The Truth Lies Within the Gap.

Q2 Medicine
Shaun Tan, Alex Yong, Sharon Saw, Sunil Sethi
{"title":"The Truth Lies Within the Gap.","authors":"Shaun Tan, Alex Yong, Sharon Saw, Sunil Sethi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report a case in which a post-analytical transcription error in serum osmolality led to diagnostic delay and unnecessary investigations in a patient with hyponatremia. The principal learning point of this case is that discrepancy between measured and calculated osmolality-the osmolal gap-was critical to detecting the error and redirecting the diagnostic evaluation. A 68-year-old female with a past medical history of hyperlipidemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, was scheduled for inpatient open reduction and internal fixation of a right distal radius fracture under the Hand surgery service. She was referred to the endocrinologists in view of persistent hyponatremia. Pre-operatively, her serum sodium was 128mmol/L (reference interval 135-145mmol/L), potassium was 4.2mmol/L (3.5-5mmol/L), urea was 4.8mmol/L (2.0-6.5mmol/L), random glucose was 5.2mmol/L (4.0-7.8mmol/L) and measured osmolality was 296 mOsm/Kg (275-300 mOsm/Kg). Records of her previous serum sodium trend were reviewed, and all were within the normal reference interval since 2011. In this case, the serum osmolality was within our laboratory's normal reference interval albeit at the higher end at 296 mOsm/Kg. The initial clinical impression at this point of time was thus normo-osmolar pseudohyponatremia. The clinical pathologist's opinion was requested, and the patient's serum sodium was further evaluated on the RAPIDLab® 1200 Systems Siemens blood gas analyser. This returned a similar sodium result of 128 mmol/L, excluding the possibility of electrolyte exclusion effect on the initial indirect ISE (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). Upon further investigation, it showed that the osmolal gap was spuriously elevated (30mOsm/kg) due to a transcription error for the measured osmolality, hence confounding the true aetiology of hyponatremia. This case has shown that prompt communication between laboratory professionals and physicians will assist in resolving clinically discordant results. The osmolal gap, in particular, served as a useful adjunct in working up an ambiguous cause of hyponatremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"37 4","pages":"759-766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report a case in which a post-analytical transcription error in serum osmolality led to diagnostic delay and unnecessary investigations in a patient with hyponatremia. The principal learning point of this case is that discrepancy between measured and calculated osmolality-the osmolal gap-was critical to detecting the error and redirecting the diagnostic evaluation. A 68-year-old female with a past medical history of hyperlipidemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, was scheduled for inpatient open reduction and internal fixation of a right distal radius fracture under the Hand surgery service. She was referred to the endocrinologists in view of persistent hyponatremia. Pre-operatively, her serum sodium was 128mmol/L (reference interval 135-145mmol/L), potassium was 4.2mmol/L (3.5-5mmol/L), urea was 4.8mmol/L (2.0-6.5mmol/L), random glucose was 5.2mmol/L (4.0-7.8mmol/L) and measured osmolality was 296 mOsm/Kg (275-300 mOsm/Kg). Records of her previous serum sodium trend were reviewed, and all were within the normal reference interval since 2011. In this case, the serum osmolality was within our laboratory's normal reference interval albeit at the higher end at 296 mOsm/Kg. The initial clinical impression at this point of time was thus normo-osmolar pseudohyponatremia. The clinical pathologist's opinion was requested, and the patient's serum sodium was further evaluated on the RAPIDLab® 1200 Systems Siemens blood gas analyser. This returned a similar sodium result of 128 mmol/L, excluding the possibility of electrolyte exclusion effect on the initial indirect ISE (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). Upon further investigation, it showed that the osmolal gap was spuriously elevated (30mOsm/kg) due to a transcription error for the measured osmolality, hence confounding the true aetiology of hyponatremia. This case has shown that prompt communication between laboratory professionals and physicians will assist in resolving clinically discordant results. The osmolal gap, in particular, served as a useful adjunct in working up an ambiguous cause of hyponatremia.

真相隐藏在差距之中。
我们报告一个病例,在分析后转录错误在血清渗透压导致诊断延误和不必要的调查在低钠血症患者。这个案例的主要学习点是测量和计算的渗透压之间的差异-渗透压间隙-是检测错误和重新定向诊断评估的关键。患者68岁,女性,既往有高脂血症、高血压、2型糖尿病病史,于我院行右侧桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定手术。由于持续低钠血症,她被转介到内分泌科就诊。术前血清钠128mmol/L(参考区间135 ~ 145mmol/L),钾4.2mmol/L (3.5 ~ 5mmol/L),尿素4.8mmol/L (2.0 ~ 6.5mmol/L),随机葡萄糖5.2mmol/L (4.0 ~ 7.8mmol/L),测定渗透压296 mOsm/Kg (275 ~ 300 mOsm/Kg)。回顾其既往血清钠趋势记录,均在2011年以来的正常参考区间内。在这种情况下,血清渗透压在我们实验室的正常参考区间内,尽管在296 mOsm/Kg的高端。最初的临床表现是正常渗透性假性低钠血症。征求临床病理学家的意见,并在RAPIDLab®1200 Systems Siemens血气分析仪上进一步评估患者的血清钠。这也得到了类似的128 mmol/L钠的结果,排除了初始间接ISE中电解质排斥效应的可能性(Beckman Coulter, CA, USA)。进一步研究表明,由于测量渗透压的转录错误,渗透压间隙虚假地升高(30mOsm/kg),从而混淆了低钠血症的真正病因。这个案例表明,实验室专业人员和医生之间的及时沟通将有助于解决临床不一致的结果。特别是渗透压间隙,作为一种有用的辅助因素,有助于确定低钠血症的一个不明确的病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书