Aspects of seismic response margins and overstrength of massive low-rise RC shear walls

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Adrián Bekő, Helmut Wenzel, Barbora Bánská
{"title":"Aspects of seismic response margins and overstrength of massive low-rise RC shear walls","authors":"Adrián Bekő,&nbsp;Helmut Wenzel,&nbsp;Barbora Bánská","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02500-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nonlinear seismic behavior of massive low-rise shear walls under various earthquake motions is studied to contrast design assumptions with actual structural behavior. Various perspectives are herein adopted to understand the evolution of structural changes and their connection to possible margins. We specifically focus on behavior up to the reinforcement yield. A dedicated analytical model is used to calculate the structural response. The change in the apparent vibration frequency due to stiffness degradation is assessed using a time-frequency analysis, separately for the wall responding to the yield limit and to the ultimate limit. A considerable decrease in the apparent vibration frequency is noted also in the first case. When approaching the problem through load categorization, we see that such a categorization changes as the structure utilizes its ductile capacity. Next, assuming an elastoplastic idealization, we compare the code-based response spectrum with response spectra derived for scaled acceleration records, which would provoke a structural response to the yield limit. For such excitation, spectral ordinates higher than code-based values have been found. Seismic overstrength, defined in terms of yield reduction factors, has been calculated for various natural periods of the system. The strengthened yield reduction factors have been found to be 0.85–2.43 for the wall when responding to its yield limit and 1.16–5.11 when responding to its ultimate limit. Utilization of the overstrength over the idealized yield strength strongly depends on the character of the excitation and the natural period of the structure and can mean slight or considerable margins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 9","pages":"7545 - 7572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-026-02500-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02500-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nonlinear seismic behavior of massive low-rise shear walls under various earthquake motions is studied to contrast design assumptions with actual structural behavior. Various perspectives are herein adopted to understand the evolution of structural changes and their connection to possible margins. We specifically focus on behavior up to the reinforcement yield. A dedicated analytical model is used to calculate the structural response. The change in the apparent vibration frequency due to stiffness degradation is assessed using a time-frequency analysis, separately for the wall responding to the yield limit and to the ultimate limit. A considerable decrease in the apparent vibration frequency is noted also in the first case. When approaching the problem through load categorization, we see that such a categorization changes as the structure utilizes its ductile capacity. Next, assuming an elastoplastic idealization, we compare the code-based response spectrum with response spectra derived for scaled acceleration records, which would provoke a structural response to the yield limit. For such excitation, spectral ordinates higher than code-based values have been found. Seismic overstrength, defined in terms of yield reduction factors, has been calculated for various natural periods of the system. The strengthened yield reduction factors have been found to be 0.85–2.43 for the wall when responding to its yield limit and 1.16–5.11 when responding to its ultimate limit. Utilization of the overstrength over the idealized yield strength strongly depends on the character of the excitation and the natural period of the structure and can mean slight or considerable margins.

大块低矮剪力墙地震反应裕度及超强研究
本文研究了各种地震运动下大体积低矮剪力墙的非线性抗震性能,并将设计假设与实际结构性能进行了对比。本文采用不同的观点来理解结构变化的演变及其与可能的边际的联系。我们特别关注强化屈服前的行为。采用专门的解析模型计算结构响应。由于刚度退化导致的表观振动频率的变化使用时频分析进行评估,分别用于响应屈服极限和最终极限的墙壁。在第一种情况下,表观振动频率也有相当大的降低。当通过荷载分类处理问题时,我们看到这种分类随着结构利用其延性能力而变化。接下来,假设弹塑性理想化,我们将基于代码的响应谱与缩放加速度记录的响应谱进行比较,这将引发对屈服极限的结构响应。对于这种激发,谱坐标已发现高于基于代码的值。用屈服折减系数来定义的地震超强度,已经计算了系统的各个自然周期。结果表明,墙体响应屈服极限时的强化屈服折减系数为0.85 ~ 2.43,响应极限时的强化屈服折减系数为1.16 ~ 5.11。超过理想屈服强度的利用在很大程度上取决于激励的特性和结构的自然周期,并且可能意味着轻微或相当大的余量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书