Poster: 34Bile acids as potential immunomodulatory signals

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2026.07.066
S. Durfey, J. Maaskant, J. Moran, I. Miralda, M. Shrestha, H. Ozuna, X. Ji, P. Dawson, J. Chandler, R. Tirouvanziam, B. Kopp
{"title":"Poster: 34Bile acids as potential immunomodulatory signals","authors":"S. Durfey,&nbsp;J. Maaskant,&nbsp;J. Moran,&nbsp;I. Miralda,&nbsp;M. Shrestha,&nbsp;H. Ozuna,&nbsp;X. Ji,&nbsp;P. Dawson,&nbsp;J. Chandler,&nbsp;R. Tirouvanziam,&nbsp;B. Kopp","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2026.07.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Plasma and sputum from people with CF (pwCF) suppress macrophage functions and it is unknown what induces this suppression. This suppression could be mediated by bile acids (BA), as BA are dysregulated in CF in metabolomic studies of clinical samples and mechanistic studies showing direct CFTR effects on BA regulation. Importantly, some BA species and their derivatives can regulate gut and liver immune cell function by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytosis. However, it remains unclear whether systemic and airway macrophages respond to BAs, and whether BA dysregulation persists with CFTR modulator therapy.</div></div><div>Plasma and sputum from people with CF (pwCF) suppress macrophage functions and it is unknown what induces this suppression. This suppression could be mediated by bile acids (BA), as BA are dysregulated in CF in metabolomic studies of clinical samples and mechanistic studies showing direct CFTR effects on BA regulation. Importantly, some BA species and their derivatives can regulate gut and liver immune cell function by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytosis. However, it remains unclear whether systemic and airway macrophages respond to BAs, and whether BA dysregulation persists with CFTR modulator therapy.</div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Plasma samples from pwCF pre- and post-elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) were assessed for BAs and related metabolites. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from the Chan-Zuckerberg CellxGene database were mined to determine if BA receptors are expressed in lung-resident macrophages. Human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from healthy and CF donors were differentiated with 20% human serum, exposed to BA for 24hrs, and BA effects on phagocytosis and intracellular killing were assessed.</div></div><div>Plasma samples from pwCF pre- and post-elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) were assessed for BAs and related metabolites. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from the Chan-Zuckerberg CellxGene database were mined to determine if BA receptors are expressed in lung-resident macrophages. Human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from healthy and CF donors were differentiated with 20% human serum, exposed to BA for 24hrs, and BA effects on phagocytosis and intracellular killing were assessed.</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Untargeted metabolomics revealed two BAs in the top 10 most elevated metabolites in CF plasma (vs healthy), and this difference persisted following ETI. We further investigated BA levels using a quantitative panel of 64 BA species. Hyocholic, cholic, and chenodeoxycholic acids were all significantly elevated in plasma from pwCF pre-ETI. This difference persisted with ETI, with a further increase in hyocholic acid. As BA alterations can influence other signaling molecules, such as the production of fatty acids like oxylipins, we also quantified both esterified and non-esterified versions of 50 different oxylipins. Non-esterified oxylipins were not different between CF and healthy plasma, but three esterified oxylipins were significantly elevated in CF plasma. Two in the 5-LOX pathway remained elevated post-ETI, while one related to linoleic acid normalized. Additional human samples (plasma and airway) pre- and post-vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor are under analysis for untargeted metabolomics, targeted BA and oxylipin quantification, RNA expression, and cytokines.</div><div>At the mechanistic level, we explored whether BAs influence macrophage effector functions. We found lung and liver macrophages express membrane and nuclear BA receptors at similar levels. BA treatment did not alter MDM phagocytosis or intracellular killing of <em>P. aeruginosa</em> and <em>S. aureus</em>. Given macrophage plasticity, we then tested if BA receptor expression or BA responses changed with macrophage polarization. M1-polarized (IFNγ &amp; LPS) macrophages upregulated TGR5 RNA, the main membrane BA receptor, but not its surface protein expression. However, BA-treated M2-polarized (dexamethasone) macrophages had a blunted transcriptional response to LPS stimulation. This may suggest a TGR5-independent response. We are currently exploring if BA exposure during differentiation or polarization alters macrophage BA receptor expression and responses.