Defining lung function in asthma remission: Results of an international Delphi study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1080/25310429.2026.2732616
Angelica Tiotiu, Jonathan A Bernstein, David Price, Juan Carlos Ivancevich, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Fulvio Braido, Pierachille Santus, Silviya Novakova, Plamena Novakova, Stefan Frent, Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala, Andras Bikov, Herberto Jose Chong-Neto, Krzysztof Kowal, Giuseppe Liistro
{"title":"Defining lung function in asthma remission: Results of an international Delphi study.","authors":"Angelica Tiotiu, Jonathan A Bernstein, David Price, Juan Carlos Ivancevich, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Fulvio Braido, Pierachille Santus, Silviya Novakova, Plamena Novakova, Stefan Frent, Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala, Andras Bikov, Herberto Jose Chong-Neto, Krzysztof Kowal, Giuseppe Liistro","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2026.2732616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A consensual criterion regarding lung function (LF) assessment that could be included in the definition of asthma remission on treatment (tAR) is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>This work aimed to identify a criterion concerning LF evaluation corresponding to this concept.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted using the Delphi method. The scientific board established 16 candidate statements to be included in the questionnaire. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure agreement for each statement. The predefined conditions for statement selection were a median score ≥ 4 and >60% of responses indicating agreement. The survey included four rounds: three including the board members and one - 177 participants through the Interasma Scientific Network platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the first two rounds, six statements reaching consensus were included in the large survey. They incorporated various definitions used for 'normal' and 'stable' LF together with elimination of airway hyperresponsiveness and variability during bronchodilator testing. Three statements gained consensus during the third round. The final selected criterion associates 'stable LF' over time with a 'negative reversibility test' or 'negative challenge test'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This Delphi process identified a criterion based on LF assessment that may serve as support for future consensual definition of <sub>t</sub>AR after prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"32 1","pages":"2732616"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2026.2732616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A consensual criterion regarding lung function (LF) assessment that could be included in the definition of asthma remission on treatment (tAR) is currently lacking.

Research question: This work aimed to identify a criterion concerning LF evaluation corresponding to this concept.

Methods: A survey was conducted using the Delphi method. The scientific board established 16 candidate statements to be included in the questionnaire. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure agreement for each statement. The predefined conditions for statement selection were a median score ≥ 4 and >60% of responses indicating agreement. The survey included four rounds: three including the board members and one - 177 participants through the Interasma Scientific Network platform.

Results: Following the first two rounds, six statements reaching consensus were included in the large survey. They incorporated various definitions used for 'normal' and 'stable' LF together with elimination of airway hyperresponsiveness and variability during bronchodilator testing. Three statements gained consensus during the third round. The final selected criterion associates 'stable LF' over time with a 'negative reversibility test' or 'negative challenge test'.

Conclusion: This Delphi process identified a criterion based on LF assessment that may serve as support for future consensual definition of tAR after prospective validation.

哮喘缓解中肺功能的定义:一项国际德尔菲研究的结果。
背景:目前缺乏关于肺功能(LF)评估的共识标准,该标准可纳入哮喘治疗缓解(tAR)的定义。研究问题:本研究旨在确定与此概念相对应的LF评价标准。方法:采用德尔菲法进行问卷调查。科学委员会确定了16个候选陈述,将包括在问卷中。采用5分李克特量表来衡量每个陈述的一致性。语句选择的预设条件是:中位数得分≥4分,60%以上的回答表示同意。调查包括四轮:三轮包括董事会成员,一轮通过Interasma科学网络平台177名参与者。结果:继前两轮之后,六项达成共识的陈述被纳入了大调查。他们纳入了用于“正常”和“稳定”LF的各种定义,并消除了支气管扩张剂试验期间气道高反应性和变异性。在第三轮谈判中,各方达成了三项共识。最终选择的标准将“稳定的LF”随时间推移与“负可逆性测试”或“负挑战测试”联系起来。结论:该德尔菲过程确定了一个基于LF评估的标准,可作为前瞻性验证后对tAR的未来共识定义的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书