Yu Krutskikh E, V Dutov S, S Andronov A, G Martov A
{"title":"[Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Analysis of Efficacy, Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of drug preparation].","authors":"Yu Krutskikh E, V Dutov S, S Andronov A, G Martov A","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the optimal treatment for kidney stones of 5-20 mm, but the success of the intervention depends on providing access through the ureter. Traditional preoperative stenting is accompanied by stent-associated symptoms that worsen patients quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comprehensive assessment of the efficacy, safety feasibility of using Omnic Ocas for drug preparation of the ureter for RIRS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective single-center study of 58 patients divided into groups: receiving Omnic Ocas 0.4 mg/day (n=29) and prestenting group (n=29). Intra- and postoperative parameters were evaluated. Additionally, a systematic review of 10 RCTs (n=1624) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the local study, the frequency of successful ureteral access sheath installation was comparable between groups (87% vs 92%, p>0.05). The Omnic Ocas group showed significantly better pain scores (3.2+/-1.1 vs 5.9+/-1.6 points, p<0.001), need for analgesics and quality of life according to the USSQ questionnaire (22.5+/-5.7 vs 34.8+/-7.3 points, p<0.001). Systematic review confirmed the advantages of tamsulosin over no preparation and comparable efficacy with prestenting with better tolerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug preparation with Omnic Ocas is not inferior to prestenting in efficacy, but superior in tolerability and economic feasibility, being a preferred alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":23546,"journal":{"name":"Urologiia","volume":" 4","pages":"48-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the optimal treatment for kidney stones of 5-20 mm, but the success of the intervention depends on providing access through the ureter. Traditional preoperative stenting is accompanied by stent-associated symptoms that worsen patients quality of life.
Objective: Comprehensive assessment of the efficacy, safety feasibility of using Omnic Ocas for drug preparation of the ureter for RIRS.
Material and methods: A prospective single-center study of 58 patients divided into groups: receiving Omnic Ocas 0.4 mg/day (n=29) and prestenting group (n=29). Intra- and postoperative parameters were evaluated. Additionally, a systematic review of 10 RCTs (n=1624) was performed.
Results: In the local study, the frequency of successful ureteral access sheath installation was comparable between groups (87% vs 92%, p>0.05). The Omnic Ocas group showed significantly better pain scores (3.2+/-1.1 vs 5.9+/-1.6 points, p<0.001), need for analgesics and quality of life according to the USSQ questionnaire (22.5+/-5.7 vs 34.8+/-7.3 points, p<0.001). Systematic review confirmed the advantages of tamsulosin over no preparation and comparable efficacy with prestenting with better tolerability.
Conclusion: Drug preparation with Omnic Ocas is not inferior to prestenting in efficacy, but superior in tolerability and economic feasibility, being a preferred alternative.