Association of cerebral microdialysis monitoring with clinical outcomes after traumatic brain injury; A systematic review.

IF 2.7 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2026-09-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2026.106659
Cansu Rehber, Sara Turella, Wilco C Peul, Raimund Helbok, Thomas A van Essen, Jeroen T J M van Dijck
{"title":"Association of cerebral microdialysis monitoring with clinical outcomes after traumatic brain injury; A systematic review.","authors":"Cansu Rehber, Sara Turella, Wilco C Peul, Raimund Helbok, Thomas A van Essen, Jeroen T J M van Dijck","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2026.106659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cerebral microdialysis (CMD) enables bedside monitoring of cerebral metabolism after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review evaluates associations between CMD-derived analytes and mortality and functional outcome in adults with moderate-to-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) undergoing CMD monitoring of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR), glutamate, and/or glycerol. Prespecified outcomes were mortality and functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended or modified Rankin Scale). Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search identified 1342 records; 33 studies met inclusion criteria. CMD-glucose and CMD-lactate were the most commonly measure analytes (26 studies each), and the least was CMD-glycerol (12 studies). 9 studies have analyzed as a combined biochemical pattern or multimodal modality in relation to outcome. Higher CMD-glucose levels were mostly associated with better outcomes, whereas lower CMD-glucose and elevated CMD- LPR, CMD-glutamate and CMD-glycerol levels were associated with mortality or unfavorable functional outcome. However, analyte thresholds, probe locations, monitoring windows and outcome definitions varied widely and adjusted prognostic estimates were rarely reported. Certainty of evidence was predominantly low to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMD biomarkers show directional associations with outcome after moderate-to-severe TBI, but the evidence is heterogeneous and of low certainty, insufficient to support routine use of CMD analytes for prognostic stratification. Standardization of analyte thresholds, probe location, monitoring windows is needed before their prognostic value can be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"6 ","pages":"106659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13571572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2026.106659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cerebral microdialysis (CMD) enables bedside monitoring of cerebral metabolism after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review evaluates associations between CMD-derived analytes and mortality and functional outcome in adults with moderate-to-severe TBI.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) undergoing CMD monitoring of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR), glutamate, and/or glycerol. Prespecified outcomes were mortality and functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended or modified Rankin Scale). Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively.

Results: The database search identified 1342 records; 33 studies met inclusion criteria. CMD-glucose and CMD-lactate were the most commonly measure analytes (26 studies each), and the least was CMD-glycerol (12 studies). 9 studies have analyzed as a combined biochemical pattern or multimodal modality in relation to outcome. Higher CMD-glucose levels were mostly associated with better outcomes, whereas lower CMD-glucose and elevated CMD- LPR, CMD-glutamate and CMD-glycerol levels were associated with mortality or unfavorable functional outcome. However, analyte thresholds, probe locations, monitoring windows and outcome definitions varied widely and adjusted prognostic estimates were rarely reported. Certainty of evidence was predominantly low to very low.

Conclusion: CMD biomarkers show directional associations with outcome after moderate-to-severe TBI, but the evidence is heterogeneous and of low certainty, insufficient to support routine use of CMD analytes for prognostic stratification. Standardization of analyte thresholds, probe location, monitoring windows is needed before their prognostic value can be established.

颅脑外伤后脑微透析监测与临床预后的关系系统回顾。
目的:脑微透析(CMD)可用于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后脑代谢的床边监测。本系统综述评估了cd衍生分析物与中重度TBI成人患者死亡率和功能结局之间的关系。方法:对接受CMD监测葡萄糖、乳酸、丙酮酸、乳酸/丙酮酸比值(LPR)、谷氨酸和/或甘油的中重度TBI成年患者(格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤12)进行系统评价。预先指定的结局是死亡率和功能结局(格拉斯哥结局量表,格拉斯哥结局量表-扩展或修改的兰金量表)。由于研究间存在很大的异质性,研究结果是定性综合的。结果:数据库检索到1342条记录;33项研究符合纳入标准。cmd -葡萄糖和cmd -乳酸是最常见的测量分析物(各26项研究),最少的是cmd -甘油(12项研究)。9项研究分析了与结果相关的联合生化模式或多模式。较高的CMD-葡萄糖水平大多与较好的预后相关,而较低的CMD-葡萄糖水平和升高的CMD- LPR、CMD-谷氨酸和CMD-甘油水平与死亡率或不利的功能预后相关。然而,分析物阈值、探针位置、监测窗口和结果定义差异很大,调整后的预后估计很少报道。证据的确定性主要是低到非常低。结论:CMD生物标志物与中重度TBI后的预后有方向性关联,但证据不均匀且不确定,不足以支持常规使用CMD分析物进行预后分层。在确定其预测价值之前,需要标准化分析物阈值,探针位置,监测窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书