A tool to maximize air quality co-benefits while planning local climate actions: application to the Covenant of Mayors initiative.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2026-05-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.22919.1
Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Luana Valentini, Joana Bastos, Marta Giulia Baldi, Enrico Pisoni
{"title":"A tool to maximize air quality co-benefits while planning local climate actions: application to the Covenant of Mayors initiative.","authors":"Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Luana Valentini, Joana Bastos, Marta Giulia Baldi, Enrico Pisoni","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.22919.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a novel tool to quantify potential air quality co-benefits of local climate action and an analysis applying it to a large sample of cities across European and neighbouring countries. The tool estimates the effects of local actions tackling greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with two sectors, namely residential buildings and transport, on air quality. It estimates emission changes associated with GHG mitigation actions described in city climate action plans (CAPs) for five key air pollutants, namely fine particulate matter (PM <sub>2.5</sub>), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur dioxide (SO <sub>2</sub>), ammonia (NH <sub>3</sub>) and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The analysis applies the tool to evaluate potential impacts of local climate action for 494 cities on ambient air pollutant emissions, based on 531 CAPs submitted to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy (CoM) initiative. The results demonstrate that GHG mitigation actions are often synergic with air pollution control strategies, offering significant air quality co-benefits. The magnitude and type of benefits depend on the sector and pollutant considered. Nevertheless, some actions may pose risks for air quality. There are risks of increasing, for example, ammonia emissions through a transport fuel switch and, more significantly, fine particulate matter emissions if solid biomass for heating in the residential sector is promoted. Therefore, context-specific data and case-by-case tailored analyses are needed to support the adequate integration of GHG mitigation and air quality policies at city level, avoiding potential trade-offs and maximizing synergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"6 ","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.22919.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a novel tool to quantify potential air quality co-benefits of local climate action and an analysis applying it to a large sample of cities across European and neighbouring countries. The tool estimates the effects of local actions tackling greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with two sectors, namely residential buildings and transport, on air quality. It estimates emission changes associated with GHG mitigation actions described in city climate action plans (CAPs) for five key air pollutants, namely fine particulate matter (PM 2.5), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur dioxide (SO 2), ammonia (NH 3) and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The analysis applies the tool to evaluate potential impacts of local climate action for 494 cities on ambient air pollutant emissions, based on 531 CAPs submitted to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy (CoM) initiative. The results demonstrate that GHG mitigation actions are often synergic with air pollution control strategies, offering significant air quality co-benefits. The magnitude and type of benefits depend on the sector and pollutant considered. Nevertheless, some actions may pose risks for air quality. There are risks of increasing, for example, ammonia emissions through a transport fuel switch and, more significantly, fine particulate matter emissions if solid biomass for heating in the residential sector is promoted. Therefore, context-specific data and case-by-case tailored analyses are needed to support the adequate integration of GHG mitigation and air quality policies at city level, avoiding potential trade-offs and maximizing synergies.

在规划地方气候行动时最大限度地提高空气质量协同效益的工具:适用于《市长公约》倡议。
本文提出了一种新的工具来量化当地气候行动的潜在空气质量协同效益,并将其应用于欧洲和邻国的大量城市样本进行分析。该工具估计了解决与住宅建筑和交通运输两个部门相关的温室气体排放的地方行动对空气质量的影响。它估计了与城市气候行动计划(cap)中描述的五种主要空气污染物的温室气体减缓行动相关的排放变化,即细颗粒物(PM 2.5)、氮氧化物(NOx)、二氧化硫(so2)、氨(nh3)和挥发性有机化合物(VOC)。该分析基于提交给市长气候与能源公约(CoM)倡议的531个cap,应用该工具评估了494个城市的地方气候行动对环境空气污染物排放的潜在影响。结果表明,温室气体减缓行动往往与空气污染控制战略协同作用,提供显著的空气质量协同效益。效益的大小和类型取决于所考虑的部门和污染物。然而,有些行动可能会对空气质量构成风险。例如,由于运输燃料的转换,有增加氨排放的风险,更重要的是,如果在住宅部门推广用于供暖的固体生物质,则有增加细颗粒物排放的风险。因此,需要针对具体情况的数据和针对具体情况的分析,以支持在城市一级充分整合温室气体缓解和空气质量政策,避免潜在的权衡,并最大限度地发挥协同效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书