Species-specific patterns in fine-root traits and their coordination in the multidimensional root economics space at the Mongolian forest-steppe ecotone.

IF 2.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Naoki Makita, Taiga Masumoto, Davaajav Dalkhsuren, Gerelbaatar Sukhbaatar, Baatarbileg Nachin, Tetsuoh Shirota, Koh Yasue
{"title":"Species-specific patterns in fine-root traits and their coordination in the multidimensional root economics space at the Mongolian forest-steppe ecotone.","authors":"Naoki Makita, Taiga Masumoto, Davaajav Dalkhsuren, Gerelbaatar Sukhbaatar, Baatarbileg Nachin, Tetsuoh Shirota, Koh Yasue","doi":"10.1007/s00442-026-05972-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the bioclimatically sensitive forest-steppe ecotone of northern Mongolia, belowground strategies can be elucidated using an integrated approach that considers root functional traits and symbiotic associations. We elucidated how three dominant tree species, namely Larix sibirica, Pinus sylvestris, and Betula platyphylla, coordinate their morphological, chemical, and symbiotic (ectomycorrhizal [EM]) traits within a multidimensional root economics space (RES) to adapt to this harsh ecotone. Although the RES framework generally associates thicker roots with greater reliance on fungi, EM colonization was highest in the thinnest-rooted species, B. platyphylla, with the highest specific root length (SRL), and lowest in the thickest-rooted species, L. sibirica, with the lowest SRL. Principal component analysis revealed that the primary axis of variation represents a synergistic acquisition gradient, rather than a traditional trade-off between morphological exploration and symbiotic associations. Along this axis, SRL and EM colonization were positively coordinated, indicating that B. platyphylla maximized its resource acquisition capacity by integrating high soil exploration with intensive fungal collaboration. This synergy is likely driven by higher root branching intensity in thinner roots, which provides more infection sites for EM fungi. In contrast, the conifers exhibit different root-trait combinations: P. sylvestris optimizes structural and chemical conservation, whereas L. sibirica employs a decoupled strategy to minimize symbiotic investment and maintain high metabolic potential. Our study highlights that tree species coexist by employing divergent resource-acquisition pathways, ranging from integrated combinations to resource-conservative trait syndromes, under intensifying climatic stress in Central Asia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"208 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13569530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-026-05972-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the bioclimatically sensitive forest-steppe ecotone of northern Mongolia, belowground strategies can be elucidated using an integrated approach that considers root functional traits and symbiotic associations. We elucidated how three dominant tree species, namely Larix sibirica, Pinus sylvestris, and Betula platyphylla, coordinate their morphological, chemical, and symbiotic (ectomycorrhizal [EM]) traits within a multidimensional root economics space (RES) to adapt to this harsh ecotone. Although the RES framework generally associates thicker roots with greater reliance on fungi, EM colonization was highest in the thinnest-rooted species, B. platyphylla, with the highest specific root length (SRL), and lowest in the thickest-rooted species, L. sibirica, with the lowest SRL. Principal component analysis revealed that the primary axis of variation represents a synergistic acquisition gradient, rather than a traditional trade-off between morphological exploration and symbiotic associations. Along this axis, SRL and EM colonization were positively coordinated, indicating that B. platyphylla maximized its resource acquisition capacity by integrating high soil exploration with intensive fungal collaboration. This synergy is likely driven by higher root branching intensity in thinner roots, which provides more infection sites for EM fungi. In contrast, the conifers exhibit different root-trait combinations: P. sylvestris optimizes structural and chemical conservation, whereas L. sibirica employs a decoupled strategy to minimize symbiotic investment and maintain high metabolic potential. Our study highlights that tree species coexist by employing divergent resource-acquisition pathways, ranging from integrated combinations to resource-conservative trait syndromes, under intensifying climatic stress in Central Asia.

蒙古森林-草原交错带细根性状的物种特异性及其多维根系经济空间协调
在蒙古北部生物气候敏感的森林-草原过渡带,地下策略可以通过综合考虑根系功能特征和共生关系的方法来阐明。研究了西伯利亚落叶松(Larix sibirica)、西林松(Pinus sylvestris)和白桦(Betula platyphylla)这三种优势树种如何在多维根经济学空间(RES)中协调其形态、化学和共生(外生菌根[EM])特征,以适应这种恶劣的过渡带。虽然RES框架通常认为较厚的根更依赖真菌,但EM定植在根最薄的物种白桦(B. platyphylla)中最高,具有最高的比根长度(SRL),而在根最厚的物种西伯利亚松(L. sibirica)中最低,具有最低的比根长度(SRL)。主成分分析表明,变异的主轴代表了一个协同获取梯度,而不是传统的形态探索和共生关联之间的权衡。沿此轴,SRL和EM的定殖是正协调的,表明白桦通过将高土壤勘探与真菌合作结合在一起,实现了资源获取能力的最大化。这种协同作用可能是由较薄的根中较高的根分枝强度驱动的,这为EM真菌提供了更多的感染位点。相比之下,针叶树表现出不同的根性状组合:西尔山针叶树采用优化的结构和化学保护策略,而西伯利亚针叶树采用解耦策略以减少共生投资并保持较高的代谢潜力。我们的研究强调,在中亚日益加剧的气候压力下,树种通过不同的资源获取途径共存,从整合组合到资源保守性状综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书