Post-disturbance soil monitoring in forests using remote sensing: an evidence map

IF 5.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Pub Date : 2026-09-15 DOI:10.5194/soil-12-885-2026
Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, Jérôme Laganière
{"title":"Post-disturbance soil monitoring in forests using remote sensing: an evidence map","authors":"Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, Jérôme Laganière","doi":"10.5194/soil-12-885-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post-disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground-signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and inform emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post-disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post-fire severity and erosion-related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo-photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface-expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance-aware soil-monitoring frameworks. It also clarifies which soil indicators are most consistently observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps identify realistic RS-supported objectives that may inform future reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-885-2026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post-disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground-signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and inform emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post-disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post-fire severity and erosion-related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo-photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface-expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance-aware soil-monitoring frameworks. It also clarifies which soil indicators are most consistently observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps identify realistic RS-supported objectives that may inform future reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.
森林扰动后土壤遥感监测:证据图
摘要。森林土壤是生态系统恢复力和生产力的基础,但日益受到自然和人为干扰的威胁。在森林中,在业务尺度上监测扰动后土壤退化仍然具有挑战性,地面信号的障碍和对代理指标的依赖限制了遥感(RS)的应用。为了确定RS在哪些方面有利于土壤监测并为新出现的报告需求提供信息,我们开发了一个结构化的证据图,用于使用RS方法评估干扰后森林土壤退化的研究。从4338条记录中,综合了干扰类型、生物群系、平台、尺度和指标等72项初步研究。证据基础主要是野火和采伐,反映了产生可观察到的地表影响的干扰途径。多光谱卫星数据仍然是绘制火灾后严重程度和侵蚀相关指标的主要工具,而激光雷达和立体摄影测量最常用于量化收获作业后的地表变形。由于可观测性的限制,与地下物理、化学或生物变化相关的指标仍然是稀疏的。总的来说,RS在绘制干扰足迹、检测地表表达指标和为有针对性的现场评估分层景观方面最有效,而不是直接测量土壤性质。这张证据图阐明了RS的好处和局限性,确定了持续存在的差距,并强调了开发干扰感知土壤监测框架的优先事项。它还澄清了哪些土壤指标可以用RS最一致地观察到,哪些需要补充方法。通过将干扰过程与可观察指标联系起来,这种综合有助于确定现实的rs支持的目标,这些目标可能为国家森林监测和评估计划的未来报告框架提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书