Can the new energy demonstration city pilot boost energy justice? A spatial difference-in-differences analysis

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102346
Wei Fan, Siyan Xiang, Senmiao Yang, Junchen Yan
{"title":"Can the new energy demonstration city pilot boost energy justice? A spatial difference-in-differences analysis","authors":"Wei Fan,&nbsp;Siyan Xiang,&nbsp;Senmiao Yang,&nbsp;Junchen Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy justice is central to achieving a fair and inclusive energy transition. Using balanced panel data for 282 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2022, this study employs a spatial difference-in-differences approach to examine the relationship between New Energy Demonstration City pilot designation and urban energy justice while accounting for inter-city spatial spillovers. The analysis yields three main findings. First, the SDID estimates suggest that NEDC pilot designation is associated with higher local energy justice, while the spatial estimates indicate positive cumulative spillovers across spatially connected cities. Second, industrial structure upgrading and regional development inequality moderate the estimated policy relationships in different ways, with industrial structure upgrading strengthening both the local relationship and spatial spillovers, whereas regional development inequality weakens the local relationship but has no significant moderating effect on spatial spillovers. Third, the local estimates are relatively larger in eastern and central regions and in large cities, while the estimated spatial spillovers are stronger in resource-based cities and cities with higher renewable energy endowments. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating spatial linkages and local development conditions into the design and evaluation of new energy policies aimed at advancing energy justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102346"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26003135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy justice is central to achieving a fair and inclusive energy transition. Using balanced panel data for 282 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2022, this study employs a spatial difference-in-differences approach to examine the relationship between New Energy Demonstration City pilot designation and urban energy justice while accounting for inter-city spatial spillovers. The analysis yields three main findings. First, the SDID estimates suggest that NEDC pilot designation is associated with higher local energy justice, while the spatial estimates indicate positive cumulative spillovers across spatially connected cities. Second, industrial structure upgrading and regional development inequality moderate the estimated policy relationships in different ways, with industrial structure upgrading strengthening both the local relationship and spatial spillovers, whereas regional development inequality weakens the local relationship but has no significant moderating effect on spatial spillovers. Third, the local estimates are relatively larger in eastern and central regions and in large cities, while the estimated spatial spillovers are stronger in resource-based cities and cities with higher renewable energy endowments. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating spatial linkages and local development conditions into the design and evaluation of new energy policies aimed at advancing energy justice.
新能源示范城市试点能否促进能源公平?空间差中差分析
能源公正是实现公平和包容的能源转型的核心。本文利用2010 - 2022年中国282个地级市的均衡面板数据,在考虑城市间空间溢出效应的基础上,采用空间差中差的方法考察了新能源示范城市试点与城市能源公平之间的关系。分析得出了三个主要发现。首先,SDID估计表明,新能源发展中心试点与更高的地方能源公平有关,而空间估计表明,在空间相连的城市之间存在积极的累积溢出效应。第二,产业结构升级和区域发展不平等对政策关系的调节作用不同,产业结构升级对地方关系和空间溢出都有增强作用,而区域发展不平等对地方关系有减弱作用,但对空间溢出没有显著调节作用。③东部、中部地区和大城市的局部溢出效应较大,资源型城市和可再生能源禀赋较高的城市空间溢出效应较大。这些发现强调了将空间联系和当地发展条件纳入旨在促进能源公正的新能源政策的设计和评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书