Quality Standards, Competency Models, and Curricula of Nursing Education and Training in Addiction Nursing: A Scoping Review.

Vendula Pokorná, Anna Volfová, Amalie Lososová, Charon Burda, Dana Murphy-Parker, Carmel Clancy, Michal Miovský
{"title":"Quality Standards, Competency Models, and Curricula of Nursing Education and Training in Addiction Nursing: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Vendula Pokorná, Anna Volfová, Amalie Lososová, Charon Burda, Dana Murphy-Parker, Carmel Clancy, Michal Miovský","doi":"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nursing profession is crucial to both the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders. Higher education in nursing in the field of addiction varies among countries, and the quality of these programs also differs. It is of vital importance to observe how professional capacity and quality care in addiction nursing (AN) are being secured. The objective of this scoping review was to explore educational interventions (EI) within AN, at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, with a focus on describing the curricula, key competencies, quality standards, and the competency models that underpin these programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of articles was conducted, focusing on nursing education and training programs in addictions. The aim was to detect sources that are consistent with the criteria and methodology based on the PRISMA-ScR protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews). Applicable papers were identified using the electronic databases Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, and SCOPUS. Subsequently, titles and abstracts were reviewed independently for relevance. Full texts of relevant papers (N = 39) were examined and analyzed for curricula, quality standards, and competency models of nursing education and training in addictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This scoping review examines and analyzes EI in AN, with a focus on curricula, key competencies, quality standards, and the competency models that they are based on. Curricula, competencies, and quality standards descriptions were limited. Competencies were generally discussed in relation to training modules and course objectives rather than being explicitly defined. Within the curricula, methods and time allocation were outlined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The articles on EI in AN did not offer an in-depth description of curricula, competencies, and quality standards. A greater focus on these aspects of EI in AN is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":524201,"journal":{"name":"International journal of addiction nursing","volume":"37 3","pages":"E60-E101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of addiction nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The nursing profession is crucial to both the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders. Higher education in nursing in the field of addiction varies among countries, and the quality of these programs also differs. It is of vital importance to observe how professional capacity and quality care in addiction nursing (AN) are being secured. The objective of this scoping review was to explore educational interventions (EI) within AN, at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, with a focus on describing the curricula, key competencies, quality standards, and the competency models that underpin these programs.

Methods: A scoping review of articles was conducted, focusing on nursing education and training programs in addictions. The aim was to detect sources that are consistent with the criteria and methodology based on the PRISMA-ScR protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews). Applicable papers were identified using the electronic databases Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, and SCOPUS. Subsequently, titles and abstracts were reviewed independently for relevance. Full texts of relevant papers (N = 39) were examined and analyzed for curricula, quality standards, and competency models of nursing education and training in addictions.

Results: This scoping review examines and analyzes EI in AN, with a focus on curricula, key competencies, quality standards, and the competency models that they are based on. Curricula, competencies, and quality standards descriptions were limited. Competencies were generally discussed in relation to training modules and course objectives rather than being explicitly defined. Within the curricula, methods and time allocation were outlined.

Conclusions: The articles on EI in AN did not offer an in-depth description of curricula, competencies, and quality standards. A greater focus on these aspects of EI in AN is required.

成瘾护理的质量标准、能力模型和护理教育与培训课程:范围综述。
背景:护理专业是预防和治疗物质使用障碍的关键。在成瘾领域的护理高等教育因国家而异,这些项目的质量也不同。观察如何确保成瘾护理(AN)的专业能力和质量护理是至关重要的。本次范围审查的目的是探索AN在本科和研究生阶段的教育干预(EI),重点是描述课程、关键能力、质量标准和支撑这些项目的能力模型。方法:对相关文献进行范围综述,重点关注成瘾护理教育和培训方案。目的是检测符合PRISMA-ScR协议(系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展)标准和方法的来源。使用电子数据库Web of Science、PubMed、EBSCO和SCOPUS来确定适用的论文。随后,对标题和摘要进行独立的相关性审查。对相关文献全文(N = 39)进行分析,探讨成瘾护理教育与培训的课程设置、质量标准和胜任力模型。结果:这个范围审查检查和分析了AN中的EI,重点是课程、关键能力、质量标准和它们所基于的能力模型。课程、能力和质量标准的描述是有限的。能力一般是根据培训模块和课程目标进行讨论,而不是明确定义。在课程中,概述了方法和时间分配。结论:AN上关于EI的文章没有提供对课程、能力和质量标准的深入描述。需要更多地关注AN中EI的这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书