ATriple Comparative Study for Burn Wound Healing: Standard Treatment vs Quantum-Smart Proteins vs Laser-Activated QSPs Using in silico Simulation.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-09-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCID.S552824
Khalid A Alfaifi
{"title":"ATriple Comparative Study for Burn Wound Healing: Standard Treatment vs Quantum-Smart Proteins vs Laser-Activated QSPs Using in silico Simulation.","authors":"Khalid A Alfaifi","doi":"10.2147/CCID.S552824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn injuries remain a major clinical challenge due to delayed healing, infection risk, and fibrosis. This study employed in silico simulations to compare three therapeutic strategies: (1) silver sulfadiazine (standard care), (2) Quantum-Smart Proteins (QSPs) designed using AI and structural modeling, and (3) QSPs combined with Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT, 808 nm, 2 J/cm<sup>2</sup>). Simulated outcomes over 21 days included re-epithelialization, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and tissue biomechanics. Results indicated that QSPs improved wound healing compared to standard care, with the QSP+LLLT group showing the most favorable outcomes. These findings are preliminary and computational in nature but highlight QSPs as a promising avenue for regenerative therapeutics that warrants experimental validation. All findings in this study represent computational predictions only and have not been experimentally validated.</p>","PeriodicalId":10447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","volume":"19 ","pages":"552824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13571634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S552824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn injuries remain a major clinical challenge due to delayed healing, infection risk, and fibrosis. This study employed in silico simulations to compare three therapeutic strategies: (1) silver sulfadiazine (standard care), (2) Quantum-Smart Proteins (QSPs) designed using AI and structural modeling, and (3) QSPs combined with Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT, 808 nm, 2 J/cm2). Simulated outcomes over 21 days included re-epithelialization, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and tissue biomechanics. Results indicated that QSPs improved wound healing compared to standard care, with the QSP+LLLT group showing the most favorable outcomes. These findings are preliminary and computational in nature but highlight QSPs as a promising avenue for regenerative therapeutics that warrants experimental validation. All findings in this study represent computational predictions only and have not been experimentally validated.

烧伤创面愈合的三重比较研究:标准治疗与量子智能蛋白与激光激活QSPs使用硅模拟。
由于延迟愈合、感染风险和纤维化,烧伤仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。本研究采用计算机模拟比较了三种治疗策略:(1)磺胺嘧啶银(标准治疗),(2)使用人工智能和结构建模设计的量子智能蛋白(QSPs),以及(3)QSPs联合低水平激光治疗(808 nm, 2 J/cm2)。21天的模拟结果包括再上皮化、纤维化、血管生成和组织生物力学。结果表明,与标准护理相比,QSP改善了伤口愈合,QSP+LLLT组显示出最有利的结果。这些发现是初步的,本质上是计算性的,但突出了QSPs作为再生治疗的有前途的途径,值得实验验证。本研究的所有发现仅代表计算预测,尚未经过实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin disease and cosmetic interventions. Normal and pathological processes in skin development and aging, their modification and treatment, as well as basic research into histology of dermal and dermal structures that provide clinical insights and potential treatment options are key topics for the journal. Patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new management options to optimize outcomes for target conditions constitute major areas of interest. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of clinical studies, reviews and original research in skin research and skin care. All areas of dermatology will be covered; contributions will be welcomed from all clinicians and basic science researchers globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书