Influence of pore structure characteristics on the mechanical response of cementitious materials to high water pressure

Results in Materials Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.rinma.2026.101035
Bounvatsana Kounnavong, Mitsuyasu Iwanami
{"title":"Influence of pore structure characteristics on the mechanical response of cementitious materials to high water pressure","authors":"Bounvatsana Kounnavong,&nbsp;Mitsuyasu Iwanami","doi":"10.1016/j.rinma.2026.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deep-sea infrastructure requires cementitious materials capable of withstanding high hydrostatic pressure. However, the mechanisms governing pressure-induced damage, particularly the role of pore structure characteristics, remain insufficiently understood. This study investigated the response of OPC-based and geopolymer-based mortars exposed to 45 MPa water pressure for 22 h. Mechanical properties, water absorption characteristics, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and microstructural observations were used to evaluate pressure-induced changes. Among the OPC-based mortars, OPC, FA20 (20% fly ash replacement), and S60 (60% slag replacement) exhibited only minor changes after pressure exposure, with compressive strength variations within ±3%. In contrast, the air-entrained mixture showed approximately 19% increases in both absorption capacity and accessible porosity, accompanied by modest mechanical degradation. The geopolymer systems exhibited markedly different behavior despite comparable initial compressive strengths. GP1 (fly ash–slag) developed visible cracking and experienced reductions of 23.4% and 17.8% in compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, respectively, whereas GP2 (fly ash) remained mechanically stable. MIP revealed substantial pore structure differences. GP1 exhibited a finer pore structure (∼7 nm dominant pore size), while cross-sectional observations revealed numerous entrapped air voids uncaptured by MIP. The results indicate that conventional parameters such as compressive strength, absorption capacity, and accessible porosity alone were insufficient to explain the observed pressure response. Building on these observations, a conceptual pressure-equalization mechanism is proposed: materials facilitating pressure transmission throughout an interconnected pore network accommodate prolonged hydrostatic loading, whereas hindered pressure equalization—caused by fine pore structures and isolated internal voids—leads to localized stress concentrations and mechanical deterioration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101087,"journal":{"name":"Results in Materials","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X26001512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep-sea infrastructure requires cementitious materials capable of withstanding high hydrostatic pressure. However, the mechanisms governing pressure-induced damage, particularly the role of pore structure characteristics, remain insufficiently understood. This study investigated the response of OPC-based and geopolymer-based mortars exposed to 45 MPa water pressure for 22 h. Mechanical properties, water absorption characteristics, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and microstructural observations were used to evaluate pressure-induced changes. Among the OPC-based mortars, OPC, FA20 (20% fly ash replacement), and S60 (60% slag replacement) exhibited only minor changes after pressure exposure, with compressive strength variations within ±3%. In contrast, the air-entrained mixture showed approximately 19% increases in both absorption capacity and accessible porosity, accompanied by modest mechanical degradation. The geopolymer systems exhibited markedly different behavior despite comparable initial compressive strengths. GP1 (fly ash–slag) developed visible cracking and experienced reductions of 23.4% and 17.8% in compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, respectively, whereas GP2 (fly ash) remained mechanically stable. MIP revealed substantial pore structure differences. GP1 exhibited a finer pore structure (∼7 nm dominant pore size), while cross-sectional observations revealed numerous entrapped air voids uncaptured by MIP. The results indicate that conventional parameters such as compressive strength, absorption capacity, and accessible porosity alone were insufficient to explain the observed pressure response. Building on these observations, a conceptual pressure-equalization mechanism is proposed: materials facilitating pressure transmission throughout an interconnected pore network accommodate prolonged hydrostatic loading, whereas hindered pressure equalization—caused by fine pore structures and isolated internal voids—leads to localized stress concentrations and mechanical deterioration.
孔隙结构特征对胶凝材料高压力学响应的影响
深海基础设施需要能够承受高静水压力的胶凝材料。然而,控制压力损伤的机制,特别是孔隙结构特征的作用,仍然没有得到充分的了解。本研究考察了opc基砂浆和地聚合物基砂浆在45 MPa水压下22 h的反应。通过力学性能、吸水特性、压汞孔隙度(MIP)和微观结构观察来评估压力引起的变化。在OPC基砂浆中,OPC、FA20(替换20%粉煤灰)和S60(替换60%矿渣)在压力暴露后的抗压强度变化较小,变化幅度在±3%以内。相比之下,带气混合物的吸收能力和可达孔隙率均增加了约19%,同时伴有适度的机械降解。尽管初始抗压强度相当,但地聚合物体系表现出明显不同的行为。GP1(粉煤灰-矿渣)出现明显的开裂,抗压强度和弹性模量分别下降23.4%和17.8%,而GP2(粉煤灰)保持机械稳定。MIP显示了明显的孔隙结构差异。GP1表现出更精细的孔隙结构(~ 7 nm的主要孔径),而横断面观察显示MIP未捕获许多被捕获的空气空隙。结果表明,常规参数如抗压强度、吸收能力和可达孔隙度不足以解释观察到的压力响应。基于这些观察,我们提出了一种概念性的压力均衡机制:有利于压力在相互连接的孔隙网络中传递的材料可以适应长时间的静水载荷,而由细孔隙结构和孤立的内部空隙引起的压力均衡受阻会导致局部应力集中和机械退化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书