Patient-ventilator asynchrony knowledge, attitudes, and practices among ICU health care professionals: questionnaire development.

Respiratory research & clinical practice Pub Date : 2026-08-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20260010
Mayson L A Sousa, Fabia Diniz-Silva, Sandra R Wilson, Juliana C Ferreira
{"title":"Patient-ventilator asynchrony knowledge, attitudes, and practices among ICU health care professionals: questionnaire development.","authors":"Mayson L A Sousa, Fabia Diniz-Silva, Sandra R Wilson, Juliana C Ferreira","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20260010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the development and validation process of a questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU health care professionals regarding patient-ventilator asynchrony.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire development study. Item generation was guided by a literature-based conceptual framework, followed by expert review to establish face and content validity. The instrument was refined through specialists in mechanical ventilation and questionnaire design. The tenth version was piloted in Portuguese among ICU health care professionals, including a 30-day test-retest assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of the questionnaire comprised 24 items (knowledge, 14 items; attitudes, 4; and practices, 6). Of the 83 ICU health care professionals who consented to participate, 49 completed at least 80% of the questionnaire twice and were included in the analysis. The knowledge section showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.73) and moderate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.67). Median knowledge scores were 71 [57-79] at test and 64 [50-79] at retest, out of 100 (p = 0.052). Attitude scores also showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81) and a moderate correlation (r = 0.60; p < 0.001), with median scores of 75 (out of 100) in both rounds. Practice item responses were generally consistent between test and retest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to patient-ventilator asynchrony among ICU health care professionals, with evidence of face and content validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":524203,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory research & clinical practice","volume":"52 3","pages":"e20260010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13568798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory research & clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20260010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development and validation process of a questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of ICU health care professionals regarding patient-ventilator asynchrony.

Methods: This was a knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire development study. Item generation was guided by a literature-based conceptual framework, followed by expert review to establish face and content validity. The instrument was refined through specialists in mechanical ventilation and questionnaire design. The tenth version was piloted in Portuguese among ICU health care professionals, including a 30-day test-retest assessment.

Results: The final version of the questionnaire comprised 24 items (knowledge, 14 items; attitudes, 4; and practices, 6). Of the 83 ICU health care professionals who consented to participate, 49 completed at least 80% of the questionnaire twice and were included in the analysis. The knowledge section showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.73) and moderate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.67). Median knowledge scores were 71 [57-79] at test and 64 [50-79] at retest, out of 100 (p = 0.052). Attitude scores also showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81) and a moderate correlation (r = 0.60; p < 0.001), with median scores of 75 (out of 100) in both rounds. Practice item responses were generally consistent between test and retest.

Conclusions: We developed a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to patient-ventilator asynchrony among ICU health care professionals, with evidence of face and content validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

ICU医护人员的患者-呼吸机同步知识、态度和实践:问卷开发
目的:描述问卷的开发和验证过程,以评估ICU卫生保健专业人员对患者-呼吸机不同步的知识、态度和实践。方法:采用知识、态度和实践问卷开发研究。项目生成由基于文献的概念框架指导,然后由专家评审来确定面孔和内容效度。该仪器通过机械通气专家和问卷设计进行了改进。第十版在葡萄牙语的ICU卫生保健专业人员中进行了试点,包括为期30天的测试-再测试评估。结果:终版问卷共24项(知识14项,态度4项,实践6项)。在83名同意参与的ICU医护人员中,49名完成了两次至少80%的问卷,并被纳入分析。知识部分具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.73)和中等的重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.48;95% CI, 0.24-0.67)。前测知识得分中位数为71[57-79],复测知识得分中位数为64[50-79],满分为100分(p = 0.052)。态度得分也显示出良好的重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.68;95% CI, 0.50-0.81)和中等相关性(r = 0.60; p < 0.001),两轮的中位数得分为75分(满分100分)。练习项目的反应在测试和重测之间基本一致。结论:我们编制了一份调查问卷,以评估ICU医护人员对患者-呼吸机不同步的知识、态度和实践,并提供了面部和内容效度、内部一致性和重测信度的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书