{"title":"Structured exercise interventions and survival outcomes in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Chih-Chen Tzang, Chiao-An Luo, Vicky Fu-Hsuan Kuo, Ewen Shengyao Huang, Yuan-Fu Kang, Wen-Yu Su, Yu-Lin Chen, Wei-Le Lin, Wei-Chen Lin, Bor-Show Tzang, Tsai-Ching Hsu","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2026-111664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Structured exercise is widely recommended in oncology care to improve quality of life and physical function, but its definitive role as a therapeutic intervention to prolong survival remains uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the association between structured exercise interventions and survival related outcomes in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov covering reports from database inception to 20 December 2025.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of structured exercise interventions in adults with confirmed cancer, reporting survival or pathological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Structured exercise was associated with significant improvements in overall survival (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.92; 11 RCTs, n=3828), disease-free survival (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95; 7 RCTs, n=5077), reduced all cause mortality (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.97; 13 RCTs, n=5492) and reduced cancer specific mortality (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96; 6 RCTs, n=2048), but not with progression-free survival or pathological complete response. Certainty of evidence, assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), was rated as moderate for overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer specific and all cause mortality. Further exploratory analyses indicated a more pronounced benefit among participants with higher adherence, those who underwent aerobic exercise and those with early stage disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support consideration of structured exercise as an effective adjuvant therapy in oncological care, with potential survival and recurrence benefits that extend beyond its traditional role in improving quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251245153.</p>","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1434-1442"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2026-111664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Structured exercise is widely recommended in oncology care to improve quality of life and physical function, but its definitive role as a therapeutic intervention to prolong survival remains uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the association between structured exercise interventions and survival related outcomes in patients with cancer.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov covering reports from database inception to 20 December 2025.
Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of structured exercise interventions in adults with confirmed cancer, reporting survival or pathological outcomes.
Results: 21 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Structured exercise was associated with significant improvements in overall survival (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.92; 11 RCTs, n=3828), disease-free survival (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95; 7 RCTs, n=5077), reduced all cause mortality (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.97; 13 RCTs, n=5492) and reduced cancer specific mortality (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96; 6 RCTs, n=2048), but not with progression-free survival or pathological complete response. Certainty of evidence, assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), was rated as moderate for overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer specific and all cause mortality. Further exploratory analyses indicated a more pronounced benefit among participants with higher adherence, those who underwent aerobic exercise and those with early stage disease.
Conclusions: These results support consideration of structured exercise as an effective adjuvant therapy in oncological care, with potential survival and recurrence benefits that extend beyond its traditional role in improving quality of life.
期刊介绍：
The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
