Lindi Jahiu, Jonathan Cinnamon, Agnieszka Leszczynski
{"title":"VISUAL NEGOTIATIONS OF GENTRIFICATION IN TORONTO: Contestation, Politicization and Resistance through Urban Signage","authors":"Lindi Jahiu, Jonathan Cinnamon, Agnieszka Leszczynski","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article engages signage as a medium through which urban stakeholders negotiate the politics of housing redevelopment and gentrification in cities. Focusing on Toronto, we examine housing-related signage in three neighbourhoods where social mix approaches to redevelopment have ushered in gentrification: Parkdale, Regent Park, and Moss Park. We identify three types of signs through which these politics are expressed: notice of proposed development boards, developer-branded placards, and paper posters. By analyzing both the original contents of and ad hoc changes made to select instances of these signs, we identify that gentrification through housing (re)development is <i>contested</i>, <i>de-</i> and <i>re-politicized</i> and <i>resisted</i>. In Parkdale, notice of proposed development boards communicate imminent transformations of the neighbourhood, while constituting a medium through which they are <i>contested</i>. In Regent Park, developer-branded placards <i>depoliticize</i> redevelopment through discursive commodifications of diversity, while also allowing for these commodifications to be <i>repoliticized</i>. In Moss Park, paper posters mobilize grassroots <i>resistance</i> to private condominium development. We argue that more attention should be paid to ad hoc alterations to signage beyond their explicit messaging, as a source of street-level insight into how multi-stakeholder gentrification politics materially unfold in cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","volume":"50 5","pages":"1152-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2427.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.70071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article engages signage as a medium through which urban stakeholders negotiate the politics of housing redevelopment and gentrification in cities. Focusing on Toronto, we examine housing-related signage in three neighbourhoods where social mix approaches to redevelopment have ushered in gentrification: Parkdale, Regent Park, and Moss Park. We identify three types of signs through which these politics are expressed: notice of proposed development boards, developer-branded placards, and paper posters. By analyzing both the original contents of and ad hoc changes made to select instances of these signs, we identify that gentrification through housing (re)development is contested, de- and re-politicized and resisted. In Parkdale, notice of proposed development boards communicate imminent transformations of the neighbourhood, while constituting a medium through which they are contested. In Regent Park, developer-branded placards depoliticize redevelopment through discursive commodifications of diversity, while also allowing for these commodifications to be repoliticized. In Moss Park, paper posters mobilize grassroots resistance to private condominium development. We argue that more attention should be paid to ad hoc alterations to signage beyond their explicit messaging, as a source of street-level insight into how multi-stakeholder gentrification politics materially unfold in cities.
期刊介绍:
A groundbreaking forum for intellectual debate, IJURR is at the forefront of urban and regional research. With a cutting edge approach to linking theoretical development and empirical research, and a consistent demand for quality, IJURR encompasses key material from an unparalleled range of critical, comparative and geographic perspectives. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach to the field, IJURR is essential reading for social scientists with a concern for the complex, changing roles and futures of cities and regions.