{"title":"Molecular Dynamics Study of Supramolecular Complexes to the Carbohydrate-Cation System.","authors":"Dhaidan Khalaf Kafi, Ali Taher Mohi","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.173339.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is known that calcium ions lead to aggregation of disaccharides, while magnesium ions do not. In this study, simulation results indicated that the cations primarily bind to the sulfate groups of the disaccharides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From molecular dynamics simulations, the differences between the calcium and magnesium cation systems can be explained. Additionally, when a modified water model is used in the case of the magnesium system, in which the charges of the water atoms are reduced, the magnesium ions bind the hydration shell less strongly than in the 'normal' water model, which facilitates complex formation with the disaccharides. To verify whether the stability differences between the two saccharides are also observed in the simulations, the simulations of the calcium system were repeated with the monosaccharide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moreover, result in the formation of carbohydrate-cation-carbohydrate complexes, with the disaccharides primarily binding to the glucose unit, which is attached to the sulfate group. If the cation is not present, the sulfate groups repel each other and complex formation is not possible. The differences between the two cation systems can be explained as follows: Magnesium ions bind much weaker to the disaccharide than calcium ions. The reason is that magnesium ions bind more strongly to the hydration shell due to their smaller ion radius compared to calcium ions. This is energetically more expensive in the case of magnesium ions, which leads to a kinetic hindrance of complex formation compared to the calcium system. The other significant difference between the two cation complexes is that in the case of calcium ions, both disaccharides bind directly to the cation through the sulfate groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As expected, the binding energy of the monosaccharide complex was found to be lower than that of the disaccharide complex (6 kJ/mol). The difference in binding energies between the two complexes was relatively small. A significantly lower rupture force was found in the simulations for an individual complex.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13571022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.173339.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It is known that calcium ions lead to aggregation of disaccharides, while magnesium ions do not. In this study, simulation results indicated that the cations primarily bind to the sulfate groups of the disaccharides.
Methods: From molecular dynamics simulations, the differences between the calcium and magnesium cation systems can be explained. Additionally, when a modified water model is used in the case of the magnesium system, in which the charges of the water atoms are reduced, the magnesium ions bind the hydration shell less strongly than in the 'normal' water model, which facilitates complex formation with the disaccharides. To verify whether the stability differences between the two saccharides are also observed in the simulations, the simulations of the calcium system were repeated with the monosaccharide.
Results: Moreover, result in the formation of carbohydrate-cation-carbohydrate complexes, with the disaccharides primarily binding to the glucose unit, which is attached to the sulfate group. If the cation is not present, the sulfate groups repel each other and complex formation is not possible. The differences between the two cation systems can be explained as follows: Magnesium ions bind much weaker to the disaccharide than calcium ions. The reason is that magnesium ions bind more strongly to the hydration shell due to their smaller ion radius compared to calcium ions. This is energetically more expensive in the case of magnesium ions, which leads to a kinetic hindrance of complex formation compared to the calcium system. The other significant difference between the two cation complexes is that in the case of calcium ions, both disaccharides bind directly to the cation through the sulfate groups.
Conclusions: As expected, the binding energy of the monosaccharide complex was found to be lower than that of the disaccharide complex (6 kJ/mol). The difference in binding energies between the two complexes was relatively small. A significantly lower rupture force was found in the simulations for an individual complex.
F1000ResearchPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍:
F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.