Up is down: testing the equivalence in dental wear patterns of the upper and lower carnassial

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Cecilia Loddi, Riccardo Stefani, Lorenzo Rook, Saverio Bartolini-Lucenti
{"title":"Up is down: testing the equivalence in dental wear patterns of the upper and lower carnassial","authors":"Cecilia Loddi,&nbsp;Riccardo Stefani,&nbsp;Lorenzo Rook,&nbsp;Saverio Bartolini-Lucenti","doi":"10.1007/s00114-026-02158-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The analysis of dental microwear is widely applied to reconstruct the diet of different fossil species. Dental microwear is usually sampled on worn facets, that are produced during food processing. To maximize the sample size, tooth wear is sampled on upper and lower teeth assuming equality in wear patterns between two homologous opposite facets. Anyhow, previous research on fossil herbivores have highlighted potential discrepancies between upper and lower teeth, particularly in non-homologous facets, raising questions about the validity of this practice. Here we test if wear of the homologous facets of the slicing portion of the carnassials in four species of extant carnivores can be analysed without distinction, resulting in the same ecological evidence. To achieve a high-resolution representation of these patterns, we used Dental Microwear Texture Analysis. The results of similarity tests validated that there is no statistically significant difference between SSFA attributes and, moreover, they are equivalent. This statistical equivalence opens new possibilities for the future by effectively doubling the data availability, at least for extant carnivores. In addition, it can help overcome the scarcity of data on tooth wear in fossil carnivores.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":794,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Nature","volume":"113 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-026-02158-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of dental microwear is widely applied to reconstruct the diet of different fossil species. Dental microwear is usually sampled on worn facets, that are produced during food processing. To maximize the sample size, tooth wear is sampled on upper and lower teeth assuming equality in wear patterns between two homologous opposite facets. Anyhow, previous research on fossil herbivores have highlighted potential discrepancies between upper and lower teeth, particularly in non-homologous facets, raising questions about the validity of this practice. Here we test if wear of the homologous facets of the slicing portion of the carnassials in four species of extant carnivores can be analysed without distinction, resulting in the same ecological evidence. To achieve a high-resolution representation of these patterns, we used Dental Microwear Texture Analysis. The results of similarity tests validated that there is no statistically significant difference between SSFA attributes and, moreover, they are equivalent. This statistical equivalence opens new possibilities for the future by effectively doubling the data availability, at least for extant carnivores. In addition, it can help overcome the scarcity of data on tooth wear in fossil carnivores.

向上是向下的:测试上下鼻牙磨损模式的等效性。
牙齿微磨损分析被广泛应用于重建不同化石物种的饮食结构。牙齿微磨损通常在食品加工过程中产生的磨损面上取样。为了最大限度地扩大样本量,假设两个同源的相对切面之间的磨损模式相等,对上下牙齿的磨损进行采样。无论如何,先前对食草动物化石的研究已经强调了上下牙齿之间的潜在差异,特别是在非同源方面,这对这种做法的有效性提出了质疑。在这里,我们测试了在四种现存的食肉动物中,是否可以不区分地分析食肉动物切割部分的同源切面的磨损,从而产生相同的生态证据。为了获得这些图案的高分辨率表示,我们使用了牙齿微磨损纹理分析。相似性检验的结果验证了SSFA属性之间没有统计学上的显著差异,而且它们是等效的。这种统计上的等效性为未来打开了新的可能性,至少对现存的食肉动物来说,它有效地使数据的可用性增加了一倍。此外,它可以帮助克服化石食肉动物牙齿磨损数据的缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Science of Nature
The Science of Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Science of Nature - Naturwissenschaften - is Springer''s flagship multidisciplinary science journal. The journal is dedicated to the fast publication and global dissemination of high-quality research and invites papers, which are of interest to the broader community in the biological sciences. Contributions from the chemical, geological, and physical sciences are welcome if contributing to questions of general biological significance. Particularly welcomed are contributions that bridge between traditionally isolated areas and attempt to increase the conceptual understanding of systems and processes that demand an interdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书