{"title":"Oral antibiotics prescribing patterns and associated diarrhea risk: Public health implications.","authors":"Zorica Naumovska, Emilija Atanasovska, Beti Djurdjic, Kristina Mladenovska, Tanja Petreska Ivanovska, Nikola Geskovski, Katerina Anceska Netkovska, Katerina Goracinova, Renata Slaveska Raichki, Dushko Shalabalija, Ljubica Mihailova, Teodora Tasevska, Lina Livrinska Trpeska, Maja Simonoska Crcarevska","doi":"10.1177/22799036261480287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug reactions (ADR), including antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD), underscoring the importance of WHO AWaRe recommendations for rational prescribing. Clinical evidence supports the use of specific probiotic strains to reduce AAD risk, with strain-specific recommendations that should be adapted to regional contexts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess oral antibiotic consumption in the Republic of North Macedonia (2011-2022), evaluate prescribing patterns according to the WHO AWaRe classification, identify antibiotics associated with a higher burden of AAD, and determine the availability of evidence-supported probiotics for AAD prevention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational pharmaco-epidemiological study integrating antibiotic utilization data, pharmacovigilance signals, and evidence synthesis from systematic reviews and market analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reimbursed oral antibiotic data (ATC J01) were obtained from the National Health Insurance Fund. Gastrointestinal ADR reports were extracted from EudraVigilance and FAERS. Diarrhea risk was estimated using SmPC frequency categories and normalized pharmacovigilance indicators. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used to identify probiotic strains with evidence for AAD prevention, and online pharmacy surveys assessed market availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Penicillins and cephalosporins predominated in antibiotic use. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefixime, and clindamycin ranked highest for diarrhea risk based on combined utilization and pharmacovigilance indicators. Saccharomyces boulardii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG showed the strongest evidence for AAD prevention. Considerable variability was observed in probiotic product composition and reporting across the market.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight antibiotics with higher AAD-related public health burden and support antimicrobial stewardship strategies, including evidence-based probiotic co-administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"22799036261480287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13570092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036261480287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug reactions (ADR), including antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD), underscoring the importance of WHO AWaRe recommendations for rational prescribing. Clinical evidence supports the use of specific probiotic strains to reduce AAD risk, with strain-specific recommendations that should be adapted to regional contexts.
Objectives: To assess oral antibiotic consumption in the Republic of North Macedonia (2011-2022), evaluate prescribing patterns according to the WHO AWaRe classification, identify antibiotics associated with a higher burden of AAD, and determine the availability of evidence-supported probiotics for AAD prevention.
Design: Observational pharmaco-epidemiological study integrating antibiotic utilization data, pharmacovigilance signals, and evidence synthesis from systematic reviews and market analysis.
Methods: Reimbursed oral antibiotic data (ATC J01) were obtained from the National Health Insurance Fund. Gastrointestinal ADR reports were extracted from EudraVigilance and FAERS. Diarrhea risk was estimated using SmPC frequency categories and normalized pharmacovigilance indicators. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used to identify probiotic strains with evidence for AAD prevention, and online pharmacy surveys assessed market availability.
Results: Penicillins and cephalosporins predominated in antibiotic use. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefixime, and clindamycin ranked highest for diarrhea risk based on combined utilization and pharmacovigilance indicators. Saccharomyces boulardii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG showed the strongest evidence for AAD prevention. Considerable variability was observed in probiotic product composition and reporting across the market.
Conclusion: Findings highlight antibiotics with higher AAD-related public health burden and support antimicrobial stewardship strategies, including evidence-based probiotic co-administration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.