Justine Tomlinson, Adam Nyende, Nazreen Butt, Boris Burnell-Anderson, Beth Fylan, Heather Smith, Jonathan Silcock, Rebecca Lawton
{"title":"Developing items for a patient-reported experience measure for post-discharge medicines management in older patients: a stakeholder-led approach.","authors":"Justine Tomlinson, Adam Nyende, Nazreen Butt, Boris Burnell-Anderson, Beth Fylan, Heather Smith, Jonathan Silcock, Rebecca Lawton","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riag122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication-related harm following hospital discharge is a well-documented patient safety concern, particularly among older adults with multiple health conditions. Despite increasing attention to transitions of care, there is no patient-reported experience measure (PREM) specifically focused on post-discharge medicines management. Existing tools primarily measure clinical outcomes, overlooking how patients experience and manage medicines during this vulnerable period. The overarching aim was to develop PREM items for post-discharge medicines management in older adults using a stakeholder-led approach. This paper outlines the methods used to generate, refine, and pilot the PREM items.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed PREM items by drawing on existing literature and working with patient and public involvement (PPI). We organised four iterative co-design workshops involving patients, carers, and healthcare professionals, and we generated, refined, and prioritised items. Items were grouped into domains and revised based on feedback. Readability was assessed and further refined through piloting.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>The initial pool of 147 items was reduced to an 18-item PREM tool for use two weeks post-discharge and a 15-item PREM tool for three months post-discharge. Items cover five domains: information, involvement, relationships, systems, and autonomy. Piloting indicated good readability and acceptability, with feedback highlighting the importance of clear language and logical question sequencing. Notable differences emerged between patient and healthcare professional perspectives on care and communication priorities, which we reconciled through a collaborative approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work presents PREM items developed through stakeholder-led methods, focused on capturing patient experience in post-discharge medicines management, offering a potential mechanism for assessing care quality. Further validation in diverse populations is underway to support safer, person-centred medicines management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riag122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Medication-related harm following hospital discharge is a well-documented patient safety concern, particularly among older adults with multiple health conditions. Despite increasing attention to transitions of care, there is no patient-reported experience measure (PREM) specifically focused on post-discharge medicines management. Existing tools primarily measure clinical outcomes, overlooking how patients experience and manage medicines during this vulnerable period. The overarching aim was to develop PREM items for post-discharge medicines management in older adults using a stakeholder-led approach. This paper outlines the methods used to generate, refine, and pilot the PREM items.
Methods: We developed PREM items by drawing on existing literature and working with patient and public involvement (PPI). We organised four iterative co-design workshops involving patients, carers, and healthcare professionals, and we generated, refined, and prioritised items. Items were grouped into domains and revised based on feedback. Readability was assessed and further refined through piloting.
Key findings: The initial pool of 147 items was reduced to an 18-item PREM tool for use two weeks post-discharge and a 15-item PREM tool for three months post-discharge. Items cover five domains: information, involvement, relationships, systems, and autonomy. Piloting indicated good readability and acceptability, with feedback highlighting the importance of clear language and logical question sequencing. Notable differences emerged between patient and healthcare professional perspectives on care and communication priorities, which we reconciled through a collaborative approach.
Conclusion: This work presents PREM items developed through stakeholder-led methods, focused on capturing patient experience in post-discharge medicines management, offering a potential mechanism for assessing care quality. Further validation in diverse populations is underway to support safer, person-centred medicines management.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.