The Prejudice-Based Secondary Victimization of Violence Against Gay Men.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Karla Santos Mateus, Emerson Do Bú, Rui Costa-Lopes, Francisca Ádila Dos Santos, Estela Mirian Lima da Silva, Cicero Roberto Pereira
{"title":"The Prejudice-Based Secondary Victimization of Violence Against Gay Men.","authors":"Karla Santos Mateus, Emerson Do Bú, Rui Costa-Lopes, Francisca Ádila Dos Santos, Estela Mirian Lima da Silva, Cicero Roberto Pereira","doi":"10.1177/08862605261476698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gay men frequently face targeted violence and subsequent secondary victimization-additional harm through negative social reactions such as minimizing their suffering, blaming them, or withholding support. While homophobic prejudice and the belief in a just world (BJW)-the motivation to see the world as fair and to believe that people get what they deserve-are each linked to victim derogation, their joint role in secondary victimization remains unclear. Across two studies, this research aimed to address this gap examining whether prejudice or BJW plays a more significant role in the secondary victimization of gay men and how these factors interact to reinforce victim-blaming attitudes. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 102), participants read a news vignette about an assault; we manipulated perceived sexual orientation (gay vs. no-cue control) via contextual cues. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 205), no cues were provided, and participants inferred the victim's sexual orientation. Secondary victimization was assessed across three dimensions (minimization of the victim's suffering, victim-blaming, and social avoidance) of a self-report measure, and prejudice was measured with a validated self-report scale indexing discomfort with gay men in everyday situations. Results showed that prejudice predicted greater minimization of suffering and victim-blaming when the victim was perceived as gay. Moreover, BJW strengthened the prejudice-minimization link when participants perceived the victim as a gay man. These findings demonstrate how prejudice and BJW jointly contribute to rationalizing harm toward gay men, reframing unjust suffering as deserved within a perceived fair world. By highlighting this interaction, our findings advance theories of legitimation and reveal how justice motives can paradoxically reinforce prejudice, subtly validating discriminatory attitudes while maintaining a veneer of fairness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605261476698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261476698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gay men frequently face targeted violence and subsequent secondary victimization-additional harm through negative social reactions such as minimizing their suffering, blaming them, or withholding support. While homophobic prejudice and the belief in a just world (BJW)-the motivation to see the world as fair and to believe that people get what they deserve-are each linked to victim derogation, their joint role in secondary victimization remains unclear. Across two studies, this research aimed to address this gap examining whether prejudice or BJW plays a more significant role in the secondary victimization of gay men and how these factors interact to reinforce victim-blaming attitudes. In Study 1 (N = 102), participants read a news vignette about an assault; we manipulated perceived sexual orientation (gay vs. no-cue control) via contextual cues. In Study 2 (N = 205), no cues were provided, and participants inferred the victim's sexual orientation. Secondary victimization was assessed across three dimensions (minimization of the victim's suffering, victim-blaming, and social avoidance) of a self-report measure, and prejudice was measured with a validated self-report scale indexing discomfort with gay men in everyday situations. Results showed that prejudice predicted greater minimization of suffering and victim-blaming when the victim was perceived as gay. Moreover, BJW strengthened the prejudice-minimization link when participants perceived the victim as a gay man. These findings demonstrate how prejudice and BJW jointly contribute to rationalizing harm toward gay men, reframing unjust suffering as deserved within a perceived fair world. By highlighting this interaction, our findings advance theories of legitimation and reveal how justice motives can paradoxically reinforce prejudice, subtly validating discriminatory attitudes while maintaining a veneer of fairness.

基于偏见的暴力对男同性恋者的二次伤害。
男同性恋者经常面临有针对性的暴力和随后的二次伤害——通过负面的社会反应,如最小化他们的痛苦,指责他们,或拒绝支持他们,造成额外的伤害。虽然对同性恋的偏见和对公正世界的信念(BJW)——认为世界是公平的,相信人们得到他们应得的——都与受害者的贬损有关,但它们在二次受害者中的共同作用尚不清楚。通过两项研究,本研究旨在解决这一差距,研究偏见或BJW在男同性恋者的二次受害中起着更重要的作用,以及这些因素如何相互作用以加强受害者责备态度。在研究1 (N = 102)中,参与者阅读了一篇关于性侵犯的新闻短文;我们通过语境线索操纵感知性取向(同性恋与无线索对照)。在研究2 (N = 205)中,没有提供线索,参与者推断受害者的性取向。二次受害是通过自我报告测量的三个维度来评估的(最小化受害者的痛苦,受害者的责备和社会回避),偏见是通过一个有效的自我报告量表来衡量的,该量表指的是在日常情况下对男同性恋者的不适。结果表明,当受害者被认为是同性恋时,偏见预示着更大程度上减少痛苦和指责受害者。此外,当参与者认为受害者是同性恋者时,BJW加强了偏见最小化的联系。这些发现表明,偏见和同性恋是如何共同促成对男同性恋者的伤害合理化的,在一个被认为公平的世界里,重新塑造了不公正的痛苦。通过强调这种相互作用,我们的研究结果推进了合法化理论,并揭示了正义动机如何矛盾地强化偏见,在保持公平外表的同时巧妙地证实了歧视态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书