</div></div><div>Untargeted metabolomics revealed two BAs in the top 10 most elevated metabolites in CF plasma (vs healthy), and this difference persisted following ETI. We further investigated BA levels using a quantitative panel of 64 BA species. Hyocholic, cholic, and chenodeoxycholic acids were all significantly elevated in plasma from pwCF pre-ETI. This difference persisted with ETI, with a further increase in hyocholic acid. As BA alterations can influence other signaling molecules, such as the production of fatty acids like oxylipins, we also quantified both esterified and non-esterified versions of 50 different oxylipins. Non-esterified oxylipins were not different between CF and healthy plasma, but three esterified oxylipins were significantly elevated in CF plasma. Two in the 5-LOX pathway remained elevated post-ETI, while one related to linoleic acid normalized. Additional human samples (plasma and airway) pre- and post-vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor are under analysis for untargeted metabolomics, targeted BA and oxylipin quantification, RNA expression, and cytokines.</div><div>At the mechanistic level, we explored whether BAs influence macrophage effector functions. We found lung and liver macrophages express membrane and nuclear BA receptors at similar levels. BA treatment did not alter MDM phagocytosis or intracellular killing of <em>P. aeruginosa</em> and <em>S. aureus</em>. Given macrophage plasticity, we then tested if BA receptor expression or BA responses changed with macrophage polarization. M1-polarized (IFNγ &amp; LPS) macrophages upregulated TGR5 RNA, the main membrane BA receptor, but not its surface protein expression. However, BA-treated M2-polarized (dexamethasone) macrophages had a blunted transcriptional response to LPS stimulation. This may suggest a TGR5-independent response. We are currently exploring if BA exposure during differentiation or polarization alters macrophage BA receptor expression and responses.</div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>scRNA-seq data and in vitro experiments confirmed that lung macrophages express BA receptors at physiologically relevant levels, while metabolomics studies revealed persistent BA alterations in CF. Ongoing studies using alternative differentiation conditions, repeated BA exposure, and human samples will clarify whether BAs contribute to macrophage-mediated bacterial tolerance in CF.</div></div><div>scRNA-seq data and in vitro experiments confirmed that lung macrophages express BA receptors at physiologically relevant levels, while metabolomics studies revealed persistent BA alterations in CF. Ongoing studies using alternative differentiation conditions, repeated BA exposure, and human samples will clarify whether BAs contribute to macrophage-mediated bacterial tolerance in CF.</div>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":"25 ","pages":"Page 17"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569199326017418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Plasma and sputum from people with CF (pwCF) suppress macrophage functions and it is unknown what induces this suppression. This suppression could be mediated by bile acids (BA), as BA are dysregulated in CF in metabolomic studies of clinical samples and mechanistic studies showing direct CFTR effects on BA regulation. Importantly, some BA species and their derivatives can regulate gut and liver immune cell function by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytosis. However, it remains unclear whether systemic and airway macrophages respond to BAs, and whether BA dysregulation persists with CFTR modulator therapy.
Plasma and sputum from people with CF (pwCF) suppress macrophage functions and it is unknown what induces this suppression. This suppression could be mediated by bile acids (BA), as BA are dysregulated in CF in metabolomic studies of clinical samples and mechanistic studies showing direct CFTR effects on BA regulation. Importantly, some BA species and their derivatives can regulate gut and liver immune cell function by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production and phagocytosis. However, it remains unclear whether systemic and airway macrophages respond to BAs, and whether BA dysregulation persists with CFTR modulator therapy.

