Emergency department revisits and hospital readmissions following a fall-related emergency department presentation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Chris Larue, Lotte Jonkman, Bjorn Winkens, Sofie Jansen, Nathalie van der Velde, Gideon H P Latten, Bart Spaetgens
{"title":"Emergency department revisits and hospital readmissions following a fall-related emergency department presentation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chris Larue, Lotte Jonkman, Bjorn Winkens, Sofie Jansen, Nathalie van der Velde, Gideon H P Latten, Bart Spaetgens","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afag271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits in older adults, yet subsequent trajectories of acute care use remain poorly characterised. We aimed to estimate pooled proportions of ED revisits and hospital readmissions at multiple follow-up intervals within 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251167449), we searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus from inception to 30 November 2025 for observational studies including adults aged ≥65 years presenting to the ED after an index fall. Eligible studies reported ED revisits and/or hospital readmissions within 1 year. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted for each follow-up interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies (20 publications) were included, with overall low to moderate risk of bias. The cumulative proportions of patients experiencing an ED revisit increased with longer follow-up, from 3.9% within 3 days to 8.8% within 7 days, 15.0% within 30 days and 21.7% within 90 days (single study), reaching 37.5% at 6 months and 41.3% at 12 months. Hospital readmissions similarly increased from 10.4% at 30 days to 30.4% at 6 months and 31.9% at 12 months (single study). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across several pooled analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A fall-related ED presentation is associated with substantial cumulative acute care use over the following year. Falls may represent an important marker of broader vulnerability and ongoing healthcare needs. Future research should identify patients at high risk of recurrent acute care use and determine whether targeted follow-up reduces recurrent ED visits and hospital readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"55 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13574242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Falls are a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits in older adults, yet subsequent trajectories of acute care use remain poorly characterised. We aimed to estimate pooled proportions of ED revisits and hospital readmissions at multiple follow-up intervals within 1 year.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251167449), we searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus from inception to 30 November 2025 for observational studies including adults aged ≥65 years presenting to the ED after an index fall. Eligible studies reported ED revisits and/or hospital readmissions within 1 year. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted for each follow-up interval.

Results: Nineteen studies (20 publications) were included, with overall low to moderate risk of bias. The cumulative proportions of patients experiencing an ED revisit increased with longer follow-up, from 3.9% within 3 days to 8.8% within 7 days, 15.0% within 30 days and 21.7% within 90 days (single study), reaching 37.5% at 6 months and 41.3% at 12 months. Hospital readmissions similarly increased from 10.4% at 30 days to 30.4% at 6 months and 31.9% at 12 months (single study). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across several pooled analyses.

Conclusion: A fall-related ED presentation is associated with substantial cumulative acute care use over the following year. Falls may represent an important marker of broader vulnerability and ongoing healthcare needs. Future research should identify patients at high risk of recurrent acute care use and determine whether targeted follow-up reduces recurrent ED visits and hospital readmissions.

老年人跌倒相关急诊科表现后急诊科复诊和再入院:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:跌倒是老年人急诊科(ED)就诊的主要原因,但随后的急性护理使用轨迹仍然缺乏特征。我们的目的是估计1年内多个随访间隔的急诊科复诊和再入院的合并比例。方法:在这项系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO: CRD420251167449)中,我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Scopus从成立到2025年11月30日的观察性研究,包括年龄≥65岁的成年人在指数下降后出现ED。符合条件的研究报告了1年内急诊科复诊和/或再入院。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。对每个随访时间间隔进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:纳入了19项研究(20篇出版物),总体偏倚风险为中低。随着随访时间的延长,患者经历ED重访的累积比例增加,从3天内的3.9%增加到7天内的8.8%,30天内的15.0%和90天内的21.7%(单项研究),6个月时达到37.5%,12个月时达到41.3%。住院再入院率同样从30天的10.4%增加到6个月的30.4%和12个月的31.9%(单一研究)。在几个合并分析中观察到实质性的异质性。结论:在接下来的一年中,与跌倒相关的ED表现与大量累积的急性护理使用有关。跌倒可能是更广泛的脆弱性和持续的医疗保健需求的重要标志。未来的研究应确定复发性急症护理的高风险患者,并确定有针对性的随访是否能减少复发性急症就诊和再入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书