Efficacy of Growth Factor Therapy for Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Hailv Ye, Yuan Li, Yiting Zhu, Aloysius Wong, Yixiang Pan, Xiaokun Li, Jiang Wu, Huacheng He
{"title":"Efficacy of Growth Factor Therapy for Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.","authors":"Hailv Ye, Yuan Li, Yiting Zhu, Aloysius Wong, Yixiang Pan, Xiaokun Li, Jiang Wu, Huacheng He","doi":"10.1177/19373368261486376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wound healing remains a complex clinical challenge, often associated with various complications. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, a universally effective strategy for managing severe or chronic wounds has not yet been established. Growth factor (GF) therapy has emerged as a promising approach for promoting tissue repair in difficult-to-heal wounds, as evidenced by numerous preclinical investigations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on preclinical animal studies to evaluate the efficacy and potential biological mechanisms of GFs in wound healing. A total of 80 studies published in English between January 1990 and April 2025 were identified through a structured search of EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. With the exception of two studies that did not report wound healing rate (WHR) data, the remaining 78 studies consistently demonstrated that GF treatment significantly enhanced WHR compared with controls (<i>n</i> = 2031, standardized mean difference = 2.62, 95% confidence interval: 2.22-3.01). Subgroup analyses explored the influence of wound type, GF type, wound size, dosage, mode of administration, type of placebo, and animal model on treatment outcomes, revealing that GF therapy was particularly effective in infectious wounds and pressure ulcers. Although angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression are secondary outcome measures indirectly reflecting the wound healing process, the present meta-analysis demonstrates that growth factor therapy significantly enhances these reparative biological processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"19373368261486376"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19373368261486376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wound healing remains a complex clinical challenge, often associated with various complications. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, a universally effective strategy for managing severe or chronic wounds has not yet been established. Growth factor (GF) therapy has emerged as a promising approach for promoting tissue repair in difficult-to-heal wounds, as evidenced by numerous preclinical investigations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on preclinical animal studies to evaluate the efficacy and potential biological mechanisms of GFs in wound healing. A total of 80 studies published in English between January 1990 and April 2025 were identified through a structured search of EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. With the exception of two studies that did not report wound healing rate (WHR) data, the remaining 78 studies consistently demonstrated that GF treatment significantly enhanced WHR compared with controls (n = 2031, standardized mean difference = 2.62, 95% confidence interval: 2.22-3.01). Subgroup analyses explored the influence of wound type, GF type, wound size, dosage, mode of administration, type of placebo, and animal model on treatment outcomes, revealing that GF therapy was particularly effective in infectious wounds and pressure ulcers. Although angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression are secondary outcome measures indirectly reflecting the wound healing process, the present meta-analysis demonstrates that growth factor therapy significantly enhances these reparative biological processes.

生长因子治疗伤口的疗效:临床前研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
伤口愈合仍然是一个复杂的临床挑战,通常与各种并发症有关。尽管有多种治疗选择,但尚未建立一种普遍有效的治疗严重或慢性伤口的策略。许多临床前研究证明,生长因子(GF)治疗已成为促进难愈合伤口组织修复的一种有希望的方法。基于临床前动物研究,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估GFs在伤口愈合中的功效和潜在的生物学机制。通过EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science的结构化检索,确定了1990年1月至2025年4月间发表的80篇英文研究。数据分析采用RevMan 5.3软件。除两项研究未报告伤口愈合率(WHR)数据外,其余78项研究一致表明,与对照组相比,GF治疗显著提高了WHR (n = 2031,标准化平均差= 2.62,95%置信区间:2.22-3.01)。亚组分析探讨了伤口类型、GF类型、伤口大小、剂量、给药方式、安慰剂类型和动物模型对治疗结果的影响,结果显示GF治疗对感染性伤口和压疮特别有效。虽然血管生成、胶原沉积和增殖细胞核抗原表达是间接反映伤口愈合过程的次要指标,但本荟萃分析表明,生长因子治疗显著增强了这些修复生物学过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书