Microplastic formation during degradation: bioplastics vs conventional plastics

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Inés Oliver, Andrés Fullana, Juan Antonio Conesa
{"title":"Microplastic formation during degradation: bioplastics vs conventional plastics","authors":"Inés Oliver,&nbsp;Andrés Fullana,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Conesa","doi":"10.1007/s11356-026-38204-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biodegradable plastics are increasingly promoted as alternatives to conventional fossil-based plastics, but under non-ideal end-of-life conditions they may fragment into microplastic particles instead of fully biodegrading. In this work, the degradation of bioplastics and conventional plastics was compared under two pathways: accelerated UV ageing in saline water and mechanical abrasion with sand. PLA, PHB, LDPE, and PP were studied under UV ageing, while PLA, PHB, TPS, LDPE, and PP were evaluated under mechanical abrasion. Degradation was assessed through mass loss, surface changes, colour variation, mechanical properties, and microplastic generation. Under accelerated UV ageing, PLA and PHB showed the strongest degradation, with higher mass loss, more pronounced surface damage, larger colour changes, and greater mechanical deterioration than LDPE and PP. Under abrasion, PHB and TPS showed the highest mass loss, while LDPE and PP were more resistant. Microplastic generation increased with degradation time for all materials, although with clear differences depending on polymer type and degradation route. Overall, the results show that the biodegradable plastics evaluated in this study did not necessarily present a lower risk of microplastic release than the conventional plastics tested under the same conditions. Under the same degradation conditions and exposure time, some biodegradable polymers generated even larger amounts of particulate material, indicating higher potential for microplastic generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"33 30","pages":"15618 - 15637"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-026-38204-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodegradable plastics are increasingly promoted as alternatives to conventional fossil-based plastics, but under non-ideal end-of-life conditions they may fragment into microplastic particles instead of fully biodegrading. In this work, the degradation of bioplastics and conventional plastics was compared under two pathways: accelerated UV ageing in saline water and mechanical abrasion with sand. PLA, PHB, LDPE, and PP were studied under UV ageing, while PLA, PHB, TPS, LDPE, and PP were evaluated under mechanical abrasion. Degradation was assessed through mass loss, surface changes, colour variation, mechanical properties, and microplastic generation. Under accelerated UV ageing, PLA and PHB showed the strongest degradation, with higher mass loss, more pronounced surface damage, larger colour changes, and greater mechanical deterioration than LDPE and PP. Under abrasion, PHB and TPS showed the highest mass loss, while LDPE and PP were more resistant. Microplastic generation increased with degradation time for all materials, although with clear differences depending on polymer type and degradation route. Overall, the results show that the biodegradable plastics evaluated in this study did not necessarily present a lower risk of microplastic release than the conventional plastics tested under the same conditions. Under the same degradation conditions and exposure time, some biodegradable polymers generated even larger amounts of particulate material, indicating higher potential for microplastic generation.

降解过程中微塑料的形成:生物塑料与传统塑料。
可生物降解塑料作为传统化石基塑料的替代品越来越受到推崇,但在非理想的报废条件下,它们可能会破碎成微塑料颗粒,而不是完全生物降解。在这项工作中,生物塑料和传统塑料的降解在两种途径下进行了比较:在盐水中加速紫外线老化和用沙子机械磨损。在紫外老化条件下对PLA、PHB、LDPE和PP进行了研究,在机械磨损条件下对PLA、PHB、TPS、LDPE和PP进行了研究。通过质量损失、表面变化、颜色变化、机械性能和微塑料的产生来评估降解。在UV加速老化下,PLA和PHB的降解最强烈,质量损失更大,表面损伤更明显,颜色变化更大,机械劣化更严重。在磨损下,PHB和TPS的质量损失最大,而LDPE和PP的耐磨性更强。微塑料的产生随着降解时间的增加而增加,尽管根据聚合物类型和降解途径存在明显差异。总体而言,研究结果表明,在相同条件下,研究中评估的可生物降解塑料释放微塑料的风险并不一定低于测试的常规塑料。在相同的降解条件和暴露时间下,一些可生物降解聚合物产生的颗粒物质甚至更多,表明微塑料产生的可能性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书