Partner- and Mode-Specific Social Contact and Poor Mental Health Among Older Adults in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2024 JACSIS Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kazumi Kubota, Miya Aishima, Yukiko Matsumura, Takeshi Miura, Takahiro Tabuchi
{"title":"Partner- and Mode-Specific Social Contact and Poor Mental Health Among Older Adults in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2024 JACSIS Study.","authors":"Kazumi Kubota, Miya Aishima, Yukiko Matsumura, Takeshi Miura, Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1111/ggi.70840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine whether social contact frequency is differentially associated with poor mental health by interaction partner and contact mode among older adults in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the 2024 Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS; December 2024-January 2025). All respondents aged ≥ 65 years in the analysis-ready dataset were included; no analytic variables had missing values. Poor mental health was defined as ≥ 1 versus 0 poor mental health days in the past 30 days (CDC Healthy Days item). Eight past-month partner-mode exposures (family or friends by in-person, phone, email/messages, or video call) were categorized as none, 1-3 times/month, or ≥ 1 time/week. Logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for demographic, health, lifestyle, physical activity, employment, education, and household income. False discovery rate control was applied across 16 prespecified contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6786 older adults (mean age 72.7 years; 50.4% men), 11.8% reported ≥ 1 poor mental health day. In fully adjusted models, more frequent in-person contact was associated with lower odds of poor mental health for friends/acquaintances (vs none: 1-3/month OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.84; ≥ 1/week 0.59, 0.48-0.73) and non-cohabiting family/relatives (0.84, 0.71-0.99; 0.71, 0.57-0.89). Remote modes were not clearly associated. After multiplicity control, weekly in-person family contact and both friend in-person frequencies remained significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frequent in-person contact, especially with friends, was associated with lower odds of poor mental health, whereas most remote modes were not, even after adjustment for education and household income.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"26 9","pages":"e70840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13572026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.70840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine whether social contact frequency is differentially associated with poor mental health by interaction partner and contact mode among older adults in Japan.

Methods: We analyzed the 2024 Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS; December 2024-January 2025). All respondents aged ≥ 65 years in the analysis-ready dataset were included; no analytic variables had missing values. Poor mental health was defined as ≥ 1 versus 0 poor mental health days in the past 30 days (CDC Healthy Days item). Eight past-month partner-mode exposures (family or friends by in-person, phone, email/messages, or video call) were categorized as none, 1-3 times/month, or ≥ 1 time/week. Logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for demographic, health, lifestyle, physical activity, employment, education, and household income. False discovery rate control was applied across 16 prespecified contrasts.

Results: Among 6786 older adults (mean age 72.7 years; 50.4% men), 11.8% reported ≥ 1 poor mental health day. In fully adjusted models, more frequent in-person contact was associated with lower odds of poor mental health for friends/acquaintances (vs none: 1-3/month OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.84; ≥ 1/week 0.59, 0.48-0.73) and non-cohabiting family/relatives (0.84, 0.71-0.99; 0.71, 0.57-0.89). Remote modes were not clearly associated. After multiplicity control, weekly in-person family contact and both friend in-person frequencies remained significant.

Conclusions: Frequent in-person contact, especially with friends, was associated with lower odds of poor mental health, whereas most remote modes were not, even after adjustment for education and household income.

日本老年人中特定伴侣和特定模式的社会接触与不良心理健康:2024年JACSIS研究的横断面分析
目的:探讨日本老年人社会接触频率与不良心理健康状况之间的关系是否与交往对象和接触方式存在差异。方法:分析2024年日本新冠肺炎和社会网络调查(JACSIS; 2024年12月- 2025年1月)。所有年龄≥65岁的受访者都被纳入分析就绪数据集;分析变量没有缺失值。不良心理健康被定义为在过去30天内≥1和0个不良心理健康日(CDC健康日项目)。过去一个月的八次伴侣模式暴露(当面、电话、电子邮件/短信或视频通话的家人或朋友)被归类为无、1-3次/月或≥1次/周。Logistic回归估计了调整后的优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci),调整了人口统计学、健康、生活方式、体育活动、就业、教育和家庭收入。错误发现率控制应用于16个预先指定的对比。结果:在6786名老年人中(平均年龄72.7岁,男性50.4%),11.8%报告≥1个心理健康不良日。在完全调整的模型中,更频繁的面对面接触与朋友/熟人(vs无:1-3/月OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.84;≥1/周0.59,0.48-0.73)和非同居家庭/亲戚(0.84,0.71-0.99;0.71,0.57-0.89)的心理健康状况不佳的几率较低相关。远程模式没有明显的关联。在多重性控制后,每周面对面的家庭联系和朋友面对面的频率仍然显著。结论:频繁的面对面接触,尤其是与朋友的接触,与心理健康状况不佳的几率较低有关,而大多数远程接触方式则与此无关,即使在调整了教育和家庭收入之后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书