Implementation of a patient-reported outcome measure based digital journey and automation tool: A feasibility study in a surgical setting.

Diana Castro Paupério, Filipe Freitas Pinto, Ana Dionísio, Henrique Coelho, Serafim Guimarães, Tomaz Crochemore, Donat R Spahn, Joana Berger-Estilita, João Firmino-Machado
{"title":"Implementation of a patient-reported outcome measure based digital journey and automation tool: A feasibility study in a surgical setting.","authors":"Diana Castro Paupério, Filipe Freitas Pinto, Ana Dionísio, Henrique Coelho, Serafim Guimarães, Tomaz Crochemore, Donat R Spahn, Joana Berger-Estilita, João Firmino-Machado","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient blood management (PBM) has been shown to improve patient outcomes and optimise resource use. However, the systematic collection and analysis of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains challenging, limiting their integration into PBM pathways and into value-based healthcare (VBHC) strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and adherence to an automated VBHC digital tool for PROMs collection in a population of cardiac surgical patients, within the context of PBM implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre, pragmatic, prospective feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary Portuguese hospital considering data from 1 March to 6 September 2024. A total of 12 professionals were actively involved in the patient journey design.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 221 patients (65.2% men, mean age 66.7 ± 9.9 years) with a scheduled cardiothoracic surgery were included.Main outcome measures: Percentage of planned interactions successfully completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-phase digital PROMs journey was implemented in less than 2 months. A total of 638 interactions were completed by 221 patients, resulting in a global completion proportion of 72.1%. 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) and BPI questionnaires, completed by 77% of patients, results at 90 days compared to results at initial evaluation (SF-36 physical: t = -0.424, <i>P</i> = 0.681; mental: Z = 33.0, <i>P</i> = 1.000; Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity and Interference: Z = 23.0, <i>P</i> = 0.646). The PHQ-9, completed by 76% of patients, identified five severe and nine moderately severe depression cases. Educational content had a 73.9% reading completion proportion across 303 views.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We showed the feasibility of implementing a digital tool to monitor patient PROMs, along with its adoption by patients and health professionals. This strategy has the potential to contribute to improving healthcare professionals' motivation, access to real-world data, personalised monitoring, and allowing for faster implementation of corrective actions, with an impact on patients' outcomes and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13568202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient blood management (PBM) has been shown to improve patient outcomes and optimise resource use. However, the systematic collection and analysis of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains challenging, limiting their integration into PBM pathways and into value-based healthcare (VBHC) strategies.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and adherence to an automated VBHC digital tool for PROMs collection in a population of cardiac surgical patients, within the context of PBM implementation.

Design: A single-centre, pragmatic, prospective feasibility study.

Setting: A tertiary Portuguese hospital considering data from 1 March to 6 September 2024. A total of 12 professionals were actively involved in the patient journey design.

Patients: A total of 221 patients (65.2% men, mean age 66.7 ± 9.9 years) with a scheduled cardiothoracic surgery were included.Main outcome measures: Percentage of planned interactions successfully completed.

Results: A two-phase digital PROMs journey was implemented in less than 2 months. A total of 638 interactions were completed by 221 patients, resulting in a global completion proportion of 72.1%. 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) and BPI questionnaires, completed by 77% of patients, results at 90 days compared to results at initial evaluation (SF-36 physical: t = -0.424, P = 0.681; mental: Z = 33.0, P = 1.000; Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity and Interference: Z = 23.0, P = 0.646). The PHQ-9, completed by 76% of patients, identified five severe and nine moderately severe depression cases. Educational content had a 73.9% reading completion proportion across 303 views.

Conclusions: We showed the feasibility of implementing a digital tool to monitor patient PROMs, along with its adoption by patients and health professionals. This strategy has the potential to contribute to improving healthcare professionals' motivation, access to real-world data, personalised monitoring, and allowing for faster implementation of corrective actions, with an impact on patients' outcomes and costs.

基于数字旅程和自动化工具的患者报告结果测量的实施:外科环境中的可行性研究。
背景:患者血液管理(PBM)已被证明可以改善患者预后并优化资源利用。然而,系统地收集和分析患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)仍然具有挑战性,限制了它们与PBM途径和基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)战略的整合。目的:本研究旨在评估在PBM实施的背景下,在心脏外科患者中使用自动VBHC数字工具收集PROMs的可行性和依从性。设计:单中心、务实、前瞻性可行性研究。环境:考虑到2024年3月1日至9月6日的数据,一家葡萄牙三级医院。共有12名专业人员积极参与了患者旅程的设计。患者:共纳入221例患者(65.2%为男性,平均年龄66.7±9.9岁),均计划进行心胸外科手术。主要结果度量:成功完成计划交互的百分比。结果:在不到2个月的时间内完成了两阶段的数字prom旅程。221名患者共完成638次互动,全球完成比例为72.1%。由77%的患者完成36项简短问卷调查(SF-36)和BPI问卷,90天的结果与初始评估结果比较(SF-36身体:t = -0.424, P = 0.681;精神:Z = 33.0, P = 1.000;简短疼痛量表(BPI)疼痛严重程度和干扰:Z = 23.0, P = 0.646)。76%的患者完成了PHQ-9,确定了5例重度抑郁症和9例中度抑郁症。303次浏览中,教育类内容的阅读完成率为73.9%。结论:我们展示了实施数字工具来监测患者PROMs的可行性,以及患者和卫生专业人员对其的采用。该策略有可能有助于提高医疗保健专业人员的积极性,访问真实数据,进行个性化监控,并允许更快地实施纠正措施,从而对患者的治疗结果和成本产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书