Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for prognosis in cerebral hemorrhage patients after hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

IF 4.2 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Medical Gas Research Pub Date : 2027-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-12 DOI:10.4103/mgr.MEDGASRES-D-25-00168
Congyi Ding, Jun Wu, Guangning Zhang, Xiaoming Feng, Jieyang Zhu
{"title":"Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for prognosis in cerebral hemorrhage patients after hyperbaric oxygen therapy.","authors":"Congyi Ding, Jun Wu, Guangning Zhang, Xiaoming Feng, Jieyang Zhu","doi":"10.4103/mgr.MEDGASRES-D-25-00168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracerebral hemorrhage is a common and critical neurological emergency, and the inconsistent results of hyperbaric oxygen therapy make predicting outcomes challenging. Therefore, a reliable predictive model for outcomes is needed to improve treatment plans. This study used interpretable machine learning to determine key risk factors linked to adverse outcomes in cerebral hemorrhage patient post-hyperbaric oxygen therapy. To improve prognostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making, we analyzed the data from 401 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received hyperbaric oxygen therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing, China, using multivariate logistic regression and machine learning to develop predictive models, with model performance assessed via 10-fold cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations values aided in model interpretation and in the development of a logistic regression-based nomogram. Based on the modified Rankin scale, patients were stratified into two prognostic groups: a good prognosis group (modified Rankin scale < 3, n = 265) and a poor prognosis group (modified Rankin scale ≥ 3, n = 136). Significant differences in various factors were observed between the groups. Independent risk factors identified included the Glasgow coma scale score, computed tomography hemorrhage volume, activities of daily living score, treatment modality, intraventricular bleeding, and rebleeding. Among the models tested, the random forest algorithm yielded the highest predictive performance (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.99). The study identified key predictors, including activities of daily living score, computed tomography hemorrhage volume, and Glasgow coma scale score, as factors influencing hyperbaric oxygen therapy outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. Random Forest model demonstrated strong predictive capability, with SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis providing insights into individual risk factors. Overall, these findings are crucial for improving clinical decision-making and personalized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18559,"journal":{"name":"Medical Gas Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2027-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13667389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Gas Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgr.MEDGASRES-D-25-00168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage is a common and critical neurological emergency, and the inconsistent results of hyperbaric oxygen therapy make predicting outcomes challenging. Therefore, a reliable predictive model for outcomes is needed to improve treatment plans. This study used interpretable machine learning to determine key risk factors linked to adverse outcomes in cerebral hemorrhage patient post-hyperbaric oxygen therapy. To improve prognostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making, we analyzed the data from 401 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received hyperbaric oxygen therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing, China, using multivariate logistic regression and machine learning to develop predictive models, with model performance assessed via 10-fold cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations values aided in model interpretation and in the development of a logistic regression-based nomogram. Based on the modified Rankin scale, patients were stratified into two prognostic groups: a good prognosis group (modified Rankin scale < 3, n = 265) and a poor prognosis group (modified Rankin scale ≥ 3, n = 136). Significant differences in various factors were observed between the groups. Independent risk factors identified included the Glasgow coma scale score, computed tomography hemorrhage volume, activities of daily living score, treatment modality, intraventricular bleeding, and rebleeding. Among the models tested, the random forest algorithm yielded the highest predictive performance (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.99). The study identified key predictors, including activities of daily living score, computed tomography hemorrhage volume, and Glasgow coma scale score, as factors influencing hyperbaric oxygen therapy outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. Random Forest model demonstrated strong predictive capability, with SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis providing insights into individual risk factors. Overall, these findings are crucial for improving clinical decision-making and personalized treatment.

基于机器学习的脑出血患者高压氧治疗后预后预测模型的开发和验证。
脑出血是一种常见的、严重的神经系统急症,高压氧治疗结果不一致使得预后预测具有挑战性。因此,需要一个可靠的预后预测模型来改进治疗方案。本研究使用可解释的机器学习来确定与脑出血患者高压氧治疗后不良结果相关的关键危险因素。为了提高预后准确性和支持临床决策,我们分析了中国嘉兴市第一附属医院接受高压氧治疗的401例脑出血患者的数据,使用多变量逻辑回归和机器学习建立预测模型,并通过10倍交叉验证评估模型的性能。SHapley加性解释值有助于模型解释和基于逻辑回归的nomogram发展。根据改良Rankin量表将患者分为两组:预后良好组(改良Rankin量表< 3,n = 265)和预后差组(改良Rankin量表≥3,n = 136)。各组间各因素差异均有统计学意义。确定的独立危险因素包括格拉斯哥昏迷评分、计算机断层扫描出血量、日常生活活动评分、治疗方式、脑室内出血和再出血。在测试的模型中,随机森林算法的预测性能最高(接收者工作特征曲线下面积= 0.99)。该研究确定了影响脑出血患者高压氧治疗结果的关键预测因素,包括日常生活活动评分、计算机断层扫描出血量和格拉斯哥昏迷评分。随机森林模型显示出强大的预测能力,SHapley加性解释分析提供了对个体风险因素的见解。总的来说,这些发现对于改善临床决策和个性化治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Gas Research
Medical Gas Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Medical Gas Research is an open access journal which publishes basic, translational, and clinical research focusing on the neurobiology as well as multidisciplinary aspects of medical gas research and their applications to related disorders. The journal covers all areas of medical gas research, but also has several special sections. Authors can submit directly to these sections, whose peer-review process is overseen by our distinguished Section Editors: Inert gases - Edited by Xuejun Sun and Mark Coburn, Gasotransmitters - Edited by Atsunori Nakao and John Calvert, Oxygen and diving medicine - Edited by Daniel Rossignol and Ke Jian Liu, Anesthetic gases - Edited by Richard Applegate and Zhongcong Xie, Medical gas in other fields of biology - Edited by John Zhang. Medical gas is a large family including oxygen, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, nitrous oxide, carbon disulfide, argon, helium and other noble gases. These medical gases are used in multiple fields of clinical practice and basic science research including anesthesiology, hyperbaric oxygen medicine, diving medicine, internal medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and many basic sciences disciplines such as physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, microbiology and neurosciences. Due to the unique nature of medical gas practice, Medical Gas Research will serve as an information platform for educational and technological advances in the field of medical gas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书