William Lammons, Lily Arnold, Sarah Mcmullen, Fiona Aspinal, Samina Begum, Katherine Barrett, Kate Walters, Andrew Clegg, Stuart Mackay-Thomas, Sara Humphrey, Danielle Nimmons
{"title":"Group Poetry and Quilt-Making -Creative Public Involvement Approaches to Contentious Concepts in Frailty Research.","authors":"William Lammons, Lily Arnold, Sarah Mcmullen, Fiona Aspinal, Samina Begum, Katherine Barrett, Kate Walters, Andrew Clegg, Stuart Mackay-Thomas, Sara Humphrey, Danielle Nimmons","doi":"10.1111/hex.70872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>'Frailty' as a concept is being increasingly integrated into healthcare, but the language around frailty is contentious and potentially stigmatising to patients. It is therefore important to understand how patients' lived experiences relate to the concept of frailty. We conducted 3 creative patient and public involvement (PPI) workshops to support the study, 'Exploring how the Electronic Frailty Index 2 (eFI2) can be best utilised in clinical practice.' Our aims for these workshops were to 1) improve our eFI2 project topic guide and data analysis 2) explore whether creative PPI can support engagement with contentious concepts like frailty, and 3) to understand how frailty can be communicated to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Creative PPI offers a means of addressing the shortcomings and challenges of PPI, including tokenism, accessibility, and inclusivity, by allowing patients and members of the public to contribute in different, individual, and non-discursive ways. We used group blackout poetry writing and quilt-making as creative PPI approaches to understand how patients relate to 'frailty.' We collaborated with PPI networks affiliated with the NIHR Applied Research Collaborations (ARCs) and a South Asian community organisation to recruit participants and used public collaborators to co-design and -deliver activities. We used qualitative thematic reflections to share findings from these activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two people attended three creative PPI workshops (two blackout poetry activities and one quilt-making activity). These activities provided three types of findings: 1) the impacts of the creative PPI activities on the eFI2 research process, 2) three thematic reflections, 'difficulties with 'frailty' as a term and concept,' 'personalising 'frailty' in patient communications,' and 'time pressures and dysfunction in healthcare services;' and 3) the creative outputs (text of two poems and an image of the quilt).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research and healthcare professionals should work towards discussing frailty with patients in terms and concepts that reflect their experiences and understanding and consider their overall health. Future research and PPI should focus on diverse cultural perspectives on frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70872"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13573230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: 'Frailty' as a concept is being increasingly integrated into healthcare, but the language around frailty is contentious and potentially stigmatising to patients. It is therefore important to understand how patients' lived experiences relate to the concept of frailty. We conducted 3 creative patient and public involvement (PPI) workshops to support the study, 'Exploring how the Electronic Frailty Index 2 (eFI2) can be best utilised in clinical practice.' Our aims for these workshops were to 1) improve our eFI2 project topic guide and data analysis 2) explore whether creative PPI can support engagement with contentious concepts like frailty, and 3) to understand how frailty can be communicated to patients.
Methods: Creative PPI offers a means of addressing the shortcomings and challenges of PPI, including tokenism, accessibility, and inclusivity, by allowing patients and members of the public to contribute in different, individual, and non-discursive ways. We used group blackout poetry writing and quilt-making as creative PPI approaches to understand how patients relate to 'frailty.' We collaborated with PPI networks affiliated with the NIHR Applied Research Collaborations (ARCs) and a South Asian community organisation to recruit participants and used public collaborators to co-design and -deliver activities. We used qualitative thematic reflections to share findings from these activities.
Results: Twenty-two people attended three creative PPI workshops (two blackout poetry activities and one quilt-making activity). These activities provided three types of findings: 1) the impacts of the creative PPI activities on the eFI2 research process, 2) three thematic reflections, 'difficulties with 'frailty' as a term and concept,' 'personalising 'frailty' in patient communications,' and 'time pressures and dysfunction in healthcare services;' and 3) the creative outputs (text of two poems and an image of the quilt).
Conclusion: Research and healthcare professionals should work towards discussing frailty with patients in terms and concepts that reflect their experiences and understanding and consider their overall health. Future research and PPI should focus on diverse cultural perspectives on frailty.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.