FAIR by design (TRACE): A Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Marcel Müller, Benjamin P Geisler, Samar Shamas, Nikolaus V Bomhard, Eva Hoster, Markus Pfirrmann, Ulrich Mansmann
{"title":"FAIR by design (TRACE): A Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment.","authors":"Marcel Müller, Benjamin P Geisler, Samar Shamas, Nikolaus V Bomhard, Eva Hoster, Markus Pfirrmann, Ulrich Mansmann","doi":"10.1186/s12911-026-03840-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tension exists between the open science imperative for data transparency through FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data sharing and the stringent requirements of current data protection regulations for health data. Researchers lack efficient yet affordable tools to share sensitive data responsibly. Existing solutions are often either difficult to use, expensive, or lack features like variable-level access control and auditable and reproducible workflows. Our objective was to develop a solution that lowers the threshold for researchers to share sensitive data responsibly and that can be operated by existing institutional staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TRACE (Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment) was designed to support several data-sharing elements highlighted in the 2025 SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statements by providing controlled and auditable workflows and supporting reproducibility at the level of data and analysis code. Its features for data governance, sharing, reproducibility and security allow institutions to manage study data access and to establish consistent, transparent standard operating procedures through granular variable selection, integrated study visualisation, and provisioning into a sealed analysis environment. TRACE provides an automated workflow for selected data-access steps that had previously relied on manual curation and ad-hoc sharing. A core feature versions datasets together with the corresponding analysis scripts, supporting reproducibility at the level of data and code; the computational environment is not captured. TRACE has supported data governance across seven clinical studies and processed 56 data access applications. Across three studies, an uncontrolled before-and-after comparison found 42.4 manual interface exports per 30 days before TRACE and 4.7 after implementation; causality cannot be inferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Platforms like TRACE may help shift resource-intensive, expert-dependent data governance towards automated processes. Operated by existing institutional staff, TRACE may make controlled data sharing feasible for institutions with limited resources. By automating previously manual steps, TRACE is intended to reduce the administrative burden of governed data sharing; whether it shortens the interval from data request to analysis has not been measured. TRACE is used as a training environment for preparing and using data in sharing processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13576130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03840-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A tension exists between the open science imperative for data transparency through FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data sharing and the stringent requirements of current data protection regulations for health data. Researchers lack efficient yet affordable tools to share sensitive data responsibly. Existing solutions are often either difficult to use, expensive, or lack features like variable-level access control and auditable and reproducible workflows. Our objective was to develop a solution that lowers the threshold for researchers to share sensitive data responsibly and that can be operated by existing institutional staff.

Results: TRACE (Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment) was designed to support several data-sharing elements highlighted in the 2025 SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statements by providing controlled and auditable workflows and supporting reproducibility at the level of data and analysis code. Its features for data governance, sharing, reproducibility and security allow institutions to manage study data access and to establish consistent, transparent standard operating procedures through granular variable selection, integrated study visualisation, and provisioning into a sealed analysis environment. TRACE provides an automated workflow for selected data-access steps that had previously relied on manual curation and ad-hoc sharing. A core feature versions datasets together with the corresponding analysis scripts, supporting reproducibility at the level of data and code; the computational environment is not captured. TRACE has supported data governance across seven clinical studies and processed 56 data access applications. Across three studies, an uncontrolled before-and-after comparison found 42.4 manual interface exports per 30 days before TRACE and 4.7 after implementation; causality cannot be inferred.

Conclusions: Platforms like TRACE may help shift resource-intensive, expert-dependent data governance towards automated processes. Operated by existing institutional staff, TRACE may make controlled data sharing feasible for institutions with limited resources. By automating previously manual steps, TRACE is intended to reduce the administrative burden of governed data sharing; whether it shortens the interval from data request to analysis has not been measured. TRACE is used as a training environment for preparing and using data in sharing processes.

公平设计(TRACE):一个值得信赖的研究访问和协作环境。
背景:通过公平(可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重复使用)数据共享实现数据透明度的开放科学要求与当前健康数据数据保护法规的严格要求之间存在紧张关系。研究人员缺乏有效且负担得起的工具来负责任地共享敏感数据。现有的解决方案通常要么难以使用,要么价格昂贵,要么缺乏诸如可变级别访问控制以及可审计和可重复的工作流等特性。我们的目标是开发一种解决方案,降低研究人员负责任地共享敏感数据的门槛,并可由现有机构员工操作。结果:TRACE(可信研究访问和协作环境)旨在通过提供受控和可审计的工作流程以及支持数据和分析代码级别的可重复性,支持2025 SPIRIT(标准协议项目:干预性试验建议)和CONSORT(综合报告试验标准)声明中强调的几个数据共享元素。它在数据治理、共享、可再现性和安全性方面的功能使机构能够管理研究数据访问,并通过细粒度变量选择、集成研究可视化和提供密封分析环境来建立一致、透明的标准操作程序。TRACE为选定的数据访问步骤提供了一个自动化的工作流,这些步骤以前依赖于手动管理和临时共享。核心功能版本数据集以及相应的分析脚本,支持数据和代码级别的再现性;计算环境没有被捕获。TRACE支持七项临床研究的数据治理,并处理了56个数据访问应用程序。在三项研究中,一项不受控制的前后比较发现,TRACE实施前每30天输出42.4个手动界面,实施后每30天输出4.7个;因果关系不能推断。结论:像TRACE这样的平台可能有助于将资源密集型、依赖专家的数据治理转向自动化流程。TRACE由现有的机构工作人员操作,可以使资源有限的机构实现受控的数据共享。通过自动化以前的手动步骤,TRACE旨在减少受治理数据共享的管理负担;它是否缩短了从数据请求到分析的时间间隔尚未测量。TRACE被用作在共享过程中准备和使用数据的培训环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书