Discovery and validation of novel plasma protein biomarkers for severe tuberculosis patients.

IF 6.2 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Yifan Hu, Yu Xue, Wei Shu, Weicong Ren, Rui Li, Zichun Ma, Ruichao Liu, Yu Pang, Liang Li
{"title":"Discovery and validation of novel plasma protein biomarkers for severe tuberculosis patients.","authors":"Yifan Hu, Yu Xue, Wei Shu, Weicong Ren, Rui Li, Zichun Ma, Ruichao Liu, Yu Pang, Liang Li","doi":"10.1007/s00011-026-02362-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Severe tuberculosis (STB) imposes a substantial disease burden, yet reliable biomarkers for distinguishing STB from mild/moderate tuberculosis (MTB) remain scarce. This study aimed to identify and independently validate plasma protein biomarkers associated with tuberculosis severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective study, 298 adults with confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled into screening (n = 128) and independent validation (n = 170) cohorts. Plasma samples were analysed using data-independent acquisition proteomics. Differentially expressed proteins were screened via Limma and four machine-learning algorithms, with candidate proteins measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed individual and combined diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>STB patients were older and presented with lymphopenia, hypoalbuminemia, neutrophilia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Among 166 differentially expressed proteins, HSPA5, HSP90B1, EEF1D, and SULT1A1 were selected for validation. In STB patients, HSPA5, HSP90B1, and EEF1D were upregulated, whereas SULT1A1 was downregulated. The four-protein panel achieved an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI 0.864-0.952), with 87.5% sensitivity and 83.8% specificity, modestly outperforming HSPA5 alone (AUC = 0.894). Functional enrichment implicated cholesterol metabolism, immune-inflammatory pathways, and endoplasmic reticulum stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The four-protein panel effectively discriminated STB from MTB; however, its marginal improvement over HSPA5 alone suggests that an HSPA5-based assay may offer a simpler, more practical, and potentially cost-effective strategy for severity stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13550,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation Research","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-026-02362-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Severe tuberculosis (STB) imposes a substantial disease burden, yet reliable biomarkers for distinguishing STB from mild/moderate tuberculosis (MTB) remain scarce. This study aimed to identify and independently validate plasma protein biomarkers associated with tuberculosis severity.

Methods: In this multicenter prospective study, 298 adults with confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled into screening (n = 128) and independent validation (n = 170) cohorts. Plasma samples were analysed using data-independent acquisition proteomics. Differentially expressed proteins were screened via Limma and four machine-learning algorithms, with candidate proteins measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed individual and combined diagnostic performance.

Results: STB patients were older and presented with lymphopenia, hypoalbuminemia, neutrophilia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Among 166 differentially expressed proteins, HSPA5, HSP90B1, EEF1D, and SULT1A1 were selected for validation. In STB patients, HSPA5, HSP90B1, and EEF1D were upregulated, whereas SULT1A1 was downregulated. The four-protein panel achieved an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI 0.864-0.952), with 87.5% sensitivity and 83.8% specificity, modestly outperforming HSPA5 alone (AUC = 0.894). Functional enrichment implicated cholesterol metabolism, immune-inflammatory pathways, and endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Conclusions: The four-protein panel effectively discriminated STB from MTB; however, its marginal improvement over HSPA5 alone suggests that an HSPA5-based assay may offer a simpler, more practical, and potentially cost-effective strategy for severity stratification.

重症肺结核患者新型血浆蛋白生物标志物的发现和验证。
目的:严重结核病(STB)造成了巨大的疾病负担,但用于区分STB和轻度/中度结核病(MTB)的可靠生物标志物仍然很少。本研究旨在鉴定并独立验证与结核病严重程度相关的血浆蛋白生物标志物。方法:在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,298名确诊肺结核的成年人被纳入筛查队列(n = 128)和独立验证队列(n = 170)。血浆样本使用数据独立采集蛋白质组学进行分析。通过Limma和四种机器学习算法筛选差异表达蛋白,并通过酶联免疫吸附法测定候选蛋白。接受者工作特征分析评估了个体和综合诊断表现。结果:STB患者年龄偏大,表现为淋巴细胞减少、低白蛋白血症、中性粒细胞增多、乳酸脱氢酶升高。在166个差异表达蛋白中,选取HSPA5、HSP90B1、EEF1D和SULT1A1进行验证。在STB患者中,HSPA5、HSP90B1和EEF1D表达上调,而SULT1A1表达下调。四蛋白组的AUC为0.908 (95% CI 0.864-0.952),敏感性为87.5%,特异性为83.8%,略优于单独使用HSPA5 (AUC = 0.894)。功能富集涉及胆固醇代谢、免疫炎症途径和内质网应激。结论:四蛋白组能有效区分STB和MTB;然而,与单独使用HSPA5相比,它的边际改进表明,基于HSPA5的检测可能提供一种更简单、更实用、潜在成本效益更高的严重程度分层策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammation Research
Inflammation Research 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Inflammation Research (IR) publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of inflammation and related fields including histopathology, immunological mechanisms, gene expression, mediators, experimental models, clinical investigations and the effect of drugs. Related fields are broadly defined and include for instance, allergy and asthma, shock, pain, joint damage, skin disease as well as clinical trials of relevant drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书