Robust OCT-based thenar skin thickness quantification via a dual-path extraction framework

IF 4.7 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.sbsr.2026.101076
MingHui Chen, ZhengMao Zhao, WeiJie Xing, XiaoRu Feng, Chang Chen, Lin Zhou, You Wu
{"title":"Robust OCT-based thenar skin thickness quantification via a dual-path extraction framework","authors":"MingHui Chen,&nbsp;ZhengMao Zhao,&nbsp;WeiJie Xing,&nbsp;XiaoRu Feng,&nbsp;Chang Chen,&nbsp;Lin Zhou,&nbsp;You Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.sbsr.2026.101076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate skin-layer thickness quantification is needed for depth calibration in multiple μ-spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (mμSORS)-based noninvasive glucose sensing. Existing OCT-based analyses often estimate skin thickness from depth-intensity profiles generated by large-scale A-line averaging. However, this averaging can attenuate the OCT-visible lower stratum corneum (SC) boundary and make SC thickness estimation unstable in some volumes. Here, we present a dual-path SC thickness quantification framework. The framework uses the conventional profile-based pathway when the SC-related profile feature is preserved, and uses a segmentation-based recovery pathway when profile cues are degraded. In the recovery pathway, SC thickness is computed from spatially explicit SC boundaries delineated on individual B-scans, thereby reducing information loss caused by global averaging. On an independent thickness-evaluation cohort of 26 participants with 156 manually annotated B-scans, the framework showed strong agreement with manual reference measurements, with a participant-level MAE of 5.17 μm (0.6466 pixels) and RMSE of 6.58 μm (0.8225 pixels). These results suggest that OCT-derived SC thickness can provide useful geometric information for mμSORS depth calibration, especially when conventional profile-based estimation is unstable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":424,"journal":{"name":"Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101076"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214180426001273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate skin-layer thickness quantification is needed for depth calibration in multiple μ-spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (mμSORS)-based noninvasive glucose sensing. Existing OCT-based analyses often estimate skin thickness from depth-intensity profiles generated by large-scale A-line averaging. However, this averaging can attenuate the OCT-visible lower stratum corneum (SC) boundary and make SC thickness estimation unstable in some volumes. Here, we present a dual-path SC thickness quantification framework. The framework uses the conventional profile-based pathway when the SC-related profile feature is preserved, and uses a segmentation-based recovery pathway when profile cues are degraded. In the recovery pathway, SC thickness is computed from spatially explicit SC boundaries delineated on individual B-scans, thereby reducing information loss caused by global averaging. On an independent thickness-evaluation cohort of 26 participants with 156 manually annotated B-scans, the framework showed strong agreement with manual reference measurements, with a participant-level MAE of 5.17 μm (0.6466 pixels) and RMSE of 6.58 μm (0.8225 pixels). These results suggest that OCT-derived SC thickness can provide useful geometric information for mμSORS depth calibration, especially when conventional profile-based estimation is unstable.
基于oct的双路径提取框架稳健鱼际皮肤厚度定量
在基于多μ-空间偏移拉曼光谱的无创葡萄糖传感中,需要精确的皮肤层厚度定量来进行深度校准。现有的基于oct的分析通常通过大规模a线平均生成的深度-强度剖面来估计皮肤厚度。然而,这种平均会减弱oct可见的下角质层(SC)边界,并使某些体积的SC厚度估计不稳定。在这里,我们提出了一个双路径SC厚度量化框架。当sc相关的概要特征被保留时,该框架使用传统的基于概要的路径,当概要线索被降级时,该框架使用基于分段的恢复路径。在恢复路径中,SC的厚度是从单个b扫描上划定的空间明确的SC边界计算的,从而减少了全局平均造成的信息损失。在一个由26名参与者组成的独立厚度评估队列中,该框架与手动参考测量结果高度一致,参与者水平MAE为5.17 μm(0.6466像素),RMSE为6.58 μm(0.8225像素)。这些结果表明,oct衍生的SC厚度可以为μ μ s深度校准提供有用的几何信息,特别是在传统的基于剖面的估计不稳定的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research
Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
68
审稿时长
87 days
期刊介绍: Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research is an open access journal dedicated to the research, design, development, and application of bio-sensing and sensing technologies. The editors will accept research papers, reviews, field trials, and validation studies that are of significant relevance. These submissions should describe new concepts, enhance understanding of the field, or offer insights into the practical application, manufacturing, and commercialization of bio-sensing and sensing technologies. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including sensing principles and mechanisms, new materials development for transducers and recognition components, fabrication technology, and various types of sensors such as optical, electrochemical, mass-sensitive, gas, biosensors, and more. It also includes environmental, process control, and biomedical applications, signal processing, chemometrics, optoelectronic, mechanical, thermal, and magnetic sensors, as well as interface electronics. Additionally, it covers sensor systems and applications, µTAS (Micro Total Analysis Systems), development of solid-state devices for transducing physical signals, and analytical devices incorporating biological materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书