Effects of Combining Eco- and Social Labels on Consumer Value—Additive, Neutral or Cannibalizing? Insights From a Conjoint Analysis

IF 5.3 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility Pub Date : 2026-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-12-14 DOI:10.1111/beer.70039
Lamia Arslan, Samanthi Dijkstra-Silva
{"title":"Effects of Combining Eco- and Social Labels on Consumer Value—Additive, Neutral or Cannibalizing? Insights From a Conjoint Analysis","authors":"Lamia Arslan,&nbsp;Samanthi Dijkstra-Silva","doi":"10.1111/beer.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite research on sustainable labels, little is known about combining eco- and social labels and the effects on consumers. Although consumers are increasingly confronted with both socially oriented, e.g., fair trade, as well as environmentally oriented eco-labels such as certified organic cotton, the effect on consumer value has not been explored. To address this gap, this paper theorizes that the effects of combining a social and an eco-label could be additive, neutral, or – in the worst case – cannibalizing. This study employs a choice-based conjoint analysis to investigate the interaction effect of social and eco-labelling for apparel. The study also examines which attributes (quality, price, social and eco-label) consumers prefer. We contribute to the literature in two ways: First, we discuss the need to differentiate between social and environmental labels and hypothesize about the potential effects of combining both. Second, we show that combining social and eco-labels has a neutral – not additive or cannibalizing – effect although consumers value the presence of a sustainability label, i.e., an eco- or social label, on apparel. While consumers appreciate the consideration of sustainability in the supply chain of the product, clarity on what elements are important and are reflected in the labels requires further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"35 4","pages":"2817-2832"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.70039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite research on sustainable labels, little is known about combining eco- and social labels and the effects on consumers. Although consumers are increasingly confronted with both socially oriented, e.g., fair trade, as well as environmentally oriented eco-labels such as certified organic cotton, the effect on consumer value has not been explored. To address this gap, this paper theorizes that the effects of combining a social and an eco-label could be additive, neutral, or – in the worst case – cannibalizing. This study employs a choice-based conjoint analysis to investigate the interaction effect of social and eco-labelling for apparel. The study also examines which attributes (quality, price, social and eco-label) consumers prefer. We contribute to the literature in two ways: First, we discuss the need to differentiate between social and environmental labels and hypothesize about the potential effects of combining both. Second, we show that combining social and eco-labels has a neutral – not additive or cannibalizing – effect although consumers value the presence of a sustainability label, i.e., an eco- or social label, on apparel. While consumers appreciate the consideration of sustainability in the supply chain of the product, clarity on what elements are important and are reflected in the labels requires further research.

生态与社会标签结合对消费者价值增值、中性或蚕食的影响?来自联合分析的见解
尽管对可持续标签进行了研究,但人们对生态和社会标签的结合以及对消费者的影响知之甚少。虽然消费者越来越多地面对社会导向,如公平贸易,以及环境导向的生态标签,如认证有机棉,对消费者价值的影响尚未探讨。为了解决这一差距,本文从理论上提出,社会标签和生态标签相结合的影响可能是附加的、中性的,或者——在最坏的情况下——相互蚕食。本研究采用基于选择的联合分析,探讨服装社会与生态标签的互动效应。该研究还调查了消费者更喜欢哪些属性(质量、价格、社会和生态标签)。我们以两种方式为文献做出贡献:首先,我们讨论了区分社会和环境标签的必要性,并对两者结合的潜在影响进行了假设。其次,我们表明,结合社会和生态标签具有中性-而不是附加或蚕食-效果,尽管消费者重视可持续性标签的存在,即生态或社会标签,在服装上。虽然消费者欣赏产品供应链中可持续性的考虑,但明确哪些元素是重要的,并反映在标签上,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书