A Comparison of Bulimia Nervosa and Its OSFED Variant on Trait and Behavioural Indicators of Reward Constructs.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ziyu Ivan Zhao, Inge E Guerrero, Sarrah I Ali, Holly K Spinner, Alejandra Medina Fernandez, Harmony F Vides-Varini, Sophie R Abber, Naomi G Hill, Pamela K Keel
{"title":"A Comparison of Bulimia Nervosa and Its OSFED Variant on Trait and Behavioural Indicators of Reward Constructs.","authors":"Ziyu Ivan Zhao, Inge E Guerrero, Sarrah I Ali, Holly K Spinner, Alejandra Medina Fernandez, Harmony F Vides-Varini, Sophie R Abber, Naomi G Hill, Pamela K Keel","doi":"10.1002/erv.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN) demonstrate elevated reward sensitivity and reward valuation-effort (RV-e) compared to controls, whether BN differs from its other specified feeding or eating disorder variant (OSFED-BN), remains unclear. Further, whether differences best reflect categorical distinctions or correlations with symptom severity is unknown. This study examined whether trait and behavioural reward indicators differentiate BN, OSFED-BN, and controls, predict diagnostic status, and correlate with bulimic symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 349 women (153 BN, 118 OSFED-BN, 78 controls). Group comparisons, multinomial logistic regression, and correlational analyses were conducted on the Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward-Reward subscale (SPSRQ-Reward), Behavioural Activation System-Drive (BAS-Drive) scale, and progressive ratio tasks assessing RV-e for food and game rewards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BN and OSFED-BN demonstrated higher SPSRQ-Reward scores than controls but did not differ from each other. OSFED-BN, but not BN, showed higher food and game RV-e compared to controls. SPSRQ-Reward predicted higher odds of BN or OSFED-BN versus controls, whereas BAS-Drive predicted lower odds. SPSRQ-Reward was positively associated with bulimic symptom frequencies. Food RV-e was inversely associated with purging frequency.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings supported the role of reward-related processes in contributing to both dimensional and categorical differences between BN, OSFED-BN, and controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN) demonstrate elevated reward sensitivity and reward valuation-effort (RV-e) compared to controls, whether BN differs from its other specified feeding or eating disorder variant (OSFED-BN), remains unclear. Further, whether differences best reflect categorical distinctions or correlations with symptom severity is unknown. This study examined whether trait and behavioural reward indicators differentiate BN, OSFED-BN, and controls, predict diagnostic status, and correlate with bulimic symptom severity.

Methods: Participants were 349 women (153 BN, 118 OSFED-BN, 78 controls). Group comparisons, multinomial logistic regression, and correlational analyses were conducted on the Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward-Reward subscale (SPSRQ-Reward), Behavioural Activation System-Drive (BAS-Drive) scale, and progressive ratio tasks assessing RV-e for food and game rewards.

Results: BN and OSFED-BN demonstrated higher SPSRQ-Reward scores than controls but did not differ from each other. OSFED-BN, but not BN, showed higher food and game RV-e compared to controls. SPSRQ-Reward predicted higher odds of BN or OSFED-BN versus controls, whereas BAS-Drive predicted lower odds. SPSRQ-Reward was positively associated with bulimic symptom frequencies. Food RV-e was inversely associated with purging frequency.

Discussion: Findings supported the role of reward-related processes in contributing to both dimensional and categorical differences between BN, OSFED-BN, and controls.

神经性贪食症及其OSFED变异在奖励构念特征和行为指标上的比较。
虽然与对照组相比,神经性贪食症(BN)患者表现出更高的奖励敏感性和奖励评估-努力(RV-e),但BN是否与其他特定的喂养或饮食失调变体(osfd -BN)不同尚不清楚。此外,差异是否最好地反映了分类差异或与症状严重程度的相关性尚不清楚。本研究考察了性状和行为奖励指标是否能区分BN、osfd -BN和对照组,预测诊断状态,并与贪食症状严重程度相关。方法:参与者为349名女性(153名BN, 118名OSFED-BN, 78名对照组)。对惩罚敏感性/奖励敏感性子量表(SPSRQ-Reward)、行为激活系统驱动量表(BAS-Drive)和评估食物和游戏奖励RV-e的递进比例任务进行了组间比较、多项逻辑回归和相关分析。结果:BN组和osfd -BN组的SPSRQ-Reward得分高于对照组,但两者之间无显著差异。与对照组相比,OSFED-BN显示出更高的食物和猎物RV-e,而BN则没有。与对照组相比,SPSRQ-Reward预测BN或osfd -BN的几率较高,而BAS-Drive预测BN的几率较低。SPSRQ-Reward与暴食症状频率呈正相关。食物RV-e与排便频率呈负相关。讨论:研究结果支持了奖励相关过程在BN、osed -BN和对照组之间的维度和类别差异中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书