Methods

Plasma samples from pwCF pre- and post-elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) were assessed for BAs and related metabolites. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from the Chan-Zuckerberg CellxGene database were mined to determine if BA receptors are expressed in lung-resident macrophages. Human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from healthy and CF donors were differentiated with 20% human serum, exposed to BA for 24hrs, and BA effects on phagocytosis and intracellular killing were assessed.
Plasma samples from pwCF pre- and post-elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) were assessed for BAs and related metabolites. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from the Chan-Zuckerberg CellxGene database were mined to determine if BA receptors are expressed in lung-resident macrophages. Human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from healthy and CF donors were differentiated with 20% human serum, exposed to BA for 24hrs, and BA effects on phagocytosis and intracellular killing were assessed.

Results

Untargeted metabolomics revealed two BAs in the top 10 most elevated metabolites in CF plasma (vs healthy), and this difference persisted following ETI. We further investigated BA levels using a quantitative panel of 64 BA species. Hyocholic, cholic, and chenodeoxycholic acids were all significantly elevated in plasma from pwCF pre-ETI. This difference persisted with ETI, with a further increase in hyocholic acid. As BA alterations can influence other signaling molecules, such as the production of fatty acids like oxylipins, we also quantified both esterified and non-esterified versions of 50 different oxylipins. Non-esterified oxylipins were not different between CF and healthy plasma, but three esterified oxylipins were significantly elevated in CF plasma. Two in the 5-LOX pathway remained elevated post-ETI, while one related to linoleic acid normalized. Additional human samples (plasma and airway) pre- and post-vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor are under analysis for untargeted metabolomics, targeted BA and oxylipin quantification, RNA expression, and cytokines.
At the mechanistic level, we explored whether BAs influence macrophage effector functions. We found lung and liver macrophages express membrane and nuclear BA receptors at similar levels. BA treatment did not alter MDM phagocytosis or intracellular killing of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Given macrophage plasticity, we then tested if BA receptor expression or BA responses changed with macrophage polarization. M1-polarized (IFNγ & LPS) macrophages upregulated TGR5 RNA, the main membrane BA receptor, but not its surface protein expression. However, BA-treated M2-polarized (dexamethasone) macrophages had a blunted transcriptional response to LPS stimulation. This may suggest a TGR5-independent response. We are currently exploring if BA exposure during differentiation or polarization alters macrophage BA receptor expression and responses.
Untargeted metabolomics revealed two BAs in the top 10 most elevated metabolites in CF plasma (vs healthy), and this difference persisted following ETI. We further investigated BA levels using a quantitative panel of 64 BA species. Hyocholic, cholic, and chenodeoxycholic acids were all significantly elevated in plasma from pwCF pre-ETI. This difference persisted with ETI, with a further increase in hyocholic acid. As BA alterations can influence other signaling molecules, such as the production of fatty acids like oxylipins, we also quantified both esterified and non-esterified versions of 50 different oxylipins. Non-esterified oxylipins were not different between CF and healthy plasma, but three esterified oxylipins were significantly elevated in CF plasma. Two in the 5-LOX pathway remained elevated post-ETI, while one related to linoleic acid normalized. Additional human samples (plasma and airway) pre- and post-vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor are under analysis for untargeted metabolomics, targeted BA and oxylipin quantification, RNA expression, and cytokines.
At the mechanistic level, we explored whether BAs influence macrophage effector functions. We found lung and liver macrophages express membrane and nuclear BA receptors at similar levels. BA treatment did not alter MDM phagocytosis or intracellular killing of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Given macrophage plasticity, we then tested if BA receptor expression or BA responses changed with macrophage polarization. M1-polarized (IFNγ & LPS) macrophages upregulated TGR5 RNA, the main membrane BA receptor, but not its surface protein expression. However, BA-treated M2-polarized (dexamethasone) macrophages had a blunted transcriptional response to LPS stimulation. This may suggest a TGR5-independent response. We are currently exploring if BA exposure during differentiation or polarization alters macrophage BA receptor expression and responses.

