Alejandro Aparici-Gil, Marta M Perez, Estefania Peña
{"title":"Nonlinear viscoelastic effects of fascia: experimental findings and constitutive modelling.","authors":"Alejandro Aparici-Gil, Marta M Perez, Estefania Peña","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2026.0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study provides a comprehensive biomechanical characterization of the fascia lata, integrating systematic stress-relaxation protocols and, for the first time, dynamic mechanical analysis to resolve its complex dissipative mechanisms. Experimental tests were conducted along both longitudinal and transverse fibre orientations across multiple strain levels and frequencies to assess the synergistic effects of anisotropy, strain magnitude and loading rate. To describe these phenomena, three visco-hyperelastic constitutive frameworks were developed and compared: a first-order linear model (n=1), a generalized Maxwell model with two internal variables (n=2) and a nonlinear strain-dependent formulation. Results reveal a marked anisotropic viscoelastic profile, with the transverse direction exhibiting a significantly higher relaxation capacity (ratio of 0.666±0.144 at 2.5% strain) compared to the longitudinal axis (0.817±0.049), driven by the viscous flow of the interfibrillar ground substance. Although the tissue demonstrated marginal nonlinear viscoelasticity, the linear n=2 model outperformed the nonlinear n=1 framework, achieving superior predictive fidelity (R2=0.7321, NRMSE=0.1216 versus R2=0.7200, RMSE=0.2949 MPa). Results indicate that spectral refinement outweighs nonlinear complexity in this context. Specifically, the dual-branch linear approach captures the tissue's fundamental dissipation more effectively than a single-branch nonlinear formulation, which tends towards over-parametrization.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"23 242","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2026.0078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive biomechanical characterization of the fascia lata, integrating systematic stress-relaxation protocols and, for the first time, dynamic mechanical analysis to resolve its complex dissipative mechanisms. Experimental tests were conducted along both longitudinal and transverse fibre orientations across multiple strain levels and frequencies to assess the synergistic effects of anisotropy, strain magnitude and loading rate. To describe these phenomena, three visco-hyperelastic constitutive frameworks were developed and compared: a first-order linear model (n=1), a generalized Maxwell model with two internal variables (n=2) and a nonlinear strain-dependent formulation. Results reveal a marked anisotropic viscoelastic profile, with the transverse direction exhibiting a significantly higher relaxation capacity (ratio of 0.666±0.144 at 2.5% strain) compared to the longitudinal axis (0.817±0.049), driven by the viscous flow of the interfibrillar ground substance. Although the tissue demonstrated marginal nonlinear viscoelasticity, the linear n=2 model outperformed the nonlinear n=1 framework, achieving superior predictive fidelity (R2=0.7321, NRMSE=0.1216 versus R2=0.7200, RMSE=0.2949 MPa). Results indicate that spectral refinement outweighs nonlinear complexity in this context. Specifically, the dual-branch linear approach captures the tissue's fundamental dissipation more effectively than a single-branch nonlinear formulation, which tends towards over-parametrization.
期刊介绍:
J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.