One-week changes on the Independent Living Scales in older adults: Proof of concept for quantifying subtle functional decline.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lakshmi Kannan, Kevin Duff
{"title":"One-week changes on the Independent Living Scales in older adults: Proof of concept for quantifying subtle functional decline.","authors":"Lakshmi Kannan, Kevin Duff","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2026.2730448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Identifying subtle change in daily functioning is important for diagnosing late life cognitive disorders. This proof-of-concept study sought to develop standardized regression-based (SRB) equations for the Independent Living Scales (ILS) and examine their application in older adults over one week to quantify subtle functional changes. <b>Method:</b> Two hundred sixteen older adults (86% cognitively unimpaired, 14% cognitively impaired) were administered the ILS, a multi-dimensional standardized measure of daily functioning, during a baseline visit and one week later. In the unimpaired participants, linear regression models predicted one-week ILS scores by baseline ILS scores, demographics, retest intervals, and premorbid intellect. SRB equations were applied to both groups and compared with independent t-tests and chi-square tests. <b>Results:</b> One-week retest scores were significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) predicted in the unimpaired individuals, with regression models accounting for 14-51% of the variance. As expected, SRB-derived <i>z</i>-scores differed significantly between groups, with the impaired group demonstrating more negative values for the ILS Full Scale (<i>p =</i> 0.03) and 2 of 5 subscales (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002). Chi-square analyses revealed that smaller-than-expected retest performance was overrepresented in impaired participants (e.g. ILS Full Scale: impaired = 30%, unimpaired = 5%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Using SRB methodology, change scores on the ILS across one week were developed and showed expected group differences. These change scores, which correct for practice effects and expected variability across one week, have the potential to identify subtle functional decline in those at risk for dementia. Future research could expand this methodology to other functional scales across longer retest intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2730448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identifying subtle change in daily functioning is important for diagnosing late life cognitive disorders. This proof-of-concept study sought to develop standardized regression-based (SRB) equations for the Independent Living Scales (ILS) and examine their application in older adults over one week to quantify subtle functional changes. Method: Two hundred sixteen older adults (86% cognitively unimpaired, 14% cognitively impaired) were administered the ILS, a multi-dimensional standardized measure of daily functioning, during a baseline visit and one week later. In the unimpaired participants, linear regression models predicted one-week ILS scores by baseline ILS scores, demographics, retest intervals, and premorbid intellect. SRB equations were applied to both groups and compared with independent t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: One-week retest scores were significantly (p < 0.001) predicted in the unimpaired individuals, with regression models accounting for 14-51% of the variance. As expected, SRB-derived z-scores differed significantly between groups, with the impaired group demonstrating more negative values for the ILS Full Scale (p = 0.03) and 2 of 5 subscales (p ≤ 0.002). Chi-square analyses revealed that smaller-than-expected retest performance was overrepresented in impaired participants (e.g. ILS Full Scale: impaired = 30%, unimpaired = 5%). Conclusion: Using SRB methodology, change scores on the ILS across one week were developed and showed expected group differences. These change scores, which correct for practice effects and expected variability across one week, have the potential to identify subtle functional decline in those at risk for dementia. Future research could expand this methodology to other functional scales across longer retest intervals.

老年人独立生活量表的一周变化:量化细微功能衰退的概念证明。
目的:识别日常功能的细微变化对诊断晚期认知障碍具有重要意义。这项概念验证研究旨在为独立生活量表(ILS)开发基于标准化回归(SRB)的方程,并检查其在老年人中超过一周的应用,以量化细微的功能变化。方法:216名老年人(86%认知未受损,14%认知受损)在基线访问期间和一周后接受ILS,这是一种多维标准化的日常功能测量。在未受损的参与者中,线性回归模型通过基线ILS分数、人口统计学、复测间隔和病前智力来预测一周的ILS分数。两组采用SRB方程,分别采用独立t检验和卡方检验进行比较。结果:1周重测得分组间差异有统计学意义(p - z-score组间差异有统计学意义),受损组在ILS全量表(p = 0.03)和5个子量表中的2个(p≤0.002)上出现更多的负值。卡方分析显示,受损参与者的重测表现低于预期(例如,ILS全量表:受损= 30%,未受损= 5%)。结论:采用SRB方法,制定了一周内ILS的变化评分,并显示出预期的组差异。这些变化分数校正了一周内的练习效果和预期变化,有可能识别出那些有痴呆症风险的人的细微功能下降。未来的研究可以将这种方法扩展到更长的重测间隔的其他功能量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书