Conclusions

scRNA-seq data and in vitro experiments confirmed that lung macrophages express BA receptors at physiologically relevant levels, while metabolomics studies revealed persistent BA alterations in CF. Ongoing studies using alternative differentiation conditions, repeated BA exposure, and human samples will clarify whether BAs contribute to macrophage-mediated bacterial tolerance in CF.
scRNA-seq data and in vitro experiments confirmed that lung macrophages express BA receptors at physiologically relevant levels, while metabolomics studies revealed persistent BA alterations in CF. Ongoing studies using alternative differentiation conditions, repeated BA exposure, and human samples will clarify whether BAs contribute to macrophage-mediated bacterial tolerance in CF.
海报:34胆汁酸作为潜在的免疫调节信号
CF患者的血浆和痰液可抑制巨噬细胞功能,目前尚不清楚是什么诱导了这种抑制。这种抑制可能是由胆汁酸(BA)介导的,因为在临床样本的代谢组学研究和机制研究中,胆汁酸在CF中失调,表明CFTR直接影响BA调节。重要的是,一些BA物种及其衍生物可以通过减少促炎细胞因子的产生和吞噬来调节肠道和肝脏免疫细胞功能。然而,目前尚不清楚系统性和气道巨噬细胞是否对BAs有反应,以及CFTR调节剂治疗是否会持续BA失调。CF患者的血浆和痰液可抑制巨噬细胞功能,目前尚不清楚是什么诱导了这种抑制。这种抑制可能是由胆汁酸(BA)介导的,因为在临床样本的代谢组学研究和机制研究中,胆汁酸在CF中失调,表明CFTR直接影响BA调节。重要的是,一些BA物种及其衍生物可以通过减少促炎细胞因子的产生和吞噬来调节肠道和肝脏免疫细胞功能。然而,目前尚不清楚系统性和气道巨噬细胞是否对BAs有反应,以及CFTR调节剂治疗是否会持续BA失调。方法对pwCF提取前后血浆(ETI)进行BAs及相关代谢物检测。来自Chan-Zuckerberg CellxGene数据库的单细胞RNA测序数据被挖掘,以确定BA受体是否在肺内巨噬细胞中表达。将健康和CF供者的人单核细胞来源的巨噬细胞(MDMs)与20%的人血清分化,暴露于BA中24小时,并评估BA对吞噬和细胞内杀伤的影响。对pwCF提取前后的血浆样本(ETI)进行BAs和相关代谢物的评估。来自Chan-Zuckerberg CellxGene数据库的单细胞RNA测序数据被挖掘,以确定BA受体是否在肺内巨噬细胞中表达。将健康和CF供者的人单核细胞来源的巨噬细胞(MDMs)与20%的人血清分化,暴露于BA中24小时,并评估BA对吞噬和细胞内杀伤的影响。结果靶代谢组学分析显示,CF血浆(与健康人群相比)前10名代谢产物中有2种BAs升高,且这种差异在ETI后持续存在。我们使用64种BA的定量面板进一步研究BA水平。血浆中胆酸、胆酸和鹅去氧胆酸均显著升高。这种差异在ETI中持续存在,随着胆酸的进一步增加。由于BA的改变可以影响其他信号分子,如脂肪酸如氧化脂质的产生,我们还量化了50种不同氧化脂质的酯化和非酯化版本。非酯化氧脂在CF与健康血浆中无显著差异,但3种酯化氧脂在CF血浆中显著升高。在eti后,5-LOX通路中的两个保持升高,而一个与亚油酸正常化有关。在使用vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor前和后的其他人类样本(血浆和气道)正在进行非靶向代谢组学分析,靶向BA和氧脂质定量,RNA表达和细胞因子。在机制水平上,我们探讨了BAs是否影响巨噬细胞效应功能。我们发现肺和肝巨噬细胞表达膜和核BA受体的水平相似。BA处理没有改变MDM吞噬作用或铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的细胞内杀伤。考虑到巨噬细胞的可塑性,我们随后测试了BA受体表达或BA反应是否随着巨噬细胞极化而改变。m1极化(IFNγ &amp; LPS)巨噬细胞上调主要膜BA受体TGR5 RNA,但不上调其表面蛋白表达。然而,ba处理的m2极化(地塞米松)巨噬细胞对LPS刺激的转录反应减弱。这可能提示与tgr5无关的反应。我们目前正在探索分化或极化过程中BA暴露是否会改变巨噬细胞BA受体的表达和反应。非靶向代谢组学显示,CF血浆中10种最高代谢产物中有两种BAs(与健康人群相比),这种差异在ETI后持续存在。我们使用64种BA的定量面板进一步研究BA水平。血浆中胆酸、胆酸和鹅去氧胆酸均显著升高。这种差异在ETI中持续存在,随着胆酸的进一步增加。由于BA的改变可以影响其他信号分子,如脂肪酸如氧化脂质的产生,我们还量化了50种不同氧化脂质的酯化和非酯化版本。非酯化氧脂在CF与健康血浆中无显著差异,但3种酯化氧脂在CF血浆中显著升高。 在eti后,5-LOX通路中的两个保持升高,而一个与亚油酸正常化有关。在使用vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor前和后的其他人类样本(血浆和气道)正在进行非靶向代谢组学分析,靶向BA和氧脂质定量,RNA表达和细胞因子。在机制水平上,我们探讨了BAs是否影响巨噬细胞效应功能。我们发现肺和肝巨噬细胞表达膜和核BA受体的水平相似。BA处理没有改变MDM吞噬作用或铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的细胞内杀伤。考虑到巨噬细胞的可塑性,我们随后测试了BA受体表达或BA反应是否随着巨噬细胞极化而改变。m1极化(IFNγ &amp; LPS)巨噬细胞上调主要膜BA受体TGR5 RNA,但不上调其表面蛋白表达。然而,ba处理的m2极化(地塞米松)巨噬细胞对LPS刺激的转录反应减弱。这可能提示与tgr5无关的反应。我们目前正在探索分化或极化过程中BA暴露是否会改变巨噬细胞BA受体的表达和反应。结论scrna -seq数据和体外实验证实,肺巨噬细胞以生理相关水平表达BA受体,而代谢组学研究显示,CF中BA持续改变。scrna -seq数据和体外实验证实,肺巨噬细胞以生理相关水平表达BA受体,而代谢组学研究显示,CF中BA持续改变。正在进行的研究使用替代分化条件、重复BA暴露和人类样本,将阐明BAs是否有助于CF中巨噬细胞介导的细菌耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书