The Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm in Clinical Vestibular Testing: An Interpretation-Focused Narrative Review.

IF 1.2
Leonardo Manzari
{"title":"The Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm in Clinical Vestibular Testing: An Interpretation-Focused Narrative Review.","authors":"Leonardo Manzari","doi":"10.65717/iao.2026.262416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Suppression head impulse test (SHIMP) is a video head impulse test paradigm in which the visual target is head-fixed. Because the head impulse stimulus is identical to the conventional head impulse paradigm (HIMP; earth-fixed target), the 2 paradigms provide complementary information: HIMP primarily reveals vestibular hypofunction through compensatory catch-up saccades, whereas SHIMP elicits post-impulse anti-compensatory \"recapture\" saccades in healthy individuals and can therefore highlight residual vestibular drive and the integrity of the vestibulo-saccadic interaction. Since its first clinical description, SHIMP has been applied across unilateral and bilateral vestibular disorders and, more recently, in selected central nervous system conditions. However, interpretation remains variable between laboratories and devices and can be confounded by predictable stimulation, early saccades, covert substitution strategies, and phase-dependent changes after acute vestibular loss. This narrative review focuses on an interpretation framework that explicitly separates (i) vestibular drive (slow-phase vestibulo-ocular reflex and gain) from (ii) the saccadic strategy required to re-foveate the task-defined target. The review synthesizes the physiological rationale for the reversed saccadic signature of SHIMP versus HIMP, proposes a terminology set, and provides practical interpretation rules with key sub-cases (acute versus follow-up unilateral vestibular loss; bilateral vestibulopathy with \"inappropriate\" covert saccades; SHIMP-negative patterns with functional gain in central disorders). Emphasis is placed on trace-level waveform inspection and longitudinal, context-aware reading of gain and saccade metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"22 4","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.65717/iao.2026.262416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Suppression head impulse test (SHIMP) is a video head impulse test paradigm in which the visual target is head-fixed. Because the head impulse stimulus is identical to the conventional head impulse paradigm (HIMP; earth-fixed target), the 2 paradigms provide complementary information: HIMP primarily reveals vestibular hypofunction through compensatory catch-up saccades, whereas SHIMP elicits post-impulse anti-compensatory "recapture" saccades in healthy individuals and can therefore highlight residual vestibular drive and the integrity of the vestibulo-saccadic interaction. Since its first clinical description, SHIMP has been applied across unilateral and bilateral vestibular disorders and, more recently, in selected central nervous system conditions. However, interpretation remains variable between laboratories and devices and can be confounded by predictable stimulation, early saccades, covert substitution strategies, and phase-dependent changes after acute vestibular loss. This narrative review focuses on an interpretation framework that explicitly separates (i) vestibular drive (slow-phase vestibulo-ocular reflex and gain) from (ii) the saccadic strategy required to re-foveate the task-defined target. The review synthesizes the physiological rationale for the reversed saccadic signature of SHIMP versus HIMP, proposes a terminology set, and provides practical interpretation rules with key sub-cases (acute versus follow-up unilateral vestibular loss; bilateral vestibulopathy with "inappropriate" covert saccades; SHIMP-negative patterns with functional gain in central disorders). Emphasis is placed on trace-level waveform inspection and longitudinal, context-aware reading of gain and saccade metrics.

临床前庭测试中的抑制头部冲动范式:一项以解释为中心的叙述回顾。
未标记:抑制头部脉冲测试(SHIMP)是一种视频头部脉冲测试范例,其中视觉目标是头部固定的。由于头部冲动刺激与传统的头部冲动范式(HIMP;地球固定目标)相同,这两种范式提供了互补的信息:HIMP主要通过代偿性追赶性眼跳揭示前庭功能低下,而SHIMP在健康个体中引发冲动后抗代偿性“再捕获”眼跳,因此可以突出残留的前庭驱动和前庭-眼跳相互作用的完整性。自首次临床描述以来,SHIMP已应用于单侧和双侧前庭疾病,最近也应用于选定的中枢神经系统疾病。然而,实验室和设备之间的解释仍然存在差异,并且可能被可预测的刺激、早期眼跳、隐蔽替代策略和急性前庭功能丧失后的阶段依赖性变化所混淆。这篇叙述性综述的重点是明确区分(i)前庭驱动(慢相前庭-眼反射和增益)和(ii)重新聚焦任务定义目标所需的跳眼策略的解释框架。这篇综述综合了SHIMP与HIMP的反向跳眼特征的生理原理,提出了一套术语集,并提供了关键子病例(急性与随访的单侧前庭功能丧失;双侧前庭病变伴有“不适当”隐蔽跳眼;中枢疾病伴有功能增加的SHIMP阴性模式)的实用解释规则。重点放在迹线级波形检查和纵向,上下文感知读取增益和跳频指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书