The Sound Environment in the PICU: A Scoping Review Describing Sound Levels, Interventions and Patient Impacts

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Journal of paediatrics and child health Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Epub Date: 2026-09-11 DOI:10.1111/jpc.70591
Janeen Bower, Hazel Low, Naomi Khan, Sebastian J. Corlette, Emma Macdonald-Laurs, Andrea Veysey, Ben Gelbart, Kate Masterson
{"title":"The Sound Environment in the PICU: A Scoping Review Describing Sound Levels, Interventions and Patient Impacts","authors":"Janeen Bower,&nbsp;Hazel Low,&nbsp;Naomi Khan,&nbsp;Sebastian J. Corlette,&nbsp;Emma Macdonald-Laurs,&nbsp;Andrea Veysey,&nbsp;Ben Gelbart,&nbsp;Kate Masterson","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elevated sound levels are associated with increased morbidity in adult and neonatal intensive care; however, their impact in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) remains poorly characterised. The aim of this scoping review was to characterise sound exposure in the PICU, including its measurement, sources, and associations with patient outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), and PubMed were searched up to 5 November 2025 for full-text, peer-reviewed publications within the past 10 years to reflect the contemporary PICU environment. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by two authors, and results were reported according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Thirty-six publications were included. Publications were grouped into five domains: measurement of sound levels; sources of sound; patient impacts; sound reduction interventions including care bundles incorporating sound descriptions; and other. Reported sound levels varied substantially across studies, reflecting heterogeneity in measurement approaches and clinical contexts. Most studies reported sound levels above WHO recommendations, and several reported maximum levels exceeding 80 dBA. Sound sources were broadly categorised as medical equipment, human activity, and environmental factors. Links between elevated sound and clinically meaningful outcomes remain uncertain. Intervention studies were limited, often behaviour-focused, and rarely evaluated patient-centred outcomes or clinical sustainability. Current evidence suggests WHO recommended sound levels are rarely achieved. The sound environment in the PICU is multifaceted, reflecting the interaction of clinical equipment, human activity, and environmental systems. There is a need for interventional research to evaluate whether modification of the PICU sound environment meaningfully improves patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"62 10","pages":"1881-1893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpc.70591","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.70591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevated sound levels are associated with increased morbidity in adult and neonatal intensive care; however, their impact in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) remains poorly characterised. The aim of this scoping review was to characterise sound exposure in the PICU, including its measurement, sources, and associations with patient outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), and PubMed were searched up to 5 November 2025 for full-text, peer-reviewed publications within the past 10 years to reflect the contemporary PICU environment. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by two authors, and results were reported according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Thirty-six publications were included. Publications were grouped into five domains: measurement of sound levels; sources of sound; patient impacts; sound reduction interventions including care bundles incorporating sound descriptions; and other. Reported sound levels varied substantially across studies, reflecting heterogeneity in measurement approaches and clinical contexts. Most studies reported sound levels above WHO recommendations, and several reported maximum levels exceeding 80 dBA. Sound sources were broadly categorised as medical equipment, human activity, and environmental factors. Links between elevated sound and clinically meaningful outcomes remain uncertain. Intervention studies were limited, often behaviour-focused, and rarely evaluated patient-centred outcomes or clinical sustainability. Current evidence suggests WHO recommended sound levels are rarely achieved. The sound environment in the PICU is multifaceted, reflecting the interaction of clinical equipment, human activity, and environmental systems. There is a need for interventional research to evaluate whether modification of the PICU sound environment meaningfully improves patient outcomes.

PICU中的声音环境:描述声级、干预和患者影响的范围综述。
在成人和新生儿重症监护中,声级升高与发病率增加有关;然而,它们在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的影响仍然很差。本综述的目的是描述PICU内的声音暴露,包括其测量、来源以及与患者预后的关系。在MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid)和PubMed检索了截至2025年11月5日的过去10年的全文,同行评议的出版物,以反映当代PICU环境。题目、摘要和全文由两位作者独立筛选,结果根据PRISMA扩展范围审查报告。其中包括36份出版物。出版物分为五个领域:声级测量;声源;病人的影响;减少声音干预措施,包括包含声音描述的护理包;和其他。不同研究报告的声级差异很大,反映了测量方法和临床环境的异质性。大多数研究报告的声音水平高于世卫组织的建议,有几个报告的最大水平超过80分贝。声源大致分为医疗设备、人类活动和环境因素。声音升高与临床有意义的结果之间的联系仍不确定。干预研究是有限的,通常以行为为中心,很少评估以患者为中心的结果或临床可持续性。目前的证据表明,很少能达到世卫组织建议的声音水平。PICU的声音环境是多方面的,反映了临床设备、人类活动和环境系统的相互作用。有必要进行介入性研究,以评估PICU声音环境的改变是否有意义地改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书