Social Support and Mental Health Across a Public Health Crisis Lifecycle: A Three-Wave Repeated Cross-Sectional Study of Mediating Coping Mechanisms.

IF 4.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S626455
Shengmei Xu, Wenguang Wang, Kang Cao, Congrong Shi
{"title":"Social Support and Mental Health Across a Public Health Crisis Lifecycle: A Three-Wave Repeated Cross-Sectional Study of Mediating Coping Mechanisms.","authors":"Shengmei Xu, Wenguang Wang, Kang Cao, Congrong Shi","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S626455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adopting a full crisis-lifecycle perspective, this study investigates the underlying mechanism through which social support influences college students' mental health (with psychological symptoms as the core measurement indicator) via the mediating role of coping styles in major public health emergencies, and examines population-level cross-phase associations of this mechanism across three core phases of the crisis lifecycle: the emergency phase, adaptation phase, and reconstruction phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Taking the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experimental setting for the full crisis lifecycle, this study conducted a five-year, three-wave repeated cross-sectional survey with independent samples of participants in 2020, 2023, and 2025, enrolling a total of 2958 college students. Participants were assessed using the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and Psychological Questionnaires for Emergent Events of Public Health, (PQEEPH). Structural equation modeling and multi-group analyses were applied to cross-phase validation of the dual-path mediating model of coping styles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) The direct association between social support and mental health was statistically significant across all three phases (all p < 0.01), with no statistically significant difference among the three phases (p > 0.05). (2) The mediating effect of positive coping between social support and mental health was significant across all three phases (all p < 0.05), and the mediating effect of positive coping showed a progressive increasing trend across phases, with a marginally significant difference observed between the emergency and reconstruction phases (β = 0.081, p < 0.05). (3) The mediating effect of negative coping between social support and mental health was significant across all three phases (all p < 0.05), with no significant temporal difference among the three phases (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Throughout the full lifecycle of major public health emergencies, the effects of social support on mental health exhibit asynchronous cross-phase patterns at the population level: the direct effect remains stable across phases, the mediating pathway of positive coping shows a progressive increase across the three phases, with the largest effect observed in the reconstruction phase, while the mediating effect of negative coping remains stable across phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"19 ","pages":"626455"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13564448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S626455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Adopting a full crisis-lifecycle perspective, this study investigates the underlying mechanism through which social support influences college students' mental health (with psychological symptoms as the core measurement indicator) via the mediating role of coping styles in major public health emergencies, and examines population-level cross-phase associations of this mechanism across three core phases of the crisis lifecycle: the emergency phase, adaptation phase, and reconstruction phase.

Methods: Taking the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experimental setting for the full crisis lifecycle, this study conducted a five-year, three-wave repeated cross-sectional survey with independent samples of participants in 2020, 2023, and 2025, enrolling a total of 2958 college students. Participants were assessed using the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and Psychological Questionnaires for Emergent Events of Public Health, (PQEEPH). Structural equation modeling and multi-group analyses were applied to cross-phase validation of the dual-path mediating model of coping styles.

Results: (1) The direct association between social support and mental health was statistically significant across all three phases (all p < 0.01), with no statistically significant difference among the three phases (p > 0.05). (2) The mediating effect of positive coping between social support and mental health was significant across all three phases (all p < 0.05), and the mediating effect of positive coping showed a progressive increasing trend across phases, with a marginally significant difference observed between the emergency and reconstruction phases (β = 0.081, p < 0.05). (3) The mediating effect of negative coping between social support and mental health was significant across all three phases (all p < 0.05), with no significant temporal difference among the three phases (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Throughout the full lifecycle of major public health emergencies, the effects of social support on mental health exhibit asynchronous cross-phase patterns at the population level: the direct effect remains stable across phases, the mediating pathway of positive coping shows a progressive increase across the three phases, with the largest effect observed in the reconstruction phase, while the mediating effect of negative coping remains stable across phases.

跨公共卫生危机生命周期的社会支持与心理健康:中介应对机制的三波重复横断面研究
目的:采用全危机生命周期视角,探讨重大突发公共卫生事件中社会支持通过应对方式对大学生心理健康(以心理症状为核心测量指标)的中介作用机制,并考察该机制在危机生命周期三个核心阶段的人群水平跨阶段关联。应急阶段、适应阶段和重建阶段。方法:本研究以新冠肺炎大流行为全危机生命周期的自然实验环境,于2020年、2023年、2025年进行为期5年、三波重复横断面调查,独立样本参与者共2958名。采用社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)和突发公共卫生事件心理问卷(PQEEPH)对被试进行评估。采用结构方程模型和多组分析对应对方式双路径中介模型进行了跨阶段验证。结果:(1)社会支持与心理健康的直接相关在三个阶段间均有统计学意义(p < 0.01),而三个阶段间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。(2)积极应对在社会支持与心理健康之间的中介作用在3个阶段均显著(p < 0.05),且积极应对的中介作用在各阶段呈递进增强趋势,在应急阶段与重建阶段之间差异有统计学意义(β = 0.081, p < 0.05)。(3)负性应对在社会支持与心理健康之间的中介作用在三个阶段均显著(p < 0.05),三个阶段间无显著时间差异(p < 0.05)。结论:在重大突发公共卫生事件的全生命周期中,社会支持对心理健康的影响在人群层面上呈现出非同步的跨阶段模式:直接效应在各阶段保持稳定,积极应对的中介通路在三个阶段呈逐步增加的趋势,其中重建阶段的影响最大,而消极应对的中介效应在各阶段保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书