Adjustable Pediatric Prosthetic Sockets to Accommodate Growth in Children and Adolescents With Limb Loss

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Timothy R. Dillingham MS, MD, Jessica Kenia MS, Laura Prosser PT, PhD, James Marschalek MS, Frances Shofer PhD, Liliana E. Pezzin PhD
{"title":"Adjustable Pediatric Prosthetic Sockets to Accommodate Growth in Children and Adolescents With Limb Loss","authors":"Timothy R. Dillingham MS, MD,&nbsp;Jessica Kenia MS,&nbsp;Laura Prosser PT, PhD,&nbsp;James Marschalek MS,&nbsp;Frances Shofer PhD,&nbsp;Liliana E. Pezzin PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2026.100670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility, comfort, user satisfaction, and functional performance of an adjustable, immediate-fit prosthetic socket in children and adolescents with lower-limb loss.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Gait and biomechanics lab in an outpatient rehabilitation hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-eight pediatric participants (14 boys, 14 girls; average age 11.5±4.0y) were enrolled; 26 were eligible for the home trial.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>Each participant was fit with an adjustable, immediate-fit prosthesis, which was compared with the users’ conventional devices.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) scores (use and satisfaction) with additional items on comfort; temporal gait parameters (gait speed, single-limb support); intrasocket pressure measurements; and adverse events (falls, skin irritation, device issues).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen participants completed follow-up. Overall PEQ scores favored the adjustable device, although not significantly (45.8 vs 42.5, <em>P</em>=.29). Ease of socket adjustment demonstrated a significant advantage for the adjustable prosthesis (mean difference=1.53, <em>P</em>=.0019). Participants also reported improved temperature and perspiration control (mean difference=1.07, <em>P</em>=.0007). Walking speed did not differ between devices (<em>P</em>=.24), and intrasocket pressures were comparable (<em>P</em>=.74). No skin irritation, skin breakdown, or mechanical failures were observed or reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The adjustable, immediate-fit pediatric prosthetic system was feasible and well accepted. It performed comparably with conventional devices on gait and pressure metrics and demonstrated ease of use and improvements in factors associated with skin integrity. These findings suggest that adjustable sockets may offer a practical, affordable alternative for children and families seeking a device that can accommodate growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109526000868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, comfort, user satisfaction, and functional performance of an adjustable, immediate-fit prosthetic socket in children and adolescents with lower-limb loss.

Design

Prospective clinical trial.

Setting

Gait and biomechanics lab in an outpatient rehabilitation hospital.

Participants

Twenty-eight pediatric participants (14 boys, 14 girls; average age 11.5±4.0y) were enrolled; 26 were eligible for the home trial.

Intervention

Each participant was fit with an adjustable, immediate-fit prosthesis, which was compared with the users’ conventional devices.

Main Outcome Measures

Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) scores (use and satisfaction) with additional items on comfort; temporal gait parameters (gait speed, single-limb support); intrasocket pressure measurements; and adverse events (falls, skin irritation, device issues).

Results

Fifteen participants completed follow-up. Overall PEQ scores favored the adjustable device, although not significantly (45.8 vs 42.5, P=.29). Ease of socket adjustment demonstrated a significant advantage for the adjustable prosthesis (mean difference=1.53, P=.0019). Participants also reported improved temperature and perspiration control (mean difference=1.07, P=.0007). Walking speed did not differ between devices (P=.24), and intrasocket pressures were comparable (P=.74). No skin irritation, skin breakdown, or mechanical failures were observed or reported.

Conclusions

The adjustable, immediate-fit pediatric prosthetic system was feasible and well accepted. It performed comparably with conventional devices on gait and pressure metrics and demonstrated ease of use and improvements in factors associated with skin integrity. These findings suggest that adjustable sockets may offer a practical, affordable alternative for children and families seeking a device that can accommodate growth.
可调节的儿童假肢插座适应儿童和青少年肢体丧失的生长
目的评价一种可调节、即刻贴合的义肢窝在儿童和青少年下肢缺失患者中的可行性、舒适性、使用者满意度和功能性能。前瞻性临床试验。在门诊康复医院设置步态和生物力学实验室。纳入28名儿科受试者(男孩14名,女孩14名,平均年龄11.5±4.0岁);26人有资格参加家庭试验。干预每位参与者都配备了一个可调节的,立即适合的假体,并与用户的传统设备进行比较。主要结果测量:假体评估问卷(PEQ)评分(使用和满意度)与舒适度附加项目;时间步态参数(步态速度、单肢支撑);套管内压力测量;以及不良事件(跌倒、皮肤刺激、器械问题)。结果15名参与者完成随访。总体PEQ评分倾向于可调节装置,但并不显著(45.8比42.5,P= 0.29)。可调节假体易于调节窝显示出显著的优势(平均差异=1.53,P= 0.0019)。参与者还报告了体温和排汗控制的改善(平均差异=1.07,P= 0.0007)。行走速度在不同装置之间没有差异(P= 0.24),而套内压力具有可比性(P= 0.74)。没有观察到或报告皮肤刺激、皮肤破裂或机械故障。结论可调节、即刻贴合的儿童假体系统是可行的,并且被广泛接受。它在步态和压力指标上与传统装置表现相当,并证明易于使用和改善与皮肤完整性相关的因素。这些发现表明,可调节的插座可能为儿童和家庭提供一种实用的、负担得起的选择,可以适应成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书