Operationalising ethics in the EHDS: Tools, principles, and governance mechanisms.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2026-06-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.23447.1
Kristina Weishäupl, Beatriz Jacinto Barros, Lisa Ferent, Anne Sofie Skødt Jørgensen, Alexander Leander Knudsen
{"title":"Operationalising ethics in the EHDS: Tools, principles, and governance mechanisms.","authors":"Kristina Weishäupl, Beatriz Jacinto Barros, Lisa Ferent, Anne Sofie Skødt Jørgensen, Alexander Leander Knudsen","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.23447.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Health Data Space (EHDS) offers significant opportunities for the secondary use of health data to support research, innovation, and public health across Europe. However, it introduces complex ethical governance challenges. While the EHDS Regulation requires data access applications to address ethical considerations, it does not establish a uniform EU-level ethics review pathway, leaving oversight largely to national law and institutional competence. This variability risks fragmentation, procedural inconsistency, and barriers to cross-border data access. This article presents recommendations for operationalising ethical governance under the EHDS, informed by an EU-wide, multi-stakeholder workshop conducted under the TEHDAS2 Joint Action. Insights were analysed thematically in relation to the EHDS user journey and relevant governance frameworks, yielding recommendations across three interconnected areas: First, harmonisation with national flexibility calls for shared minimum ethical standards and a voluntary common ethics reference framework to support consistent assessments without constraining national autonomy. Standardised documentation and mutual recognition agreements can further reduce duplication while facilitating cross-border secondary use. Second, building public trust, security, and transparency require making ethical governance visible and intelligible through accessible summaries of approved data uses, clear communication on data security safeguards, and inclusive citizen engagement. Healthcare professionals are identified as key trusted intermediaries whose informed involvement can reinforce confidence in the system. Third, building capacity and expertise for ethical assessment emphasises the need for interdisciplinary skills spanning bioethics, artificial intelligence ethics, data protection, and health informatics within Health Data Access Bodies and ethics committees. EU-supported knowledge exchange, mentorship schemes, and shared digital platforms can help mitigate disparities across Member States. Together, these recommendations offer a practical roadmap for policymakers, Health Data Access Bodies, and stakeholders to establish ethical governance that is coherent, transparent, and oriented toward the collective public good as the EHDS becomes operational.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"6 ","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.23447.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Health Data Space (EHDS) offers significant opportunities for the secondary use of health data to support research, innovation, and public health across Europe. However, it introduces complex ethical governance challenges. While the EHDS Regulation requires data access applications to address ethical considerations, it does not establish a uniform EU-level ethics review pathway, leaving oversight largely to national law and institutional competence. This variability risks fragmentation, procedural inconsistency, and barriers to cross-border data access. This article presents recommendations for operationalising ethical governance under the EHDS, informed by an EU-wide, multi-stakeholder workshop conducted under the TEHDAS2 Joint Action. Insights were analysed thematically in relation to the EHDS user journey and relevant governance frameworks, yielding recommendations across three interconnected areas: First, harmonisation with national flexibility calls for shared minimum ethical standards and a voluntary common ethics reference framework to support consistent assessments without constraining national autonomy. Standardised documentation and mutual recognition agreements can further reduce duplication while facilitating cross-border secondary use. Second, building public trust, security, and transparency require making ethical governance visible and intelligible through accessible summaries of approved data uses, clear communication on data security safeguards, and inclusive citizen engagement. Healthcare professionals are identified as key trusted intermediaries whose informed involvement can reinforce confidence in the system. Third, building capacity and expertise for ethical assessment emphasises the need for interdisciplinary skills spanning bioethics, artificial intelligence ethics, data protection, and health informatics within Health Data Access Bodies and ethics committees. EU-supported knowledge exchange, mentorship schemes, and shared digital platforms can help mitigate disparities across Member States. Together, these recommendations offer a practical roadmap for policymakers, Health Data Access Bodies, and stakeholders to establish ethical governance that is coherent, transparent, and oriented toward the collective public good as the EHDS becomes operational.

在EHDS中实施道德规范:工具、原则和治理机制。
欧洲卫生数据空间(EHDS)为卫生数据的二次使用提供了重要的机会,以支持整个欧洲的研究、创新和公共卫生。然而,它带来了复杂的道德治理挑战。虽然EHDS法规要求数据访问应用程序解决伦理问题,但它并没有建立统一的欧盟层面的伦理审查途径,将监督主要留给国家法律和机构能力。这种可变性会带来碎片化、程序不一致和跨界数据访问障碍的风险。本文提出了在EHDS下实施道德治理的建议,这些建议是由在TEHDAS2联合行动下进行的欧盟范围内的多方利益相关者研讨会提供的。对EHDS用户旅程和相关治理框架的见解进行了专题分析,在三个相互关联的领域提出了建议:首先,与国家灵活性的协调要求共享最低道德标准和自愿的共同道德参考框架,以支持一致的评估,而不限制国家自主权。标准化文件和相互承认协议可以进一步减少重复,同时促进跨境二次使用。其次,建立公众信任、安全和透明度需要通过可访问的已批准数据使用摘要、数据安全保障方面的明确沟通以及包容性的公民参与,使道德治理可见且易于理解。医疗保健专业人员被认为是关键的可信中介,他们的知情参与可以增强对系统的信心。第三,伦理评估能力和专业知识的建设强调了在卫生数据获取机构和伦理委员会内需要跨学科技能,包括生物伦理学、人工智能伦理学、数据保护和卫生信息学。欧盟支持的知识交流、指导计划和共享数字平台可以帮助减轻成员国之间的差距。这些建议共同为政策制定者、卫生数据访问机构和利益相关者提供了一个实用的路线图,以便在EHDS开始运作时建立连贯、透明并以集体公共利益为导向的道德治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书