Social determinants of health, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization in participants with and without narcolepsy in the All of Us research program.

Sarah C Markt, Caroleen Drachenberg, Anan Zhou, Katarina Irwin, Silky Beaty, Jon Michael Stroh, Martin Zagari, Jessica K Alexander, Marisa Whalen, Junko Saber, Barbara Hutchinson
{"title":"Social determinants of health, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization in participants with and without narcolepsy in the <i>All of Us</i> research program.","authors":"Sarah C Markt, Caroleen Drachenberg, Anan Zhou, Katarina Irwin, Silky Beaty, Jon Michael Stroh, Martin Zagari, Jessica K Alexander, Marisa Whalen, Junko Saber, Barbara Hutchinson","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Evaluate the clinical and economic burden and impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) in narcolepsy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study used electronic health record and survey data from the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program (1/1/2009-7/31/2022). Participants with narcolepsy were matched 1:3 to participants without narcolepsy. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses (odds ratios [ORs]) summarized demographics, clinical comorbidities, and SDoH; hazard ratios (HRs) estimated risk of incident hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and coronary arteriosclerosis (CA); and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) estimated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 2766 participants (narcolepsy, <i>n</i> = 694; non-narcolepsy, <i>n</i> = 2072; mean age, 49 years; 70 per cent female). Despite high education levels, greater proportions were out of work/the workforce in the narcolepsy versus non-narcolepsy cohort (38.5 per cent vs. 29.2 per cent). Among SDoH survey respondents, greater food insecurity, loneliness, and everyday/medical discrimination, and less social support/cohesion were reported in the narcolepsy (<i>n</i> = 259) versus non-narcolepsy (<i>n</i> = 768) cohort. Individuals with versus without narcolepsy had higher odds (OR [95 per cent confidence interval; CI]) of cardiovascular (1.76 [1.35-2.28]), cardiometabolic (2.12 [1.73-2.59]), and renal (2.47 [1.72-3.56]) comorbidities; higher risk (HR [95 per cent CI]) of developing hypertension (2.00 [1.51-2.65]), hyperlipidemia (1.96 [1.52-2.54]), obesity (2.42 [1.93-3.05]), and CA (1.75 [1.27-2.42]); and increased HCRU (IRR [95 per cent CI]) for inpatient days (2.07 [1.55-2.78]), outpatient visits (1.51 [1.35-1.70]), and emergency department visits (1.70 [1.19-2.43]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Narcolepsy is associated with employment barriers, SDoH-related disparities, and elevated comorbidity burden and risk. Comprehensive and timely management strategies are needed to address whole-person health.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"7 3","pages":"zpag088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13570643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Evaluate the clinical and economic burden and impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) in narcolepsy.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, observational study used electronic health record and survey data from the All of Us Research Program (1/1/2009-7/31/2022). Participants with narcolepsy were matched 1:3 to participants without narcolepsy. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses (odds ratios [ORs]) summarized demographics, clinical comorbidities, and SDoH; hazard ratios (HRs) estimated risk of incident hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and coronary arteriosclerosis (CA); and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) estimated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU).

Results: The sample comprised 2766 participants (narcolepsy, n = 694; non-narcolepsy, n = 2072; mean age, 49 years; 70 per cent female). Despite high education levels, greater proportions were out of work/the workforce in the narcolepsy versus non-narcolepsy cohort (38.5 per cent vs. 29.2 per cent). Among SDoH survey respondents, greater food insecurity, loneliness, and everyday/medical discrimination, and less social support/cohesion were reported in the narcolepsy (n = 259) versus non-narcolepsy (n = 768) cohort. Individuals with versus without narcolepsy had higher odds (OR [95 per cent confidence interval; CI]) of cardiovascular (1.76 [1.35-2.28]), cardiometabolic (2.12 [1.73-2.59]), and renal (2.47 [1.72-3.56]) comorbidities; higher risk (HR [95 per cent CI]) of developing hypertension (2.00 [1.51-2.65]), hyperlipidemia (1.96 [1.52-2.54]), obesity (2.42 [1.93-3.05]), and CA (1.75 [1.27-2.42]); and increased HCRU (IRR [95 per cent CI]) for inpatient days (2.07 [1.55-2.78]), outpatient visits (1.51 [1.35-1.70]), and emergency department visits (1.70 [1.19-2.43]).

Conclusions: Narcolepsy is associated with employment barriers, SDoH-related disparities, and elevated comorbidity burden and risk. Comprehensive and timely management strategies are needed to address whole-person health.

在All of Us研究项目中,有和没有发作性睡病的参与者的健康、临床结果和医疗资源利用的社会决定因素
研究目的:评估发作性睡病患者的临床和经济负担以及社会健康决定因素(SDoH)的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性观察性研究使用电子健康记录和我们所有人研究计划(2009年1月1日- 2022年7月31日)的调查数据。嗜睡症患者与非嗜睡症患者的比例为1:3。描述性统计和回归分析(比值比[ORs])总结了人口统计学、临床合并症和SDoH;风险比(hr)估计发生高血压、高脂血症、肥胖和冠状动脉硬化(CA)的风险;发病率比(IRRs)估计医疗资源利用率(HCRU)。结果:样本包括2766名参与者(嗜睡症患者,n = 694;非嗜睡症患者,n = 2072;平均年龄49岁;70%为女性)。尽管受教育程度较高,但与非发作性睡病人群相比,发作性睡病患者失业/劳动力的比例更高(38.5%对29.2%)。在SDoH调查受访者中,发作性睡病(n = 259)与非发作性睡病(n = 768)相比,报告了更大的食物不安全、孤独感和日常/医疗歧视,以及更少的社会支持/凝聚力。发作性睡病患者与非发作性睡病患者相比,心血管(1.76[1.35-2.28])、心脏代谢(2.12[1.73-2.59])和肾脏(2.47[1.72-3.56])合并症的发生率更高(OR[95%可信区间;CI]);发生高血压(2.00[1.51-2.65])、高脂血症(1.96[1.52-2.54])、肥胖(2.42[1.93-3.05])和CA(1.75[1.27-2.42])的风险较高(HR [95% CI]);住院天数(2.07[1.55-2.78])、门诊次数(1.51[1.35-1.70])和急诊科次数(1.70[1.19-2.43])的HCRU (IRR [95% CI])增加。结论:发作性睡病与就业障碍、sdoh相关差异、合并症负担和风险升高有关。需要全面和及时的管理战略来解决全人健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书