Developing items for a patient-reported experience measure for post-discharge medicines management in older patients: a stakeholder-led approach.

IF 2.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Justine Tomlinson, Adam Nyende, Nazreen Butt, Boris Burnell-Anderson, Beth Fylan, Heather Smith, Jonathan Silcock, Rebecca Lawton
{"title":"Developing items for a patient-reported experience measure for post-discharge medicines management in older patients: a stakeholder-led approach.","authors":"Justine Tomlinson, Adam Nyende, Nazreen Butt, Boris Burnell-Anderson, Beth Fylan, Heather Smith, Jonathan Silcock, Rebecca Lawton","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riag122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication-related harm following hospital discharge is a well-documented patient safety concern, particularly among older adults with multiple health conditions. Despite increasing attention to transitions of care, there is no patient-reported experience measure (PREM) specifically focused on post-discharge medicines management. Existing tools primarily measure clinical outcomes, overlooking how patients experience and manage medicines during this vulnerable period. The overarching aim was to develop PREM items for post-discharge medicines management in older adults using a stakeholder-led approach. This paper outlines the methods used to generate, refine, and pilot the PREM items.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed PREM items by drawing on existing literature and working with patient and public involvement (PPI). We organised four iterative co-design workshops involving patients, carers, and healthcare professionals, and we generated, refined, and prioritised items. Items were grouped into domains and revised based on feedback. Readability was assessed and further refined through piloting.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>The initial pool of 147 items was reduced to an 18-item PREM tool for use two weeks post-discharge and a 15-item PREM tool for three months post-discharge. Items cover five domains: information, involvement, relationships, systems, and autonomy. Piloting indicated good readability and acceptability, with feedback highlighting the importance of clear language and logical question sequencing. Notable differences emerged between patient and healthcare professional perspectives on care and communication priorities, which we reconciled through a collaborative approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work presents PREM items developed through stakeholder-led methods, focused on capturing patient experience in post-discharge medicines management, offering a potential mechanism for assessing care quality. Further validation in diverse populations is underway to support safer, person-centred medicines management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riag122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medication-related harm following hospital discharge is a well-documented patient safety concern, particularly among older adults with multiple health conditions. Despite increasing attention to transitions of care, there is no patient-reported experience measure (PREM) specifically focused on post-discharge medicines management. Existing tools primarily measure clinical outcomes, overlooking how patients experience and manage medicines during this vulnerable period. The overarching aim was to develop PREM items for post-discharge medicines management in older adults using a stakeholder-led approach. This paper outlines the methods used to generate, refine, and pilot the PREM items.

Methods: We developed PREM items by drawing on existing literature and working with patient and public involvement (PPI). We organised four iterative co-design workshops involving patients, carers, and healthcare professionals, and we generated, refined, and prioritised items. Items were grouped into domains and revised based on feedback. Readability was assessed and further refined through piloting.

Key findings: The initial pool of 147 items was reduced to an 18-item PREM tool for use two weeks post-discharge and a 15-item PREM tool for three months post-discharge. Items cover five domains: information, involvement, relationships, systems, and autonomy. Piloting indicated good readability and acceptability, with feedback highlighting the importance of clear language and logical question sequencing. Notable differences emerged between patient and healthcare professional perspectives on care and communication priorities, which we reconciled through a collaborative approach.

Conclusion: This work presents PREM items developed through stakeholder-led methods, focused on capturing patient experience in post-discharge medicines management, offering a potential mechanism for assessing care quality. Further validation in diverse populations is underway to support safer, person-centred medicines management.

为老年患者出院后药物管理制定患者报告经验测量项目:利益相关者主导的方法。
目的:出院后药物相关伤害是一个有充分记录的患者安全问题,特别是在患有多种健康状况的老年人中。尽管越来越多的人关注护理的过渡,但没有患者报告的经验措施(PREM)专门针对出院后药物管理。现有工具主要衡量临床结果,忽视了患者在这一脆弱时期如何使用和管理药物。总体目标是使用利益相关者主导的方法开发老年人出院后药物管理的PREM项目。本文概述了用于生成、细化和试点PREM项目的方法。方法:我们借鉴现有文献,采用患者和公众参与(PPI)的方法开发PREM项目。我们组织了四次迭代的共同设计研讨会,涉及患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员,我们生成、改进和优先考虑项目。项目被分组到域中,并根据反馈进行修改。通过试点评估和进一步完善可读性。主要发现:最初的147项减少到18项PREM工具,在出院后两周使用,在出院后三个月使用15项PREM工具。项目涵盖五个领域:信息、参与、关系、系统和自主性。试运行表明了良好的可读性和可接受性,反馈强调了清晰的语言和逻辑问题顺序的重要性。在护理和沟通优先级方面,患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点出现了显著差异,我们通过协作方式加以协调。结论:本研究提出了通过利益相关者主导的方法开发的PREM项目,重点关注患者出院后药物管理的经验,为评估护理质量提供了一种潜在的机制。正在对不同人群进行进一步验证,以支持更安全、以人为本的药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书