Fetal aortic morphometry by echocardiography: reproducibility study using stringent criteria and standardized nomenclature.

IF 6.3
P Vazirani, L Nogué, A Fernández, M Pérez, M Guilleumes, E Cabello, A Sepúlveda-Martínez, M C Escobar-Díaz, G Bernardino, B Bijnens, F Crispi, O Gómez
{"title":"Fetal aortic morphometry by echocardiography: reproducibility study using stringent criteria and standardized nomenclature.","authors":"P Vazirani, L Nogué, A Fernández, M Pérez, M Guilleumes, E Cabello, A Sepúlveda-Martínez, M C Escobar-Díaz, G Bernardino, B Bijnens, F Crispi, O Gómez","doi":"10.1002/uog.70329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish and assess the reproducibility of standardized echocardiographic nomenclature and the protocol for comprehensive evaluation of fetal aortic morphology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of fetuses with a normal three-vessel branching pattern of the aortic arch, evaluated from 18-40 weeks' gestation at a single center between January 2024 and November 2024. Alongside standard two-dimensional views, four-dimensional spatiotemporal image correlation cardiac volumes were acquired to establish the correspondence between the longitudinal aortic-arch view and the three-vessel-and-trachea (3VT) view. A comprehensive nomenclature, based on clear anatomical landmarks, and stringent measurement protocol were defined for fetal aortic dimensions and angles measured in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), the longitudinal aortic-arch and the 3VT echocardiographic views. Measurements were performed independently by two observers, with a repeat analysis by a single observer, to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility, respectively, using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 singleton fetuses with normal three-vessel branching were randomly selected to comprise the study population. Parameters measured in the LVOT view demonstrated good-to-excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (ICC > 0.8), with excellent reproducibility observed for the sinotubular junction and mid-ascending aorta diameters (except the interobserver reproducibility for mid-ascending aorta diameter (ICC, 0.883 (95% CI, 0.739-0.945)), which was good). Good-to-excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.8-0.9) was also demonstrated for longitudinal aortic-arch diameters and distances between supra-aortic vessels, whereas the ascending-to-descending aorta angle showed moderate intra- and interobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.652 (95% CI, 0.435-0.798) and 0.593 (95% CI, 0.199-0.776), respectively). In the 3VT view, the standardized aortic diameters and the 3VT angle had good-to-excellent intraobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.75-0.9). There was also good agreement between the aortic isthmus diameter in the longitudinal aortic-arch view and the 3VT view (ICC, 0.870 (95% CI, 0.458-0.995); P < 0.001). No significant differences or systematic bias were found between observers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A standardized echocardiographic protocol with uniform nomenclature and anatomical landmarks would enable reliable and reproducible fetal aortic morphometry across multiple echocardiographic views, and would be a significant step towards harmonizing fetal aorta imaging, enabling meaningful comparisons across studies and promoting collaborative research. © 2026 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":520822,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"540-549"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish and assess the reproducibility of standardized echocardiographic nomenclature and the protocol for comprehensive evaluation of fetal aortic morphology.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of fetuses with a normal three-vessel branching pattern of the aortic arch, evaluated from 18-40 weeks' gestation at a single center between January 2024 and November 2024. Alongside standard two-dimensional views, four-dimensional spatiotemporal image correlation cardiac volumes were acquired to establish the correspondence between the longitudinal aortic-arch view and the three-vessel-and-trachea (3VT) view. A comprehensive nomenclature, based on clear anatomical landmarks, and stringent measurement protocol were defined for fetal aortic dimensions and angles measured in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), the longitudinal aortic-arch and the 3VT echocardiographic views. Measurements were performed independently by two observers, with a repeat analysis by a single observer, to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility, respectively, using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: A total of 45 singleton fetuses with normal three-vessel branching were randomly selected to comprise the study population. Parameters measured in the LVOT view demonstrated good-to-excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (ICC > 0.8), with excellent reproducibility observed for the sinotubular junction and mid-ascending aorta diameters (except the interobserver reproducibility for mid-ascending aorta diameter (ICC, 0.883 (95% CI, 0.739-0.945)), which was good). Good-to-excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.8-0.9) was also demonstrated for longitudinal aortic-arch diameters and distances between supra-aortic vessels, whereas the ascending-to-descending aorta angle showed moderate intra- and interobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.652 (95% CI, 0.435-0.798) and 0.593 (95% CI, 0.199-0.776), respectively). In the 3VT view, the standardized aortic diameters and the 3VT angle had good-to-excellent intraobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.75-0.9). There was also good agreement between the aortic isthmus diameter in the longitudinal aortic-arch view and the 3VT view (ICC, 0.870 (95% CI, 0.458-0.995); P < 0.001). No significant differences or systematic bias were found between observers.

Conclusion: A standardized echocardiographic protocol with uniform nomenclature and anatomical landmarks would enable reliable and reproducible fetal aortic morphometry across multiple echocardiographic views, and would be a significant step towards harmonizing fetal aorta imaging, enabling meaningful comparisons across studies and promoting collaborative research. © 2026 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

超声心动图胎儿主动脉形态测定:使用严格标准和标准化命名法的可重复性研究。
目的:建立并评价超声心动图标准化命名法及胎儿主动脉形态综合评价方案的可重复性。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,在2024年1月至2024年11月期间,对妊娠18-40周的主动脉弓正常三支型胎儿进行评估。除了标准的二维图像外,还获得了四维时空图像相关心脏容积,以建立纵向主动脉弓视图与三血管-气管(3VT)视图之间的对应关系。在左心室流出道(LVOT)、纵主动脉弓和3VT超声心动图上测量胎儿主动脉的尺寸和角度,根据明确的解剖标志和严格的测量方案,定义了一个全面的命名法。测量由两名观察者独立进行,由一名观察者进行重复分析,分别使用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估观察者内部和观察者之间的可重复性。结果:随机选择45例三支正常的单胎胎儿作为研究对象。LVOT视图中测量的参数显示出良好的观察者内部和观察者之间的可重复性(ICC > 0.8),其中观察到的窦管连接处和中升主动脉直径的可重复性非常好(除了中升主动脉直径的观察者之间的可重复性(ICC, 0.883 (95% CI, 0.739-0.945),这是良好的)。纵主动脉弓直径和主动脉上血管之间的距离也显示出良好到优异的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性(ICC, 0.8-0.9),而升降主动脉角度显示出中等的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性(ICC, 0.652 (95% CI, 0.435-0.798)和0.593 (95% CI, 0.199-0.776)。在3VT视图中,标准化主动脉直径和3VT角度具有良好到优异的观察者内再现性(ICC, 0.75-0.9)。纵弓位和3VT位的主动脉峡部直径也有很好的一致性(ICC, 0.870 (95% CI, 0.458-0.995);结论:具有统一命名法和解剖标志的标准化超声心动图方案将在多个超声心动图视图中实现可靠和可重复的胎儿主动脉形态测量,并将是协调胎儿主动脉成像的重要一步,使研究之间能够进行有意义的比较,并促进合作研究。©2026作者。妇产科学超声由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科学超声学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书