Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, Jérôme Laganière
{"title":"Post-disturbance soil monitoring in forests using remote sensing: an evidence map","authors":"Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, Jérôme Laganière","doi":"10.5194/soil-12-885-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post-disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground-signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and inform emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post-disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post-fire severity and erosion-related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo-photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface-expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance-aware soil-monitoring frameworks. It also clarifies which soil indicators are most consistently observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps identify realistic RS-supported objectives that may inform future reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-885-2026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post-disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground-signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and inform emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post-disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post-fire severity and erosion-related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo-photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface-expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance-aware soil-monitoring frameworks. It also clarifies which soil indicators are most consistently observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps identify realistic RS-supported objectives that may inform future reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.
SoilAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍:
SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences.
SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).