Artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: From machine learning to large language models.

IF 9.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shichang Zhang, Yingjian Zhan, Kun Xu, Hongwei Zhou
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: From machine learning to large language models.","authors":"Shichang Zhang, Yingjian Zhan, Kun Xu, Hongwei Zhou","doi":"10.1097/CM9.0000000000004291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into laboratory medicine has undergone a remarkable evolution over the past decade, shifting from traditional machine learning (ML) applied to structured laboratory data to the recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) capable of processing unstructured clinical text, interpreting complex laboratory findings, and supporting clinical decision-making. This narrative review traces that progression and critically compares four main AI paradigms accessible to laboratory professionals: conventional ML, deep learning, general-purpose LLMs, and laboratory-specific foundation models. We examine representative application domains-blood cell morphological analysis, autoverification, acute infectious risk stratification, interpretation of urinalysis data, clinical decision support, and report generation-and assess the maturity of the evidence for each domain. Laboratories contemplating AI adoption face a distinctive set of challenges: preanalytical variability, interplatform calibration differences, effects of the specimen quality, reagent-lot sensitivity, and the context dependence of result interpretation, all of which demand validation practices beyond those that are standard in general medical AI research. We conclude that AI is best positioned, in the near term, as an assistive layer rather than an autonomous agent. Its deployment requires a clear problem definition, disciplined data engineering, external validation, prospective silent trials, human-in-the-loop oversight, and postdeployment surveillance aligned with existing laboratory quality systems. We additionally discussed the rationale for developing vertically oriented, laboratory-specific foundation models that can integrate structured results, longitudinal patient data, quality-control metadata, instrument information, and clinical knowledge. Clinical accountability must remain with qualified laboratory professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10183,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000004291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into laboratory medicine has undergone a remarkable evolution over the past decade, shifting from traditional machine learning (ML) applied to structured laboratory data to the recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) capable of processing unstructured clinical text, interpreting complex laboratory findings, and supporting clinical decision-making. This narrative review traces that progression and critically compares four main AI paradigms accessible to laboratory professionals: conventional ML, deep learning, general-purpose LLMs, and laboratory-specific foundation models. We examine representative application domains-blood cell morphological analysis, autoverification, acute infectious risk stratification, interpretation of urinalysis data, clinical decision support, and report generation-and assess the maturity of the evidence for each domain. Laboratories contemplating AI adoption face a distinctive set of challenges: preanalytical variability, interplatform calibration differences, effects of the specimen quality, reagent-lot sensitivity, and the context dependence of result interpretation, all of which demand validation practices beyond those that are standard in general medical AI research. We conclude that AI is best positioned, in the near term, as an assistive layer rather than an autonomous agent. Its deployment requires a clear problem definition, disciplined data engineering, external validation, prospective silent trials, human-in-the-loop oversight, and postdeployment surveillance aligned with existing laboratory quality systems. We additionally discussed the rationale for developing vertically oriented, laboratory-specific foundation models that can integrate structured results, longitudinal patient data, quality-control metadata, instrument information, and clinical knowledge. Clinical accountability must remain with qualified laboratory professionals.

实验室医学中的人工智能:从机器学习到大型语言模型。
摘要:人工智能(AI)与检验医学的整合在过去十年中经历了显著的发展,从传统的机器学习(ML)应用于结构化的实验室数据,到最近出现的大型语言模型(llm),能够处理非结构化的临床文本,解释复杂的实验室结果,并支持临床决策。本文回顾了这一进程,并批判性地比较了实验室专业人员可以使用的四种主要人工智能范式:传统机器学习、深度学习、通用法学硕士和实验室特定基础模型。我们研究了具有代表性的应用领域——血细胞形态分析、自动验证、急性感染风险分层、尿液分析数据的解释、临床决策支持和报告生成——并评估了每个领域证据的成熟度。考虑采用人工智能的实验室面临着一系列独特的挑战:分析前变异性、平台间校准差异、标本质量的影响、试剂批次敏感性以及结果解释的上下文依赖性,所有这些都需要超出一般医学人工智能研究标准的验证实践。我们得出的结论是,在短期内,人工智能的最佳定位是作为辅助层,而不是自主代理。它的部署需要明确的问题定义、严格的数据工程、外部验证、前瞻性沉默试验、人在环监督以及与现有实验室质量系统一致的部署后监督。我们还讨论了开发垂直导向的实验室特定基础模型的基本原理,该模型可以集成结构化结果、纵向患者数据、质量控制元数据、仪器信息和临床知识。临床责任必须由合格的实验室专业人员承担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Journal
Chinese Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
19245
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Chinese Medical Journal (CMJ) is published semimonthly in English by the Chinese Medical Association, and is a peer reviewed general medical journal for all doctors, researchers, and health workers regardless of their medical specialty or type of employment. Established in 1887, it is the oldest medical periodical in China and is distributed worldwide. The journal functions as a window into China’s medical sciences and reflects the advances and progress in China’s medical sciences and technology. It serves the objective of international academic exchange. The journal includes Original Articles, Editorial, Review Articles, Medical Progress, Brief Reports, Case Reports, Viewpoint, Clinical Exchange, Letter,and News,etc. CMJ is abstracted or indexed in many databases including Biological Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Index Medicus/Medline, Science Citation Index (SCI), Current Contents, Cancerlit, Health Plan & Administration, Embase, Social Scisearch, Aidsline, Toxline, Biocommercial Abstracts, Arts and Humanities Search, Nuclear Science Abstracts, Water Resources Abstracts, Cab Abstracts, Occupation Safety & Health, etc. In 2007, the impact factor of the journal by SCI is 0.636, and the total citation is 2315.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书