{"title":"Sample size calculation for the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design with a skewed outcome: Application to the SMART+ study.","authors":"Arijit Dey, Xiaoxi Yan, Bibhas Chakraborty","doi":"10.1177/09622802261485814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rapid emergence of personalized healthcare, adaptive interventions have gained significant traction and relevance. Contemporary research has introduced a sophisticated trial design known as the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to advance the development of effective adaptive interventions. A critical element of the SMART design is the determination of the sample size. The existing literature provides sample size calculation formulas for SMART designs, which encompass a variety of approaches and types of outcome data. However, these formulas have primarily been developed under the assumption of normality for the outcome data. In practice, the fields where SMART is employed exhibit a significant prevalence of non-normality in the outcomes of interest. This paper delves into a specific scenario where the outcome demonstrates skewed behavior. We develop precision-based and power-based formulas for skewed outcomes, considering the requirements of both pilot and full-scale SMARTs. We present the operating characteristics of the formulas and perform extensive simulations under various design specifications to validate their usefulness. To demonstrate practical utility, we apply our formulas to the SMART+ study, a digital intervention trial that includes a skewed outcome among its outcomes of interest, highlighting relevance in real-world planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"2220-2236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802261485814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the rapid emergence of personalized healthcare, adaptive interventions have gained significant traction and relevance. Contemporary research has introduced a sophisticated trial design known as the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to advance the development of effective adaptive interventions. A critical element of the SMART design is the determination of the sample size. The existing literature provides sample size calculation formulas for SMART designs, which encompass a variety of approaches and types of outcome data. However, these formulas have primarily been developed under the assumption of normality for the outcome data. In practice, the fields where SMART is employed exhibit a significant prevalence of non-normality in the outcomes of interest. This paper delves into a specific scenario where the outcome demonstrates skewed behavior. We develop precision-based and power-based formulas for skewed outcomes, considering the requirements of both pilot and full-scale SMARTs. We present the operating characteristics of the formulas and perform extensive simulations under various design specifications to validate their usefulness. To demonstrate practical utility, we apply our formulas to the SMART+ study, a digital intervention trial that includes a skewed outcome among its outcomes of interest, highlighting relevance in real-world planning.
期刊介绍:
Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)