Molecular Dynamics Study of Supramolecular Complexes to the Carbohydrate-Cation System.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2026-08-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.173339.2
Dhaidan Khalaf Kafi, Ali Taher Mohi
{"title":"Molecular Dynamics Study of Supramolecular Complexes to the Carbohydrate-Cation System.","authors":"Dhaidan Khalaf Kafi, Ali Taher Mohi","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.173339.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is known that calcium ions lead to aggregation of disaccharides, while magnesium ions do not. In this study, simulation results indicated that the cations primarily bind to the sulfate groups of the disaccharides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From molecular dynamics simulations, the differences between the calcium and magnesium cation systems can be explained. Additionally, when a modified water model is used in the case of the magnesium system, in which the charges of the water atoms are reduced, the magnesium ions bind the hydration shell less strongly than in the 'normal' water model, which facilitates complex formation with the disaccharides. To verify whether the stability differences between the two saccharides are also observed in the simulations, the simulations of the calcium system were repeated with the monosaccharide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moreover, result in the formation of carbohydrate-cation-carbohydrate complexes, with the disaccharides primarily binding to the glucose unit, which is attached to the sulfate group. If the cation is not present, the sulfate groups repel each other and complex formation is not possible. The differences between the two cation systems can be explained as follows: Magnesium ions bind much weaker to the disaccharide than calcium ions. The reason is that magnesium ions bind more strongly to the hydration shell due to their smaller ion radius compared to calcium ions. This is energetically more expensive in the case of magnesium ions, which leads to a kinetic hindrance of complex formation compared to the calcium system. The other significant difference between the two cation complexes is that in the case of calcium ions, both disaccharides bind directly to the cation through the sulfate groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As expected, the binding energy of the monosaccharide complex was found to be lower than that of the disaccharide complex (6 kJ/mol). The difference in binding energies between the two complexes was relatively small. A significantly lower rupture force was found in the simulations for an individual complex.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13571022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.173339.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is known that calcium ions lead to aggregation of disaccharides, while magnesium ions do not. In this study, simulation results indicated that the cations primarily bind to the sulfate groups of the disaccharides.

Methods: From molecular dynamics simulations, the differences between the calcium and magnesium cation systems can be explained. Additionally, when a modified water model is used in the case of the magnesium system, in which the charges of the water atoms are reduced, the magnesium ions bind the hydration shell less strongly than in the 'normal' water model, which facilitates complex formation with the disaccharides. To verify whether the stability differences between the two saccharides are also observed in the simulations, the simulations of the calcium system were repeated with the monosaccharide.

Results: Moreover, result in the formation of carbohydrate-cation-carbohydrate complexes, with the disaccharides primarily binding to the glucose unit, which is attached to the sulfate group. If the cation is not present, the sulfate groups repel each other and complex formation is not possible. The differences between the two cation systems can be explained as follows: Magnesium ions bind much weaker to the disaccharide than calcium ions. The reason is that magnesium ions bind more strongly to the hydration shell due to their smaller ion radius compared to calcium ions. This is energetically more expensive in the case of magnesium ions, which leads to a kinetic hindrance of complex formation compared to the calcium system. The other significant difference between the two cation complexes is that in the case of calcium ions, both disaccharides bind directly to the cation through the sulfate groups.

Conclusions: As expected, the binding energy of the monosaccharide complex was found to be lower than that of the disaccharide complex (6 kJ/mol). The difference in binding energies between the two complexes was relatively small. A significantly lower rupture force was found in the simulations for an individual complex.

碳水化合物-阳离子体系超分子配合物的分子动力学研究。
背景:众所周知,钙离子导致双糖聚集,而镁离子不会。在本研究中,模拟结果表明,阳离子主要与双糖的硫酸盐基团结合。方法:通过分子动力学模拟来解释钙和镁阳离子体系之间的差异。此外,当在镁体系中使用改进的水模型时,水原子的电荷减少,镁离子与水化壳的结合强度低于“正常”水模型,这有利于与双糖形成复合物。为了验证模拟中是否也观察到两种糖之间的稳定性差异,我们用单糖重复了钙体系的模拟。结果:此外,还会形成碳水化合物-阳离子-碳水化合物复合物,其中双糖主要与葡萄糖单元结合,葡萄糖单元与硫酸盐基团相连。如果阳离子不存在,硫酸盐基团相互排斥,复合物的形成是不可能的。两种阳离子体系之间的差异可以解释如下:镁离子与双糖的结合比钙离子弱得多。原因是镁离子与水合壳的结合更强,因为它们的离子半径比钙离子小。在镁离子的情况下,这在能量上更昂贵,与钙系统相比,这导致了络合物形成的动力学障碍。这两种阳离子配合物的另一个显著区别是,在钙离子的情况下,两种双糖都通过硫酸盐基团直接与阳离子结合。结论:正如预期的那样,单糖复合物的结合能低于双糖复合物的结合能(6 kJ/mol)。这两种配合物的结合能差异相对较小。在单个复合物的模拟中发现了明显较低的破裂力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书