Capillary blood sampling in neurodegenerative diseases - the future for screening and monitoring brain health?

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sophie Hicks, Barbara Fernandes Gomes, Amanda Heslegrave
{"title":"Capillary blood sampling in neurodegenerative diseases - the future for screening and monitoring brain health?","authors":"Sophie Hicks, Barbara Fernandes Gomes, Amanda Heslegrave","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2026.2734450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blood-based biomarkers are becoming increasingly utilized in the neurodegenerative research field for indicating patient disease status. With increasing emphasis on large-scale prevention trials, developing cost-effective and accessible means of sampling for these biomarkers is imperative. Micro-sampling, in the form of dried blood spots (DBS), dried plasma spots (DPS), and upper-arm devices (UAD), could be a solution.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Herein, the authors review recent studies that have explored the validity of DBS, DPS and UAD for detecting neurodegenerative blood biomarkers. Overall, DPS and UAD present most potential, with good to excellent correlation of pTau-217, NfL, and GFAP to concentrations in gold-standard venous plasma or CSF. However, while these results show exciting promise for implementing micro-samples, there are limitations regarding sample variability, storage, and handling.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There is still significant work needed to validate DPS and UAD sampling: current research is fragmented and with varying cohorts, there is no standardized methodology for micro-sample extraction and analysis, and lack of knowledge of the influence of pre-analytical handling means that wide implementation for trials is currently restricted. But current efforts from research groups and industry suggest that capillary micro-samples have great potential for detecting a broad range of biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2026.2734450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Blood-based biomarkers are becoming increasingly utilized in the neurodegenerative research field for indicating patient disease status. With increasing emphasis on large-scale prevention trials, developing cost-effective and accessible means of sampling for these biomarkers is imperative. Micro-sampling, in the form of dried blood spots (DBS), dried plasma spots (DPS), and upper-arm devices (UAD), could be a solution.

Areas covered: Herein, the authors review recent studies that have explored the validity of DBS, DPS and UAD for detecting neurodegenerative blood biomarkers. Overall, DPS and UAD present most potential, with good to excellent correlation of pTau-217, NfL, and GFAP to concentrations in gold-standard venous plasma or CSF. However, while these results show exciting promise for implementing micro-samples, there are limitations regarding sample variability, storage, and handling.

Expert opinion: There is still significant work needed to validate DPS and UAD sampling: current research is fragmented and with varying cohorts, there is no standardized methodology for micro-sample extraction and analysis, and lack of knowledge of the influence of pre-analytical handling means that wide implementation for trials is currently restricted. But current efforts from research groups and industry suggest that capillary micro-samples have great potential for detecting a broad range of biomarkers.

神经退行性疾病的毛细血管采血——筛查和监测大脑健康的未来?
基于血液的生物标志物越来越多地用于神经退行性研究领域,以指示患者的疾病状态。随着对大规模预防试验的日益重视,为这些生物标志物开发具有成本效益和可获得的采样方法势在必行。以干血斑(DBS)、干血浆斑(DPS)和上臂装置(UAD)形式进行的微采样可能是一种解决方案。涵盖领域:在此,作者回顾了最近的研究,探讨了DBS, DPS和UAD检测神经退行性血液生物标志物的有效性。总的来说,DPS和UAD最有潜力,pTau-217、NfL和GFAP与金标准静脉血浆或脑脊液浓度有良好到极好的相关性。然而,虽然这些结果显示了实现微样品的令人兴奋的前景,但在样品可变性,存储和处理方面存在局限性。专家意见:仍有大量工作需要验证DPS和UAD取样:目前的研究是碎片化的,具有不同的队列,没有标准化的微样品提取和分析方法,缺乏对分析前处理影响的认识,这意味着目前试验的广泛实施受到限制。但目前研究小组和工业界的努力表明,毛细管微样品在检测广泛的生物标志物方面具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书