{"title":"Circadian Biomarkers Before and After the Transition to Spring Daylight Saving Time.","authors":"Mark S Rea, John D Bullough, Mariana G Figueiro","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1824546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Periodically, concerns are raised within the research community about the effects on circadian and sleep-related outcomes resulting from changes to and from daylight saving time (DST). To better understand these concerns, we collected varied circadian and sleep-related outcomes from healthy individuals immediately before and after the spring DST transition.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Subjects wore calibrated, personal light sensors that measured light exposure (amount, duration, time) and wrist actigraphs to quantify the synchrony between the 24-hour light-dark exposure and the 24-hour activity-rest cycles. Sleep onset, offset, and time in bed were obtained from the wrist actigraphs. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was also measured before and after DST transition. Predicted minimum core body temperature (CBT <sub>min</sub> <sup>p</sup> ) times were calculated from the light exposure data. Karolinska Sleepiness Score (KSS) ratings were collected four times a day. Health-related outcomes were not examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spring DST transition had modest (statistically insignificant) effects on the weekly averages of time in bed (≤ 21 min), subjective sleepiness (KSS < 0.48), and the synchrony between the light and activity cycles (phasor magnitude ≤ 0.08 units). After the transition to DST, CBT <sub>min</sub> <sup>p</sup> was slightly delayed, whereas DLMO and mid-sleep were slightly advanced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For this cohort, the spring transition to DST had little if any effect on a variety of circadian and sleep-related outcomes. The transition appears to have caused a small disassociation in the relative timing of the circadian phase markers, which may or may not be of some significance for health and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"19 2","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1824546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Periodically, concerns are raised within the research community about the effects on circadian and sleep-related outcomes resulting from changes to and from daylight saving time (DST). To better understand these concerns, we collected varied circadian and sleep-related outcomes from healthy individuals immediately before and after the spring DST transition.
Materials and methods: Subjects wore calibrated, personal light sensors that measured light exposure (amount, duration, time) and wrist actigraphs to quantify the synchrony between the 24-hour light-dark exposure and the 24-hour activity-rest cycles. Sleep onset, offset, and time in bed were obtained from the wrist actigraphs. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was also measured before and after DST transition. Predicted minimum core body temperature (CBT minp ) times were calculated from the light exposure data. Karolinska Sleepiness Score (KSS) ratings were collected four times a day. Health-related outcomes were not examined.
Results: The spring DST transition had modest (statistically insignificant) effects on the weekly averages of time in bed (≤ 21 min), subjective sleepiness (KSS < 0.48), and the synchrony between the light and activity cycles (phasor magnitude ≤ 0.08 units). After the transition to DST, CBT minp was slightly delayed, whereas DLMO and mid-sleep were slightly advanced.
Conclusion: For this cohort, the spring transition to DST had little if any effect on a variety of circadian and sleep-related outcomes. The transition appears to have caused a small disassociation in the relative timing of the circadian phase markers, which may or may not be of some significance for health and wellbeing.
目的:周期性地,研究界对日光节约时间(DST)的改变对昼夜节律和睡眠相关结果的影响提出了关注。为了更好地理解这些担忧,我们收集了健康个体在春季夏时制转换前后的各种昼夜节律和睡眠相关结果。材料和方法:受试者佩戴校准的个人光传感器,测量光暴露(量、持续时间、时间)和手腕活动记录仪,以量化24小时光-暗暴露与24小时活动-休息周期之间的同步。从腕部活动记录仪获得睡眠开始、偏移和卧床时间。昏暗灯光褪黑素发作(DLMO)也在夏时制转换前后进行了测量。根据光照数据计算预测的最低核心体温(CBT min p)时间。卡罗林斯卡嗜睡评分(KSS)评分每天收集四次。没有检查与健康相关的结果。结果:春季夏令时转换对每周平均卧床时间(≤21分钟),主观嗜睡(KSS min p)略有延迟,而DLMO和中期睡眠略有提前(统计学上不显著)。结论:对于这个队列,春季过渡到夏令时对各种昼夜节律和睡眠相关的结果几乎没有影响。这种转变似乎在昼夜节律阶段标记的相对时间上造成了一个小的分离,这可能对健康和福祉有意义,也可能没有。