Rethinking the “Ideal” Auditor: The Underestimated Role of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Recruitment and Retention at Accounting Firms Repenser l'auditeur « idéal » : le rôle sous-estimé de l'équité, de la diversité et de l'inclusion dans le recrutement et la rétention en cabinet comptable

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Accounting Perspectives Pub Date : 2026-09-15 Epub Date: 2026-08-10 DOI:10.1111/1911-3838.70037
Oriane Couchoux, Laurence Daoust
{"title":"Rethinking the “Ideal” Auditor: The Underestimated Role of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Recruitment and Retention at Accounting Firms\n Repenser l'auditeur « idéal » : le rôle sous-estimé de l'équité, de la diversité et de l'inclusion dans le recrutement et la rétention en cabinet comptable","authors":"Oriane Couchoux,&nbsp;Laurence Daoust","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Both in Canada and internationally, accounting firms are struggling to recruit and retain staff. One underexplored factor that may help to explain and resolve these challenges concerns the integration of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) considerations into firms' organizational processes. The accounting profession, in general, and accounting firms, in particular, have made significant progress in EDI aims, supported by the implementation of numerous initiatives and substantial investments. However, organizational processes designed to recruit, onboard, and promote those professionals deemed to be the highest performers—that is, the “ideal” auditors—still too often lead to the loss of qualified talent. Drawing on the academic literature, we show that certain practices, though not necessarily designed with discriminatory intent, remain non-inclusive and thus hinder the access, advancement, and retention of several underrepresented groups within the profession. We further analyze the mechanisms and biases that contribute to these dynamics and propose various avenues for reducing bias in organizational processes and promoting greater EDI within accounting firms.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"25 3","pages":"531-547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3838.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both in Canada and internationally, accounting firms are struggling to recruit and retain staff. One underexplored factor that may help to explain and resolve these challenges concerns the integration of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) considerations into firms' organizational processes. The accounting profession, in general, and accounting firms, in particular, have made significant progress in EDI aims, supported by the implementation of numerous initiatives and substantial investments. However, organizational processes designed to recruit, onboard, and promote those professionals deemed to be the highest performers—that is, the “ideal” auditors—still too often lead to the loss of qualified talent. Drawing on the academic literature, we show that certain practices, though not necessarily designed with discriminatory intent, remain non-inclusive and thus hinder the access, advancement, and retention of several underrepresented groups within the profession. We further analyze the mechanisms and biases that contribute to these dynamics and propose various avenues for reducing bias in organizational processes and promoting greater EDI within accounting firms.

重新思考“理想”审计师:在会计师事务所招聘和保留中被低估的公平、多样性和包容性的作用
无论是在加拿大还是在国际上,会计师事务所都在努力招聘和留住员工。一个未被充分探讨的因素可能有助于解释和解决这些挑战,涉及将公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)考虑纳入公司的组织过程。一般来说,会计行业,特别是会计公司,在实施了许多倡议和大量投资的支持下,在EDI目标方面取得了重大进展。然而,旨在招募、加入和提升那些被认为是表现最好的专业人士(即“理想的”审计师)的组织流程,仍然经常导致合格人才的流失。根据学术文献,我们表明,某些做法虽然不一定带有歧视意图,但仍然不具有包容性,从而阻碍了专业中几个代表性不足的群体的进入、发展和保留。我们进一步分析了促成这些动态的机制和偏见,并提出了减少组织过程中的偏见和促进会计师事务所内部更大程度的EDI的各种途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Perspectives
Accounting Perspectives BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Accounting Perspectives provides a forum for peer-reviewed applied research, analysis, synthesis and commentary on issues of interest to academics, practitioners, financial analysts, financial executives, regulators, accounting policy makers and accounting students. Articles are sought from academics and practitioners that address relevant issues in any and all areas of accounting and related fields, including financial accounting and reporting, auditing and other assurance services, management accounting and performance measurement, information systems and related technologies, tax policy and practice, professional ethics, accounting education, and related topics. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书